Skip to main content

Introduction to Sample Size Determination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Determining Sample Size and Power in Research Studies

Abstract

Research is generally conducted to examine characteristics of a population. Studying entire population becomes expensive hence we examine a sample drawn from the population of interest to draw inferences. Except in census studies, all research is carried out on the basis of a sample. Sample studies, if done carefully, are more efficient than the population studies as they are economical and consume less time. However, the essential pre-requisite for statistical efficiency of any study is the representativeness of the chosen sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bartlett, J. E., II., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size for survey research (PDF). Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). ISBN 0-8058-0283-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, J., & Fonseca, L. M. (2014). How sample size influences research outcomes. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 19(4), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.027-029.ebo.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugard, A. J. B., & Potts, H. W. W. (2015). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453.

  • Gambrill, W. (2006, June). False positives on newborns’ disease tests worry parents. Health Day. 34471.html(dead link).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachin, M. (1981). Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2, 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, J. A., & Davey, S. G. (2001). Sifting the evidence—What’s wrong with significance tests. BMJ, 322, 226–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacholder, S., Chanock, S., Garcia-Closas, M., Elghormli, L., & Rothman, N. (2004). Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: An approach for molecular epidemiology studies. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96, 434–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Verma .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Verma, J.P., Verma, P. (2020). Introduction to Sample Size Determination. In: Determining Sample Size and Power in Research Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5204-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics