Abstract
For setting up an early warning system or for making a decision of disaster mitigation, real-time precipitation observation collected by in situ stations are necessary. However, the data easily become corrupted because of sensor failure or communication error. The simulations of a relevant hydrologic model under an extreme situation could be ridiculous due to incorrect precipitation observations as model inputs. Anomaly detection approaches are essential to flag anomalous data that not conform to expected behavior from normal data in near-real time. Manual inspection was used as an anomaly detection approach, but no longer applicable for big data and near-real time application due to manpower limitation. Therefore, this study proposes an automated anomaly detection procedure for precipitation including neighboring station selection and spatial consistency checking. First, the neighboring stations are not manually selected by a fixed distance, but automatically selected by the self-organizing maps (SOM) with recent historical records. Second, the target observation pairwise compares against concurrent neighboring observations to flag inconsistent data as anomalies. Because a suitable estimation of the target station is unnecessary in this procedure, it is applicable in areas with high spatial and temporal variability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Eischeid JK, Baker CB, Karl TR, Diaz HF (1995) The quality-control of long-term climatological data using objective data-analysis. J Appl Meteorol 34(12):2787–2795. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034%3c2787:tqcolt%3e2.0.co;2
Estevez J, Garcia-Marin AP, Morabito JA, Cavagnaro M (2016) Quality assurance procedures for validating meteorological input variables of reference evapotranspiration in mendoza province (Argentina). Agric Water Manag 172:96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.019
Estevez J, Gavilan P, Garcia-Marin AP, Zardi D (2015) Detection of spurious precipitation signals from automatic weather stations in irrigated areas. Int J Climatol 35(7):1556–1568. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4076
Estevez J, Gavilan P, Giraldez JV (2011) Guidelines on validation procedures for meteorological data from automatic weather stations. J Hydrol 402(1–2):144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.031
Hill DJ, Minsker BS (2010) Anomaly detection in streaming environmental sensor data: a data-driven modeling approach. Environ Model Softw 25(9):1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.08.010
Hubbard KG, Goddard S, Sorensen WD, Wells N, Osugi TT (2005) Performance of quality assurance procedures for an applied climate information system. J Atmosp Oceanic Technol 22(1):105–112. https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-1657.1
Hubbard KG, Guttman NB, You JS, Chen ZR (2007) An improved QC process for temperature in the daily cooperative weather observations. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 24(2):206–213. https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech1963.1
Hubbard KG, Lin X (2002) Realtime data filtering models for air temperature measurements. Geophys Res Lett 29(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013191
Hubbard KG, You JS (2005) Sensitivity analysis of quality assurance using the spatial regression approach - a case study of the maximum/minimum air temperature. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 22(10):1520–1530. https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech1790.1
Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps of massive databases. Eng Int Syst Electr Eng Commun 9(4):179–185
Kunkel KE et al (2005) Quality control of pre-1948 cooperative observer network data. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 22(11):1691–1705. https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech1816.1
Lopez-Lineros M, Estevez J, Giraldez JV, Madueno A (2014) A new quality control procedure based on non-linear autoregressive neural network for validating raw river stage data. J Hydrol 510:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.026
Scherrer SC et al (2011) Operational quality control of daily precipitation using spatio-climatological plausibility testing. Meteorol Z 20(4):397–407. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2011/0236
You JS, Hubbard KG (2006) Quality control of weather data during extreme events. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 23(2):184–197. https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech1851.1
You JS, Hubbard KG, Mahmood R, Sridhar V, Todey D (2010) Quality control of soil water data in applied climate information system-case study in Nebraska. J Hydrol Eng 15(3):200–209. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000174
You JS, Hubbard KG, Nadarajah S, Kunkel KE (2007) Performance of quality assurance procedures on daily precipitation. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 24(5):821–834. https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech2002.1
Acknowledgements
The research was part of plan (grant no. Most 107-2119-M-492-010) funded by the Central Taiwan Science Park, Taiwan. The authors would like to thank its supporting.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yang, SC., Wu, MC., Kao, HM., Yang, TH. (2020). An Automated Anomaly Detection Procedure for Hourly Observed Precipitation in Near-Real Time Application. In: Gourbesville, P., Caignaert, G. (eds) Advances in Hydroinformatics. Springer Water. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5436-0_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5436-0_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5435-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5436-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)