Skip to main content

Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) and Microdissection-Based CGH (Micro-CGH)

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)

Part of the book series: Springer Protocols Handbooks ((SPH))

  • 3134 Accesses

Abstract

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) can be used for comprehensive low-resolution analysis of chromosomal imbalances of an entire human genome. Genomic DNAs from a tested specimen (test DNA) and a normal one (reference DNA) are differentially labeled and simultaneously hybridized to normal metaphase spreads. The ratio of fluorescence intensities along each normal chromosome is analyzed and allows the detection of regions that are over- or underrepresented in the tested specimen. Even though higher-resolution array CGH is nowadays widely used instead of CGH, this molecular cytogenetic approach should not be forgotten, as it can be performed also by labs only equipped with a 3-filter fluorescence microscope. In this chapter we describe the technique of CGH itself and a variant of it. The so-called microdissection-based comparative genomic hybridization (micro-CGH) technique allows the molecular cytogenetic investigation of harvested and cytogenetically fixed interphase nuclei. Micro-CGH has been already used in leukemia cytogenetics as well as clinical genetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D et al (1992) Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumours. Science 258:818–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gebhart E, Liehr T (2000) Patterns of genomic imbalances in human solid tumors (review). Int J Oncol 16:383–399

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniely M, Aviram-Goldring A, Barkai G et al (1998) Detection of chromosomal aberration in fetuses arising from recurrent spontaneous abortion by comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 13:805–809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanlaville D, Baumann C, Lapierre JM et al (1999) De novo inverted duplication 9p21pter involving telomeric repeated sequences. Am J Med Genet 83:125–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Speicher MR, du Manoir S, Schröck E et al (1993) Molecular cytogenetic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded solid tumors by comparative genomic hybridization after universal DNA-amplification. Hum Mol Genet 2:1907–1914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knuutila S, Björkqvist AM, Autio K et al (1998) DNA copy number amplifications in human neoplasms: review of comparative genomic hybridization studies. Am J Pathol 152:1107–1123

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gebhart E (2004) Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH): ten years of substantial progress in human solid tumor molecular cytogenetics. Cytogenet Genome Res 104:352–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heller A, Chudoba I, Bleck C et al (2000) Microdissection based comparative genomic hybridization analysis (micro-CGH) of secondary acute myelogenous leukemias. Int J Oncol 16:461–468

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karst C, Heller A, Claussen U et al (2005) Detection of cryptic chromosomal aberrations in the in vitro non-proliferating cells of acute myeloid leukemia. Int J Oncol 27:355–359

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kearney L, Horsley SW (2005) Molecular cytogenetics in haematological malignancy: current technology and future prospects. Chromosoma 114:286–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gebhart E (2005) Genomic imbalances in human leukemia and lymphoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Int J Oncol 27:593–606

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Albertson DG, Pinkel D (2003) Genomic microarrays in human genetic disease and cancer. Hum Mol Genet 12 (Spec No 2):R145–R152

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paulsson K, Heidenblad M, Mörse H et al (2006) Identification of cryptic aberrations and characterization of translocation breakpoints using array CGH in high hyperdiploid childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 20:2002–2007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van Beers EH, Nederlof PM (2006) Array-CGH and breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 8:210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Klijn C, Holstege H, de Ridder J et al (2008) Identification of cancer genes using a statistical framework for multiexperiment analysis of nondiscretized array CGH data. Nucleic Acids Res 36:e13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Veken LT, Buijs A (2011) Array CGH in human leukemia: from somatics to genetics. Cytogenet Genome Res 135:260–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mocellin S, Rossi CR (2007) Principles of gene microarray data analysis. Adv Exp Med Biol 593:19–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chudoba I, Henn TK, Senger G et al (1997) Comparative genomic hybridization using DOP-PCR amplified DNA from small number of nuclei. Cs Pediatr 52:519–521

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heller A, Fricke HJ, Starke H et al (2004) Characterization of a highly aberrant plasma cell leukemia karyotype: a case report. Oncol Rep 11:89–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Starke H, Raida M, Trifonov V et al (2001) Molecular cytogenetic characterization of an acquired minute supernumerary marker chromosome as the sole abnormality in a case clinically diagnosed as atypical Philadelphia-negative chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Br J Haematol 113:435–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heller A, Seidel J, Hübler A et al (2000) Molecular cytogenetic characterisation of partial trisomy 9q in a case with pyloric stenosis and a review. J Med Genet 37:529–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liehr T, Heller A, Starke H et al (2002) High quality CGH slides irrespective of used lymphocyte suspension. TTO 1(138), T02436

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Liehr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Liehr, T., Glaser, A., Kosyakova, N. (2017). Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) and Microdissection-Based CGH (Micro-CGH). In: Liehr, T. (eds) Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH). Springer Protocols Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52959-1_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52959-1_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-52957-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-52959-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics