Skip to main content

Reflective and Reflexive Practices in the Flipped Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Flipped Classroom

Abstract

This chapter explores what we are asking students to do in flipped classroom context. We show how we are asking students to independently (but with facilitation) engage with practical and theoretical problems, and how engaging in this independent learning process challenges students to understand themselves differently. This requires the development of two distinct yet overlapping kinds of practices—namely reflective (problem-oriented) and reflexive (self-oriented) practices (Hibbert in J Manage Edu 37:803–827, 2013; Cunliffe in J Manage Edu 28:407–426, 2004; Cunliffe in The Sage handbook of management learning, education and development. Sage, London, pp 405–418, 2009a). We use Knowles et al.’s (The adult learner. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2011) six andragogic principles that characterise adult learners and show how reflective and reflexive practices are involved in helping students to live out these principles in university contexts. In doing so, we outline a developmental trajectory for students, moving from a transactional learning mindset to an exploratory framing of the learning process. This characterisation of the learning process provides an initial overview for educators who seek to develop their approach to reflective teaching, in the context of flipped classrooms. This overview naturally leaves some questions unanswered. So we conclude by offering some suggestions to the most likely three such questions: 1. Application: where might I get more specific, implementable ideas?; 2. Alternatives: is Knowles et al.’s (The adult learner. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2011) framework the only or best way to frame the application of reflective/reflexive practice?; and 3. Adaptation: what might I do to operationalise these ideas in my own classroom contexts?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Hyland-Russell 2014, for an innovative approach that uses a portfolio of text and images.

References

  • Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin, P. (2015). Reflective teaching in higher education. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassiou, N., McNett, J., & Harvey, C. (2003). Critical thinking in the management classroom: Bloom’s taxonomy as a learning tool. Journal of Management Education, 27, 533–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. (2014). Reflective practice: Writing and professional development. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, A. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28, 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, A. (2009a). Reflexivity, learning and reflexive practice. In S. Armstrong & C. Fukami (Eds.), The Sage handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 405–418). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, A. (2009b). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—A critical perspective in teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40, 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehler, G. (2009). Prospects and possibilities of critical management education: Critical beings and a pedagogy of action. Management Learning, 40, 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, F. (2009). Rekindling the sociological imagination as a pedagogical package in management education. Journal of Management Education, 33, 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D. (2007). Facilitating management learning: Developing critical reflection through reflective tools. Management Learning, 38, 495–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, J. (2011). Gadamer’s experience and theory of education: Learning that the other may be right. In P. Fairfield (Ed.), Education, dialogue and hermeneutics (pp. 5–20). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, P. (2013). Approaching reflexivity through critical reflection: issues for critical management education. Journal of Management Education, 37, 803–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, P. & Cunliffe, A. (2015). Responsible management: engaging moral reflexive practice through threshold concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, P., Coupland, C., & MacIntosh, R. (2010). Reflexivity: Recursion and relationality in organizational research processes. Qualitative Research in Organizations & Management, 5(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, P., Siedlok, F., & Beech, N. (2014). The role of interpretation in learning practices, in the context of collaboration. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15, 26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland-Russell, T. (2014). ‘I will write to you with my eyes’: Reflective text and image journals in the undergraduate classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 1055–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (2011). The adult learner (7th ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, K. (2010). Reflexive Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, E. & Wright, A.L. (2015). Using the Everest team simulation to teach threshold concepts. Journal of Management Education, 39, 531–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raelin, J. (2008). Work-based learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2006). Learning for self-direction in the classroom: The pattern of a transition process. Studies in Higher Education, 11, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff Greenfield .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greenfield, G., Hibbert, P. (2017). Reflective and Reflexive Practices in the Flipped Classroom. In: Reidsema, C., Kavanagh, L., Hadgraft, R., Smith, N. (eds) The Flipped Classroom. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3413-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3411-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3413-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics