Skip to main content

Designing an Active Learning Environment Architecture Within a Flipped Classroom for Developing First Year Student Engineers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Flipped Classroom

Abstract

This case study presents the flipped classroom (FC) as a framework for a large first-year fundamental engineering practice course (ENGG1200). The aim was to develop student engineers who would leave the course with both the required academic knowledge of materials engineering and the practitioner skills required to apply this knowledge to real-world practices including design, problem-solving, modelling, and professional skills. Using a design approach and drawing on relevant research, a learning environment was constructed whose architecture comprised an integrated set of learning components that would develop within our students the internal mechanisms required for demonstrating these skills. A central component of the learning environment was an authentic open-ended design project that was completed by multidisciplinary teams. Implementation of the course using a FC framework allowed contact time with students to be used for hands-on workshops that developed and scaffolded many of the practitioner skills necessary for the design project. Out-of-class hours were used by students for acquiring the necessary academic knowledge required for the projects, supported by the online learning environment that included modules and quizzes, an organisational tool (the Learning Pathway), reflections, and extensive additional resources. The course design process, the design solution, and the evaluation of the course architecture are described in this chapter along with the characteristics that enabled the learning goals to be achieved. Evaluation revealed two main clusters of associated activities: one around the online learning activities and the other around the hands-on teamwork activities. These clusters were consistent with the design aim of using the course activities to develop a set of internal mechanisms within students such as materials knowledge, self-management, teamwork, and hands-on skills. Furthermore, evaluation of student reflections indicates that students did indeed develop knowledge and skills in these areas as well as modelling, problem-solving, and communication and that they linked concepts with practice. Many aspects of the course design process described here are transferrable to other disciplines aiming to facilitate authentic learning activities using FC approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABET. (2008). Criteria for accreditation of engineering programs, effective for evaluations during the 2009–2010 cycle. Baltimore, MD: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves. An inquiry into the nature and implication of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, A. (2007). Engineers Australia National Generic Competency Standards. In E. A. A. Board (Ed.). Barton: ACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A. M., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x

  • Herbert, J., Smith, E., Reidsema, C., & Kavanagh, L. (2013). Helping students find answers: Algorithmic interpretation of student questions. Paper presented at the The Australasian Association of Engineering Education, Gold Coast, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, L., Harrison, J., Cokley, J., & Neil, D. (In press). Proactively ensuring team success: A guide to effective student project teams in higher education, Instructors Manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, A., Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., & McCredden, J. (In press). Student engagement with online material in engineering courses with a flipped learning methodology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauley, L., Lamancusa, J. S., & Litzinger, T. A. (2005). Using the design process for curriculum improvement. Paper presented at the The 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). What makes powerful classrooms and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice, productively intertwined. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 404–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turns, J., Cardella, M., Atman, C. J., Martin, J., Newman, J., & Adams, R. S. (2007). Tackling the research-to-teaching challenge in engineering design education: Making the invisible visible. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J., & Radcliffe, D. (2006). Engineering education: Targeted learning outcomes or accidental competencies? Paper presented at the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie McCredden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCredden, J., Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L. (2017). Designing an Active Learning Environment Architecture Within a Flipped Classroom for Developing First Year Student Engineers. In: Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., Hadgraft, R., Smith, N. (eds) The Flipped Classroom. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3411-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3413-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics