Abstract
Despite advancing rehabilitation programs, stroke is the most prevalent disease to cause disablement. With the increase of the elderly population, the number of stroke patients increases as well. Although stroke patients at an early stage depend on a stroke unit in the acute hospital, their functional recovery and long-term health status are more affected by subacute rehabilitation hospital. Moreover, a stroke patient’s initial evaluation is crucial for prognosis and establishment of rehabilitation training strategies. The earlier stroke patients start their rehabilitation treatment, the better results they can attain; the recovery from stroke occurs within 3 months after the onset of stroke. Similarly, while neurological and functional recovery occurs in the acute and subacute stages, sometimes, it occurs 6 months after the onset of stroke or in the chronic stage. There are two main mechanisms of neurological recovery. The first is activity-dependent neuroplasticity in the injured cortical representation area, and second is vicariation, which is an operating mechanism as a substitute for the injured brain function in the remnant cortical area, outside of the damaged brain area. This stroke recovery is affected by many factors that influence reorganization of the damaged brain and early rehabilitation; furthermore, intensive rehabilitation and organized enriched environments also significantly affect recovery. In addition, there are substantial researches about new rehabilitation treatment, likely rTMS, tDCT, robotic therapies, mirror therapy, virtual reality, and drug augmentation; therefore, the results of these studies are expected to highlight promising rehabilitation treatments for stroke in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–702.
Tsuji T. Considerations for establishing community liaison for stroke: from a rehabilitation perspective. JMAJ. 2010;53:311–8.
Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:406–12.
Jette AM. Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther. 2006;86:726–34.
Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, et al. ICF core sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2004;44(Suppl):135–41.
Chan DK, Cordato D, O’Rourke F, et al. Comprehensive stroke units: a review of comparative evidence and experience. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:260–4.
Wieloch T, Nikolich K. Mechanisms of neural plasticity following brain injury. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16:258–64.
Nudo RJ. Adaptive plasticity in motor cortex: implications for rehabilitation after brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2003;41(Suppl):7–10.
Cotman CW, Berchtold NC. Exercise: a behavioral intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:295–301.
Tyson SF, Sadeghi-Demneh E, Nester CJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on gait biomechanics after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:879–91.
Knutson JS, Fu MJ, Sheffler LR, et al. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for motor restoration in hemiplegia. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015;26:729–45.
AVERT Trial Collaboration group, Bernhardt J, Langhorne P, et al. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:46–55.
Biernaskie J, Chernenko G, Corbett D. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci 2004;24:1245–54.
Lindsay P, Bayley M, Hellings C, et al. Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care (updated 2008). CMAJ. 2008;179:S1.
Kang N, Summers JJ, Cauraugh JH. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:345–55.
Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007;3:383–93.
Kwon SY, Hong SE, Kim EJ, et al. Monitoring of functioning status in subjects with chronic stroke in south Korea using WHODAS II. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40:111–9.
Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:708–12.
Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, et al. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:393–8.
Fu MJ, Knutson JS, Chae J. Stroke rehabilitation using virtual environments. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015;26:747–57.
Berthier ML, Green C, Lara JP, et al. Memantine and constraint-induced aphasia therapy in chronic post stroke aphasia. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:577–85.
Chollet F, Tardy J, Albucher JF, et al. Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischemic stroke (FLAME): a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:123–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jung, HY. (2017). Rehabilitation in Subacute and Chronic Stage After Stroke. In: Lee, SH. (eds) Stroke Revisited: Diagnosis and Treatment of Ischemic Stroke. Stroke Revisited. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1424-6_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1424-6_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1423-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1424-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)