Skip to main content

Farms: Small Versus Large

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics
  • 82 Accesses

Synonyms

Farms: operations; Large: corporate; Small: hobby

Introduction

The industrialization of agriculture has created a farm structure where a small percentage of large farms account for a large percentage of sales and a large percentage of small farms account for a small percentage of sales. In general, these large farms produce for indirect global commodity markets, while the small farms participate in direct sales markets. In between are the shrinking mid-sized farms that are too small for commodity markets but too large for direct markets. While explained by some scientists as progress and supported by productivist perspectives of agrifood production, the industrialization of agriculture has important negative implications for the quality of life in rural communities in particular and society in general. This entry applies a Sociology of Agriculture conceptual frame to the case of the changing structure of agriculture in the USA to inform discussions regarding ethical dimensions...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, P. (2005). Together at the table: Sustenance and sustainability in the American agrifood system. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann, A. (2006). Real American ethics: Taking responsibility for our country. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F. H. (1987). New directions in environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 465–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F., & Newby, H. (Eds.). (1980). The rural sociology of advanced societies: Critical perspectives. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld and Osmun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constance, D. (2008). The emancipatory question: The next step in the sociology of agrifood systems. Agriculture, Food, and Human Values, 25, 151–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., & Korzeniewiez, M. (1994). Commodity chains and global capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, W. (1947). As you sow. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2004). Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, W. D. (2000). Concentration of ownership in agriculture. In F. Magdoff, J. B. Foster, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat to farmers, food, and the environment. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, C. C., & Lyson, T. (Eds.). (2009). Remaking the North American food system: Strategies for sustainability. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobao, L. (1990). Locality and inequality: Farm structure, industry structure, and socioeconomic conditions. Albany, NY: The State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyson, T. (2004). Civic agriculture: Reconnecting farm, food, and community. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyson, T., Stevenson, G. W., & Welsh, R. (Eds.). (2010). Food and the mid-level farm: Renewing an agriculture of the middle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magdoff, F., Bellamy Foster, J., & Buttel, F. H. (Eds.). (2000). Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat to farmers, food, and the environment. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K., Marsden, T., & Murdoch, J. (2006). Worlds of food: Place, provenance, and power in the food chain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2010). Toward sustainable agricultural systems in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L., Murray, D., & Wilkinson, J. (Eds.). (2007). Fair trade: The challenges of transforming globalization. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (2010). The agrarian vision: Sustainability and environmental ethics. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). (2012). 2007 census of agriculture. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov

  • Wittman, H., Desmarais, A., & Wiebe, N. (Eds.). (2010). Food sovereignty: Reconnecting food, nature and community. Black Point, NS: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas H. Constance .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Constance, D.H. (2014). Farms: Small Versus Large. In: Thompson, P., Kaplan, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_84-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_84-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6167-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics