Skip to main content

Three-Dimensional Imaging and Virtual Reality Applications of Multislice Computed Tomography

  • Conference paper
Multislice CT: A Practical Guide

Abstract

A few years ago, a discussion of three-dimensional (3D) and virtual reality imaging might have been overly futuristic and perhaps of marginal interest to those in clinical practice. However, the rapid rise of techniques, such as computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and the development of multislice CT (MSCT) with data files that now reach a thousand slices per data set, demand 3D solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berland LL, Smith JK (1998) Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities (editorial; comment). Radiology 209: 327–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Klingenbeck-Regn K, et al. (1999) Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. Eur J Radiol 31: 110–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu H, et al. (2000) Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology 215: 55–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Disler DG, Marr DS, Rosenthal DI (1994) Accuracy of volume measurements of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging phantoms by three-dimensional reconstruction and preliminary clinical application. Invest Radiol 29: 739–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pfeifer T, et al. (1992) The value of tumor volumetry as opposed to bidimensional determination of tumor size during follow-up of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 157: 548–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Horton KM, Fishman EK (2000) 3D CT angiography of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries with multidetector CT data sets: preliminary observations. Abdom Imaging 25: 523–525

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Glenn WV Jr, et al. (1975) 1975 Memorial award paper. Image generation and display techniques for CT scan data. Thin transverse and reconstructed coronal and sagittal planes. Invest Radiol 10:403–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorenson WE, Cline HE (1987) Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Computer graphics. Proc SIGGRAPH’87 21: 163–169

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guy RL, et al. (1992) The role of 3D CT in the assessment of acetabular fractures. Br J Radiol 65: 384–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Martinez CR, et al. (1992) Evaluation of acetabular fractures with two- and three-dimensional CT. Radiographics 12: 227–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hufner T, et al. (1999) The value of CT in classification and decision making in acetabulum fractures. A systematic analysis. Unfallchirurg 102: 124–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marsh JL, et al. (1986) Applications of computer graphics in craniofacial surgery. Clin Plast Surg 13: 441–448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fukuta K, et al. (1990) Three-dimensional imaging in craniofacial surgery: a review of the role of mirror image production. Eur J Plastic Surg 13: 209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeman RK, et al. (1995) Diagnosis of aortic dissection: value of helical CT with multiplanar reformation and three-dimensional rendering. AIR Am J Roentgenol 164: 1375–1380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Calhoun PS, et al. (1999) Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics 19: 745–764

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pretorius ES, Fishman EK (1999) Volume-rendered three-dimensional spiral CT: musculoskeletal applications. Radiographics 19: 1143–1160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vining DJ (1996) Virtual endoscopy: is it reality? Comment on: Radiology 1996 200:49–54. Radiology 200: 30–31

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robb RA (2000) Virtual endoscopy: development and çvaluation using the visible human data-sets. Comput Med Imaging Graph 24: 133–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin GD, et al. (1996) Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology 199: 321–330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schreyer AG, et al. (2000) Virtual CT cystoscopy: color mapping of bladder wall thickness (in process citation). Invest Radiol 35: 331–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. NCI (1999) Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER).http://www.seer.ims.nci.nih.gov.com

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vogelstein B, et al. (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 319: 525–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Toribara NW Sleisenger MH (1995) Screening for colorectal cancer (see comments). N Engl J Med 332: 861–867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Winawer SJ, et al. (1996) Prevention of colorectal carcinoma. Current WHO guidelines for early detection of colorectal carcinoma. World Health Organization Collaborating Center for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Leber Magen Darm 26: 139–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vining DJ (1997) Virtual colonoscopy 7: 285–291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fenlon HM, et al. (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps (see comments; published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 2000 342:524). N Engl J Med 341: 1496–1503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fletcher JG, Luboldt W (2000) CT colonography and MR colonography: current status, research directions and comparison. Eur Radiol 10: 786–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Luboldt W, et al. (1997) Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders 349: 1288–1291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Luboldt W, et al. (2000) Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 216: 383–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Karadi C, et al. (1999) Display modes for CT colonography. Part I. Synthesis and insertion of polyps into patient CT data. Radiology 212: 195–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Beaulieu CF, et al. (1999) Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies. Radiology 212: 203–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Quint LE, et al. (1995) Stenosis of the central airways: evaluation by using helical CT with multi-planar reconstructions. Radiology 194: 871–877

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wildermuth S, et al. (2000) Interactive planning system for endobronchial stent placement based on virtual bronchoscopic rendering of multislice CT datasets.(in press)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wildermuth S, et al. (2000) Preoperative endoluminal aortic stent planning on a virtual angioscopic rendering system based on multidetector CT angiography. In ECR. Eur J Radiol 10 [suppl]: 245

    Google Scholar 

  35. Alberti C (1980) Three-dimensional CT and structure models (letter). Br J Radiol 53: 261–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Robb RA, Hanson DP, Camp JJ (1996) Computer-aided surgery planning and rehearsal at Mayo Clinic. Computer 29: 39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Satava RM (1995) Medical applications of virtual reality. J Med Syst 19: 275–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bruyns C, Montgomery K, Wildermuth S (2000) Advanced astronaut training/simulation system for rat dissection and surgical simulation. In SMARTSYSTEMS 2000; the International Conference for Smart Systems and Robotics in Space and Medicine. Johnson Space Center, Houston, USA: NASA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wildermuth, S., Teodorovic, N., Hilfiker, P.R., Marincek, B. (2001). Three-Dimensional Imaging and Virtual Reality Applications of Multislice Computed Tomography. In: Marincek, B., Ros, P.R., Reiser, M., Baker, M.E. (eds) Multislice CT: A Practical Guide. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59450-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59450-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63979-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59450-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics