Skip to main content

Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Introduction

  • Chapter
Pelvic Floor Disorders

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) represents a significant health as well as economic problem worldwide and may have a deleterious impact on a woman’s quality of life; however, it rarely has significant morbidity or mortality. It is estimated that 25% of women older than 60 years suffer from some degree of POP, and more than 300,000 operations for POP are performed annually in the US alone [1, 2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Men L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:108–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for urinary incontinence in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:70–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tegerstedt G. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of pelvic floor dysfunction. Thesis. Stockholm: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stockholm Söder Hospital Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Söder Hospital, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Norton PA. Pelvic floor disorders: the role of fascia and ligaments. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36:926–938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLancey JO. The anatomy of the pelvic floor. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1994;6:313–316.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson SL, Weber AM, Hull TL et al. Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:423–427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Holmstrom B et al. Obstetric sphincter tears and anal incontinence: an observational followup study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:921–928.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston S. Urogenital health. J Obstet Gynecol Can 2001;23:973–977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brubaker L, Bump R, Jacquetin B et al. (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury A. Incontinence. 2 edn. Health Publication Ltd, Plymouth, pp 243–265.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ellerkmann RM, Cundiff GW, Melick CF et al. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1332–1337; discussion 1337–1338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barrington JW, Edwards G. Posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunc 2000;11:241–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yanik FF, Akpolat T, Kocak I. Acute renal failure-an unusual consequence of uterine prolapse. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:2648–2650.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw W. The Manchester Operation for Genital Prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Brit Emp 1947;54:633–635.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:372–377; discussion 377–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Swift S, Pound T, Dias J. Case-control study of the etiology of severe pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2001;12:176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Otto L, Urankar R, Clark A. Correlation of symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse to clinical stage [Abstract]. Int Urogynecol J 1999;10(suppl 1):S25.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Samuelsson EU, Victor FTA, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:299–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bland DR, Earle BB, Vitolins MZ, Burke G. Use of the pelvic organ prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1324–1328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Versi E, Harvey M, Cardozo L et al. Urogenital prolapse and atrophy at menopause: a prevalence study. Int Urogynecol J 2001;12:107–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Muir TW, Stepp KJ, Barber MD. Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1632–1635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M. Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observation from the Oxford Family Planning Association study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:579–585.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rinne KM, Kirkinen PP. What predisposes young women to genital prolapse? Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 1999;84:23–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Davis GD. Uterine prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral transection in nulliparous airborne trainees: a report of three cases. J Reprod Med 1996;41:279–282.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jorgensen S, Hein HO, Gyntelberg F. Heavy lifting at work and risk of genital prolapse and herniated lumbar disc in assistant nurses. Occup Med 1994;44:47–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lubowski DZ, Swash M, Nichols J, Henry MM. Increases in pudendal nerve terminal motor latency with defecation straining. Br J Surg 1988;75:1095–1097.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen JK, Lind LR, Choe JY et al. Lumbosacral spine and pelvic inlet changes associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:332–336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:L277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:501–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Progetto Menopausa Italia Study Group. Risk factors for genital prolapse in non-hysterectomized women around menopause-results from a large cross-sectional study in menopausal clinics in Italy. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 2000;93:124–140.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Koduri S, Sand PK. Recent developments in pelvic organ prolapse. Cur Opin Obstet Gynecol 2000;12:399–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Norton PA, Baker JE, Sharp HC, Warenski JC. Genitourinary prolapse and joint hypermobility in women. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:225–228.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jackson SR, Avery NC, Tarlton JF et al. Changes in metabolism of collagen in genitourinary prolapse. Lancet 1996;347:1658–1661.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Makinen J, Soderstrom KO, Kiilholma P, Hirvonen T. Histological changes in the vaginal connective tissue of patients with and without uterine prolapse. Arch Gynecol 1986;239:17–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McIntosh LJ, Stanitski DF, Mallett VT et al. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: relationship between joint hypermobility, urinary incontinence, and pelvic floor prolapse. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996;41:135–139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. McIntosh LJ, Mallett VT, Frahm JD et al. Gynecologic disorders in women with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Soc Gynecol Investig 1995;2:559–564.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu X, Zhao Y, Gao J et al. Elastic fiber homeostasis requires lysyl oxidase-like 1 protein. Nat Genet 2004;36:178–182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Carley ME, Schaffer J. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse with Marfan or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1021–1023.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Allen-Brady K, Norton PA, Farnham JM et al. Significant evidence for a predisposition gene for pelvic floor disorders on chromosome 9. Am J Hum Genet 2009;84:678–682.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Epstein LB, Graham CA, Heit MH. Systemic and vaginal biomechanical properties of women with normal vaginal support and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:165.e1–165.e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Emge LA, Durfee RB. Pelvic organ prolapse: four thousand years of treatment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1966;9:997–1032.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Baden WF, Walker TA. Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1972;15:1048–1054.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beecham CT. Classification of vaginal relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:957–958.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Theofrastous JP, Swift SE. The clinical evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 25:783–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction, Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GC et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175: 1467–1471.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kobak WH, Rosenberger K, Walters MD. Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 1996;7:121–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Davila GW, Guerette N. Current treatment options for female urinary incontinence — a review. Int J Fertil Womens Med 2004;49:102–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Birch C, Fynes MM. The role of synthetic and biological prostheses in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002;14:527–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Luber KM, Boero S, Choe JY. The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1496–1501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. DeLancey JOL. The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1488–1495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Abramowitch SD, Feola A, Jallah ZA, Moalli PA. Tissue mechanics, animal models, and pelvic organ prolapse: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;144S:S146–S158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rechberger, T. (2010). Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Introduction. In: Santoro, G.A., Wieczorek, A.P., Bartram, C.I. (eds) Pelvic Floor Disorders. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1542-5_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1542-5_52

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1541-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1542-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics