Skip to main content

Processes in Portfolio Development Journey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Portfolio Assessment for the Teaching and Learning of Writing

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

Abstract

This chapter intends to unfold average portfolio development journeys. First, I will introduce what portfolio keeping entails, followed by describing typical portfolio development procedures as mentioned in Fig. 1.1. Second, I will thoroughly discuss the five major assessment principles which govern the operation of writing portfolio assessment, namely validity, reliability, authenticity, practicality and impact. Next, I will provide teachers, educationalists and administrators with detailed accounts concerning how to set up a portfolio assessment programme for school-level students and how to constructively align portfolio assessment with existing writing instruction. The penultimate section delineates two case studies which illustrate one process-oriented and one product-oriented portfolio programmes. Lastly, the chapter closes with an evaluation task, requiring readers to compare and contrast the two portfolio programmes and to design a context-specific portfolio programme with rationale and critique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atai, M. R., & Alipour, M. (2012). The effect of the combination of small-group conferencing and portfolio procedure on EFL students’ writing accuracy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, S. (2010). EFL writers’ perceptions of portfolio keeping. Assessing Writing, 15(3), 194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York, NY: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge, D. (2010). Eportfolios for lifelong learning and deliberative assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, C., Folse, K., & Hubley, N. (2007). A practical guide to assessing English language learners. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delett, J. S., Barnhardt, S., & Kevorkian, J. A. (2001). A framework for portfolio assessment in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 34(6), 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, M. (2000). Portfolio practices in elementary and secondary schools: Toward learner-directed assessment. In G. Ekbatani & H. Pierson (Eds.), Learner-directed assessment in ESL (pp. 89–104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (2014). Exploring language assessment and testing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (1993). Questioning assumptions about portfolio-based assessment. College Composition and Communication, 44(2), 176–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: A catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1181-1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koretz, D. (1998). Large-scale portfolio assessment in the US: Evidence pertaining to the quality of measurement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(3), 309–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R. (2013). The relationship between assessment types and text revision. ELT Journal, 67(4), 446–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I. (2012). Genre-based teaching and assessment in secondary English classrooms. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(4), 120–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., & Wong, K. (2014). Bringing innovation to EFL writing: The case of a primary school in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya, S. S., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). A portfolio assessment model for ESL. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13, 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S., & Underwood, T. (2000). Portfolio practices: Lessons from schools, districts and states. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel, E. (2017). From a culture of testing to a culture of assessment: Implementing writing portfolios in a micro context. In R. Al-Mahrooqi, C. Coombe, F. Al-Maamari, & V. Thakur (Eds.), Revisiting EFL assessment: Critical perspectives (pp. 221–235). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plakans, L. (2009). Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment. Language Testing, 26(4), 561–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2015). Assessment myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N., & Rice, R. (2006). Portfolio keeping: A guide for students (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogier, D. (2014). Assessment literacy: Building a base for better teaching and learning. English Teaching Forum, 52(3), 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. (2011). Are you assessment literate? Some fundamental questions regarding effective classroom-based assessment. On CUE Journal, 3(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricky Lam .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lam, R. (2018). Processes in Portfolio Development Journey. In: Portfolio Assessment for the Teaching and Learning of Writing. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1174-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1174-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1173-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1174-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics