Abstract
The nature of authority in medical decisions is a subject of current controversy. In their analyses of medical authority, Richard Flathman in “Power, Authority, and Rights in the Practice of Medicine” and Stanley Hauerwas in “Authority and the Profession of Medicine” have contributed to advancing the debate. In spite of their apparently diverging analyses and proposed solutions, they share much in common. Both are acutely aware that the authority of the medical professional has seen hard times recently. Both recognize that historical notions of physician authority grounded in technical expertise and skill are not an adequate basis for authority. Both appear compelled to salvage some residual element of legitimate professional medical authority. And both make interesting attempts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Veatch, R.M. (1982). Medical Authority and Professional Medical Authority: The Nature of Authority in Medicine for Decisions by Lay Persons and Professionals. In: Agich, G.J. (eds) Responsibility in Health Care. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7831-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7831-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7833-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7831-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive