Skip to main content

Partnerships in Policy: What Lessons Can We Learn from IPY SIKU?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
SIKU: Knowing Our Ice

Abstract

The role and participation of indigenous peoples in international arctic policy matters represents a critical element of meeting the future governance challenges in the region. This chapter describes how the nature of partnerships between scientists and northern indigenous peoples can serve as a model for partnerships of a more political nature. Such partnerships, like those developed as part of IPY SIKU, increasingly have a commitment to sharing and reciprocity that is grounded by in-depth documentation of indigenous knowledge, intergenerational engagement, and investments in capacity. Using the Arctic Council and the status of Permanent Participants as a case study, the chapter examines the current challenges and opportunities in translating these kinds of partnerships into an international policy context. It argues that opportunities for political partnerships between indigenous peoples and nation-states do have the potential to grow if these core tenants are supported.

As states increasingly focus on the Arctic and its resources, and as climate change continues to create easier access to the Arctic, Inuit inclusion as active partners is central to all national and international deliberations on Arctic sovereignty and related questions, such as who owns the Arctic, who has the right to traverse the Arctic, who has the right to develop the Arctic, and who will be responsible for the social and environmental impacts increasingly facing the Arctic. We have unique knowledge and experience to bring to these deliberations. The inclusion of Inuit as active partners in all future deliberations on Arctic sovereignty will benefit both the Inuit community and the international community.

Circumpolar Inuit Declaration on Sovereignty in the Arctic 2009

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawal, A. 1995. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change 26: 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexie, E. 2009. Arctic indigenous peoples and the reconciliation of the past and present. In Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers and Prospects. F. Abele, T.J. Courchene, F.L. Seidle, and F. St. Hilaire (eds.), Montreal, QB, Canada: The Institute for Research and Public Policy, pp. 501–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aporta, C. 2006. “Anijaarniq: Introducing Inuit Landskill and Wayfinding. Multimedia CD-ROM Released by the Department of Education, Nunavut Government and the Nunavut Research Institute, Iqaluit, NT, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, P. and Young, O. 2009. Governance and environmental change in the Arctic Ocean. Science 324, Apr 17: 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, M. 2009. Arctic science, nation-building and citizenship. In Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers and Prospects. F. Abele, T.J. Courchene, F.L. Seidle, and F. St. Hilaire (eds.), Montreal, QB, Canada: The Institute for Research and Public Policy, pp. 141–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, R., M’Lot, M., and McLachlan, S. 2006. Pitfalls to avoid when linking traditional and scientific knowledge. In Climate Change: Linking Traditional and Scientific Knowledge. R. Riewe and J. Oakes (eds.), Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, Aboriginal Issues Press, pp. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S. 2005. Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic 58(1): 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. and the community of Arctic Bay. 2006a. Hunting on thin ice: Risks associated with the Arctic Bay narwhal hunt. In Climate Change: Linking Traditional and Scientific Knowledge. R. Riewe and J. Oakes (eds.), Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, Aboriginal Issues Press, pp. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. and the community of Igloolik. 2006b. Sensitivity of Iglulingmiut hunters to hazards associated with climate change. In Climate Change: Linking Traditional and Scientific Knowledge. R. Riewe and J. Oakes (eds.), Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, Aboriginal Issues Press, pp. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. 2003. When the Weather is uggianaqtuq: Inuit Observations of Environmental Change. University of Colorado Geography Department Cartography Lab. Distributed by National Snow and Ice Data Center. CD-ROM, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearheard, S., Matumeak, W., Angutikjuaq, I., Maslanik, J., Huntington, H.P., Leavitt, J., Matumeak Kagak, D., Tigullaraq, G., and Barry, R.G. 2006. “It’s not that simple”: A comparison of sea ice environments, uses of sea ice, and vulnerability to change in Barrow, Alaska, USA, and Clyde River, Nunavut, Canada. Ambio 35(4): 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gearheard, S. and Shirley, J. 2007. Challenges in community-research relationships: Learning from natural science in Nunavut. Arctic 60(1): 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, G., Mallory, M., and Merkel, F. 2005. Can local ecological knowledge contribute to wildlife management? Case studies of migratory birds. Ecology and Society 10(1): 20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art20/ (Accessed April 4, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, U. 2009. The next generation. In Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers and Prospects. F. Abele, T.J. Courchene, F.L. Seidle, and F. St. Hilaire (eds.), Montreal, QB, Canada: The Institute for Research and Public Policy, pp. 389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, A. 2006a. Learning landscapes: Pausing along the journey: Learning landscapes, environmental change and place names amongst the Sikusilarmiut. Arctic Anthropology 43(1): 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, A. 2006b. Winds of change: Weather knowledge amongst the Sikusilarmiut. In Climate Change: Linking Traditional and ScientifiC Knowledge. R. Riewe and J. Oakes (eds.), Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, Aboriginal Issues Press, pp. 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, A. 2009. Sea ice: The sociocultural dimensions of a melting environment in the Arctic. In Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions. S.A. Crate and M. Nuttall (eds.), Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, pp. 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, A. and Ashoona, A. 2006. Learning landscapes: place, time and place names amongst Sikusilarmiut of Nunavut. Paper presented at the 15th Inuit Studies Conference, Paris, France. October 26–28, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, A., Ashoona, A., and Gilbert, C. 2007. Inuktitut Place Names, Sikusiilarmiut, Nunavut. Open Files 5615–5620, Scale 1:250,000. Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebert, R. 2009. Science, cooperation and conflict in the polar region. In Legacies and Change in Polar Sciences: Historical, Legal and Political Reflections. J. Shadian and M. Tennberg (eds.), Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited, pp. 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, H.P. 1998. Observations on the utility of the semi-directive interview for documenting traditional ecological knowledge. Arctic 51(3): 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, H.P. 2000. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: Methods and applications. Ecological Applications 10: 1270–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, H.P., Brown-Schwalenberg, P.K., Fernandez-Gimenez, M.E., Frost, K.J., Norton, D.W., and Rosenberg, D.H. 2002. Observations on the workshop as a means of improving communication between holders of traditional and scientific knowledge. Environmental Management 30(6): 778–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, H. and Fox, S. (Lead Authors). 2005. The changing Arctic: Indigenous perspectives. In Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabour, J. and Weber, M. 2008. Is it time to cut the Gordian knot of polar sovereignty? Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 17(1): 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, W. 1976. Inuit land use in south and east Baffin Island. In Inuit Land Use and Occupancy Project. M. Freeman (ed.), Department of Indian and Northern Affairs: Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova, T. 2008. Alternatives for an Arctic treaty – Evaluation and a new proposal. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 17(1): 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupnik, I., Bravo, M., Csonka, Y., Hovelsrud-Broda, G., Müller-Wille, L., Poppel, B., Schweitzer, P., and Sörlin, S. 2005. Social sciences and humanities in the International Polar Year 2007–2008: An integrating mission. Arctic 58(1): 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, G.J. and Elee, P. 2006. Sea ice processes and change: Exposure and risk in Cape Dorset. In Climate Change: Linking Traditional and Scientific Knowledge. R. Riewe and J. Oakes (eds.), Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, Aboriginal Issues Press, pp. 55–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth, M. 2006. Arctic Indigenous Peoples’ Organizations in Arctic and Global Arenas: Indigenous NGOs in Intergovernmental Organizations. Abstract from the Conference Proceedings of the International Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M., Arragutainaq, L., and Novalinga, Z. 1997. Voices from the Bay: Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Inuit and Cree. Canadian Arctic Resource Committee and Environmental Committee of Municipality of Sanikiliuaq, Ottawa, Ontario and Sanikiluaq, N.W.T.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehdi, B., Mrena, C., and Douglas, A. 2006. Adapting to Climate Change: An Introduction for Canadian Municipalities C-CAIRN (Canadian Climate Impacts and Adaptation Network).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, W.N., Stroeve, J., and Gearheard, S. 2006. Bridging perspectives from remote sensing and Inuit communities on changing sea ice cover in the Baffin Bay region. Annals of Glaciology 44(1): 433–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadasdy, P. 1999. The politics of TEK: Power and the “integration” of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology 36: 118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, A. 2009. A changing Arctic climate: More than just the weather. In Legacies and Change in Polar Sciences: Historical, Legal and Political Reflections. J. Shadian and M. Tennberg (eds.), Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited, pp. 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, M. 2009. Living in a World of movement: Human resilience to environmental instability in Greenland. In Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions. S.A. Crate and M. Nuttall (eds.), Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, pp. 292–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obed, N. 2009. Inuit values and the implementation of land claims agreements. In Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers and Prospects. F. Abele, T.J. Courchene, F.L. Seidle, and F. St. Hilaire (eds.), Montreal, QB, Canada: The Institute for Research and Public Policy, pp. 511–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oozeva, C., Chester, N., George, N., Christina, A., and Igor, K. 2004. Watchng Ice and Weather Our Way/ Sikumengllu Eslamengllu Esghapalleghput. Washington and Savoonga: Arctic Studies Center, Smithsonian Institution and Savoonga Whaling Captain Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayfuse, R. 2008. Protecting marine biodiversity in polar areas beyond national jurisdictions. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 17(1): 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenova, T. 2005. Indigenous Organizations as Participants to the Arctic Council. Abstract from Conference Proceedings International Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadian, J. 2006. Remaking Arctic governance: The construction of an Arctic Inuit polity. Polar Record 42(222): 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadian, J. 2009. Revisiting politics and science in the poles: IPY and governance of science post Westphalia. In Legacies and Change in Polar Sciences: Historical, Legal and Political Reflections. J. Shadian and M. Tennberg (eds.), Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited, pp. 35–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillitoe, P. 1998. The development of indigenous knowledge: A new applied anthropology. Current Anthropology 39(2): 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M., Furgal, C., LaFortune, V., Larrivée, C., Savard, J.-P., Barrett, M., Annanack, T., Enish, N., Tookalook, P., and Etidloie, B. 2006. Communities and ice: Linking traditional and scientific knowledge. In Climate Change: Linking Traditional and Scientific Knowledge. R. Riewe and J. Oakes (eds.), Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, Aboriginal Issues Press, pp. 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt-Cloutier, S. 2009. A principled path. In Northern Exposure: Peoples, Powers and Prospects. F. Abele, T.J. Courchene, F.L. Seidle, and F. St. Hilaire (eds.), Montreal, QB, Canada: The Institute for Research and Public Policy, pp. 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. 1992. Arctic Politics: Conflict and Cooperation in the Circumpolar North. Hanover: University of New England Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. 1998. Creating Regimes: Arctic Accords and International Governance. Ithica: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. 2009. Whither the Arctic? Conflict or Cooperation in the Circumpolar North. Polar Record 45: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research conducted as part of the Sikusiilarmiut Place-Name Project was supported through grants made by the National Science Foundation; the Nunavut Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth; and the Geological Survey of Canada. I would like to thank the Community of Cape Dorset for their support of the Sikusiilarmiut Place-name Project and I would like particularly acknowledge the hard work of my colleague, interpreter, and friend Aksatungua Ashoona. I would particularly like to thank Victoria Gofman (AIA) and Jimmy Stotts (ICC) for sharing their insights into the role of Permanent Participants on the Arctic Council and for providing helpful comments on this chapter. Igor Krupnik, Oran Young, and Shari Gearheard also kindly read and provided feedback on drafts of this chapter; I particularly want to thank Igor, without his encouragement this manuscript would not have been written.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Henshaw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henshaw, A. (2010). Partnerships in Policy: What Lessons Can We Learn from IPY SIKU?. In: Krupnik, I., Aporta, C., Gearheard, S., Laidler, G., Kielsen Holm, L. (eds) SIKU: Knowing Our Ice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8587-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics