Skip to main content

Primary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding in Liver Cirrhosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Variceal Bleeding in Liver Cirrhosis

Abstract

Variceal hemorrhage is a life-threatening complication of portal hypertension. Prevalence of gastroesophageal varices may reach 70% in patients with advanced liver disease; therefore prophylaxis of variceal bleeding is recommended for this population. Indications for primary prophylaxis include presence of large esophageal varices, presence of high-risk stigmata, and/or Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C in patients with small varices. Nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) and endoscopic variceal band ligation are the cornerstone for prevention of first variceal bleeding. Although NSBB are preferred on patients with small esophageal varices and high-risk features, the decision should be individualized and contraindications and potential adverse effects of both therapies should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chalasani N, Kahi C, Francois F, Pinto A, Marathe A, Bini EJ, et al. Improved patient survival after acute variceal bleeding: a multicenter, cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(3):653–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reverter E, Tandon P, Augustin S, Turon F, Casu S, Bastiampillai R et al. A MELD-based model to determine risk of mortality among patients with acute variceal bleeding. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(2):412–19.e3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fortune BE, Garcia-Tsao G, Ciarleglio M, Deng Y, Fallon MB, Sigal S, et al. Child-Turcotte-Pugh class is best at stratifying risk in variceal hemorrhage: analysis of a US multicenter prospective study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51(5):446–53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kovalak M, Lake J, Mattek N, Eisen G, Lieberman D, Zaman A. Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhotic patients: data from a national endoscopic database. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(1):82–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Bosch J. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2017;65(1):310–35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2018;69(2):406–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. North Italian Endoscopic Club for the S, Treatment of Esophageal V. Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study. The New England journal of medicine. 1988;319(15):983–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D’Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: an evidence-based approach. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19(4):475–505.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mishra SR, Sharma BC, Kumar A, Sarin SK. Primary prophylaxis of gastric variceal bleeding comparing cyanoacrylate injection and beta-blockers: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2011;54(6):1161–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Banares R, Moitinho E, Matilla A, Garcia-Pagan JC, Lampreave JL, Piera C, et al. Randomized comparison of long-term carvedilol and propranolol administration in the treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2002;36(6):1367–73.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reiberger T, Ulbrich G, Ferlitsch A, Payer BA, Schwabl P, Pinter M, et al. Carvedilol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with haemodynamic nonresponse to propranolol. Gut

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sinagra E, Perricone G, D’Amico M, Tine F, D’Amico G. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the haemodynamic effects of carvedilol compared with propranolol for portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39(6):557–68.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Villanueva C, Aracil C, Colomo A, Hernandez-Gea V, Lopez-Balaguer JM, Alvarez-Urturi C, et al. Acute hemodynamic response to beta-blockers and prediction of long-term outcome in primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(1):119–28.

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Franchis R. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015;63(3):743–52

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abraldes JG, Tarantino I, Turnes J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Rodes J, Bosch J. Hemodynamic response to pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension and long-term prognosis of cirrhosis. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2003;37(4):902–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Senzolo M, Cholongitas E, Burra P, Leandro G, Thalheimer U, Patch D, et al. β-Blockers protect against spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis. Liver Int. 2009;29(8):1189–93.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krag A, Wiest R, Albillos A, Gluud LL. The window hypothesis: haemodynamic and non-haemodynamic effects of beta-blockers improve survival of patients with cirrhosis during a window in the disease. Gut. 2012;61(7):967–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Serste T, Melot C, Francoz C, Durand F, Rautou PE, Valla D, et al. Deleterious effects of beta-blockers on survival in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mandorfer M, Bota S, Schwabl P, Bucsics T, Pfisterer N, Kruzik M et al. Nonselective beta blockers increase risk for hepatorenal syndrome and death in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(7):1680–90.e1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim SG, Larson JJ, Lee JS, Therneau TM, Kim WR. Beneficial and harmful effects of nonselective beta blockade on acute kidney injury in liver transplant candidates. Liver Transplant. 2017;23(6):733–40.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bossen L, Krag A, Vilstrup H, Watson H, Jepsen P. Nonselective beta-blockers do not affect mortality in cirrhosis patients with ascites: Post Hoc analysis of three randomized controlled trials with 1198 patients. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2016;63(6):1968–76.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chirapongsathorn S, Valentin N, Alahdab F, Krittanawong C, Erwin PJ, Murad MH et al. Nonselective beta-blockers and survival in patients with cirrhosis and ascites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(8):1096–104.e9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leithead JA, Rajoriya N, Tehami N, Hodson J, Gunson BK, Tripathi D, et al. Non-selective beta-blockers are associated with improved survival in patients with ascites listed for liver transplantation. Gut. 2015;64(7):1111–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mookerjee RP, Pavesi M, Thomsen KL, Mehta G, Macnaughtan J, Bendtsen F, et al. Treatment with non-selective beta blockers is associated with reduced severity of systemic inflammation and improved survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. J Hepatol. 2016;64(3):574–82.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia-Pagan JC, Villanueva C, Vila MC, Albillos A, Genesca J, Ruiz-Del-Arbol L, et al. Isosorbide mononitrate in the prevention of first variceal bleed in patients who cannot receive beta-blockers. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(4):908–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gluud LL, Langholz E, Krag A. Meta-analysis: isosorbide-mononitrate alone or with either beta-blockers or endoscopic therapy for the management of oesophageal varices. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32(7):859–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim RG, Loomba R, Prokop LJ, Singh S. Statin use and risk of cirrhosis and related complications in patients with chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(10):1521–30 e8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pollo-Flores P, Soldan M, Santos UC, Kunz DG, Mattos DE, da Silva AC, et al. Three months of simvastatin therapy vs. placebo for severe portal hypertension in cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial. Digest Liver Dis. 2015;47(11):957–63.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Abraldes JG, Albillos A, Banares R, Turnes J, Gonzalez R, Garcia-Pagan JC, et al. Simvastatin lowers portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(5):1651–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cabrera L, Abraldes JG. Statins: the panacea of cirrhosis? Curr Hepatol Rep. 2016;15(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bays H, Cohen DE, Chalasani N, Harrison SA. The National Lipid Association’s Statin Safety Task F. An assessment by the Statin Liver Safety Task Force: 2014 update. J Clin Lipidol. 2014;8(3 Suppl):S47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Imperiale TF, Chalasani N. A meta-analysis of endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2001;33(4):802–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dell’Era A, Sotela JC, Fabris FM, Petazzi G, Reati R, Iannuzzi F, et al. Primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients: a cohort study. Digest Liver Dis. 2008;40(12):936–43.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Imperiale TF, Klein RW, Chalasani N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of variceal ligation vs. beta-blockers for primary prevention of variceal bleeding. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2007;45(4):870–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Funakoshi N, Duny Y, Valats JC, Segalas-Largey F, Flori N, Bismuth M, et al. Meta-analysis: beta-blockers versus banding ligation for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding. Ann Hepatol. 2012;11(3):369–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gluud LL, Krag A. Banding ligation versus beta-blockers for primary prevention in oesophageal varices in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(8):Cd004544.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sharma M, Singh S, Desai V, Shah VH, Kamath PS, Murad MH, et al. Comparison of therapies for primary prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2019;69(4):1657–75

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li T, Ke W, Sun P, Chen X, Belgaumkar A, Huang Y, et al. Carvedilol for portal hypertension in cirrhosis: systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e010902.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sarin SK, Wadhawan M, Agarwal SR, Tyagi P, Sharma BC. Endoscopic variceal ligation plus propranolol versus endoscopic variceal ligation alone in primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(4):797–804.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lo GH, Chen WC, Wang HM, Lee CC. Controlled trial of ligation plus nadolol versus nadolol alone for the prevention of first variceal bleeding. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2010;52(1):230–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bai M, Qi X, Yang M, Han G, Fan D. Combined therapies versus monotherapies for the first variceal bleeding in patients with high-risk varices: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(3):442–52.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Grace ND, Burroughs AK, Planas R, et al. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(21):2254–61.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Villanueva C, Albillos A, Genesca J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Calleja JL, Aracil C, et al. beta blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (PREDESCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10181):1597–608.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Merkel C, Marin R, Angeli P, Zanella P, Felder M, Bernardinello E, et al. A placebo-controlled clinical trial of nadolol in the prophylaxis of growth of small esophageal varices in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(2):476–84.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bhardwaj A, Kedarisetty CK, Vashishtha C, Bhadoria AS, Jindal A, Kumar G, et al. Carvedilol delays the progression of small oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Gut. 2017;66(10):1838–43.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sarin SK, Mishra SR, Sharma P, Sharma BC, Kumar A. Early primary prophylaxis with beta-blockers does not prevent the growth of small esophageal varices in cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatol Int. 2013;7(1):248–56.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kumar A, Sharma P, Anikhindi SA, Prajapati R, Agarwal R, Sharma B, et al. Can Non-Selective Beta-Blockers (NSBBs) prevent enlargement of small esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis? A meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2017;7(4):275–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas A. Simonetto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Piccolo Serafim, L., Simonetto, D.A. (2021). Primary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding in Liver Cirrhosis. In: Guo, X., Qi, X. (eds) Variceal Bleeding in Liver Cirrhosis. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7249-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7249-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7248-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7249-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics