Skip to main content
  • 2329 Accesses

Abstract

Conflicts of interest lead to bias, which in turn leads to compromised research integrity and quality. Conflicts are not binary; that is, they are not simply either present or absent. They can be more or less severe. The severity of a conflict depends on the likelihood that professional decisions made under the relevant circumstances would be unduly influenced by a secondary interest and the seriousness of the harm or wrong that could result from such influence upon patients and researchers alike. Conflict of interest can present in both financial and intellectual form. Recognition, consequences, and a general approach to management of conflict of interest in medical research are presented in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Australian Research Council. ARC conflict of interests and confidentiality policy Version 2017.1. http://www.arc.gov.au/arc-conflict-interest-and-confidentiality-policy-version-20171.

  2. Battelle. 2014 Global R&D funding forecast. R&D Magazine. 2013. https://www.battelle.org/docs/default-source/misc/2014-rd-funding-forecast.pdf?sfvrsn=2.

  3. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289:454–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.4.454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cain DM, Detsky AS. Everyone’s a little bit biased (even physicians). JAMA. 2008;299:2893–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.24.2893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cosgrove L, Bursztajn HJ, Erlich DR, Wheeler EE, Shaughnessy AF. Conflicts of interest and the quality of recommendations in clinical guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19:674–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Melo-Martín I, Intemann K. How do disclosure policies fail? Let us count the ways. FASEB J. 2009;23:1638–42. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-125963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dickerson P, Chappell K. Content integrity, conflict of interest, and commercial support: defining and operationalizing the terms. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2015;31:225–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. PART 50—Policies of general applicability. Subpart F—Promoting objectivity in research. https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=b17a2b836d6343b5c359269f32ed5ccb&mc=true&node=pt42.1.50&rgn=div5#sp42.1.50.f.

  9. Guyatt G, Akl EA, Hirsh J, Kearon C, Crowther M, Gutterman D, et al. The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:738–41. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kulkarni AV, Busse JW, Shams I. Characteristics associated with citation rate of the medical literature. PLoS One. 2007;2:e403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lach HW. Financial conflicts of interest in research: recognition and management. Nurs Res. 2014;63:228–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee K, Bacchetti P, Sim I. Publication of clinical trials supporting successful new drug applications: a literature analysis. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Licurse A, Barber E, Joffe S, Gross C. The impact of disclosing financial ties in research and clinical care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:675–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Loewenstein G, Sah S, Cain DM. The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. JAMA. 2012;307:669–70. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marcovitch H, Barbour V, Borrell C, Bosch F, Fernández E, Macdonald H, Marusić A, Nylenna M, Esteve Foundation Discussion Group. Conflict of interest in science communication: more than a financial issue. Report from Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, April 2009. Croat Med J. 2010;51:7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Brien L, Lakeman R, O’Brien A. Managing potential conflict of interest in journal article publication. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2013;22:368–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0349.2012.00869.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okike K, Kocher MS, Torpey JL, Nwachukwu BU, Mehlman CT, Bhandari M. Level of evidence and conflict of interest disclosure associated with higher citation rates in orthopedics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:331–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Resnik DB, Elliott KC. Taking financial relationships into account when assessing research. Account Res. 2013;20:184–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2013.788383.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Resnik DB. Science and money: problems and solutions. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014;15:159–61. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.792.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rockey SJ, Collins FS. Managing financial conflict of interest in biomedical research. JAMA. 2010;303:2400–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Schott G, Pachl H, Limbach U, Gundert-Remy U, Ludwig WD, Lieb K. The financing of drug trials by pharmaceutical companies and its consequences. Part 1: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature on possible influences on the findings, protocols, and quality of drug trials. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107:279–85. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Thagard P. The moral psychology of conflicts of interest: insights from affective neuroscience. J Appl Philos. 2007;24:367–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00382.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Hantes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 ISAKOS

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hantes, M., Fyllos, A. (2019). Conflict of Interest. In: Musahl, V., et al. Basic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58253-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58254-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics