Abstract
This case study presents the flipped classroom (FC) as a framework for a large first-year fundamental engineering practice course (ENGG1200). The aim was to develop student engineers who would leave the course with both the required academic knowledge of materials engineering and the practitioner skills required to apply this knowledge to real-world practices including design, problem-solving, modelling, and professional skills. Using a design approach and drawing on relevant research, a learning environment was constructed whose architecture comprised an integrated set of learning components that would develop within our students the internal mechanisms required for demonstrating these skills. A central component of the learning environment was an authentic open-ended design project that was completed by multidisciplinary teams. Implementation of the course using a FC framework allowed contact time with students to be used for hands-on workshops that developed and scaffolded many of the practitioner skills necessary for the design project. Out-of-class hours were used by students for acquiring the necessary academic knowledge required for the projects, supported by the online learning environment that included modules and quizzes, an organisational tool (the Learning Pathway), reflections, and extensive additional resources. The course design process, the design solution, and the evaluation of the course architecture are described in this chapter along with the characteristics that enabled the learning goals to be achieved. Evaluation revealed two main clusters of associated activities: one around the online learning activities and the other around the hands-on teamwork activities. These clusters were consistent with the design aim of using the course activities to develop a set of internal mechanisms within students such as materials knowledge, self-management, teamwork, and hands-on skills. Furthermore, evaluation of student reflections indicates that students did indeed develop knowledge and skills in these areas as well as modelling, problem-solving, and communication and that they linked concepts with practice. Many aspects of the course design process described here are transferrable to other disciplines aiming to facilitate authentic learning activities using FC approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ABET. (2008). Criteria for accreditation of engineering programs, effective for evaluations during the 2009–2010 cycle. Baltimore, MD: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves. An inquiry into the nature and implication of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
Bradley, A. (2007). Engineers Australia National Generic Competency Standards. In E. A. A. Board (Ed.). Barton: ACT.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A. M., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
Herbert, J., Smith, E., Reidsema, C., & Kavanagh, L. (2013). Helping students find answers: Algorithmic interpretation of student questions. Paper presented at the The Australasian Association of Engineering Education, Gold Coast, Australia.
Kavanagh, L., Harrison, J., Cokley, J., & Neil, D. (In press). Proactively ensuring team success: A guide to effective student project teams in higher education, Instructors Manual.
Pardo, A., Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., & McCredden, J. (In press). Student engagement with online material in engineering courses with a flipped learning methodology.
Pauley, L., Lamancusa, J. S., & Litzinger, T. A. (2005). Using the design process for curriculum improvement. Paper presented at the The 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185–217.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes powerful classrooms and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice, productively intertwined. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 404–412.
Turns, J., Cardella, M., Atman, C. J., Martin, J., Newman, J., & Adams, R. S. (2007). Tackling the research-to-teaching challenge in engineering design education: Making the invisible visible. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 598.
Walther, J., & Radcliffe, D. (2006). Engineering education: Targeted learning outcomes or accidental competencies? Paper presented at the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCredden, J., Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L. (2017). Designing an Active Learning Environment Architecture Within a Flipped Classroom for Developing First Year Student Engineers. In: Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., Hadgraft, R., Smith, N. (eds) The Flipped Classroom. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3411-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3413-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)