Skip to main content

The Antebellum US Economy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Cliometrics
  • 1753 Accesses

Abstract

In the antebellum era, the economy of the United States underwent an acceleration of economic growth. Cliometric studies have established not only that growth predated the Civil War but that many features prominent in later years – commercialization of agriculture, urbanization, the rise of manufacturing, and mass European immigration – were clearly visible in the antebellum period. This chapter reviews and summarizes this body of research. A notable dimension of this history is that growth and development transpired under two distinct regimes: the slave economy of the southern states and the family-farm, wage labor economy of the free states. This experiment in comparative development has also been a focus of cliometric attention and thus provides a second theme for the essay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams DR (1980) American neutrality and prosperity, 1793–1808: a reconsideration. J Econ Hist 40:713–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ames E, Rosenberg N (1968) The Enfield Arsenal in theory and history. Econ J 78:827–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atack J, Bateman F (1987) To their own soil: agriculture in the antebellum North. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Atack J, Margo RA (2011) The impact of access to rail transportation on agricultural improvement: the American Midwest as a test case. J Transp Land Use 4:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atack J, Bateman F, Weiss T (2006) National samples from the census of manufacturing: 1850, 1860, and 1870. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Atack J, Bateman F, Haines M, Margo RA (2010) Did railroads induce or follow economic growth? Urbanization and population growth in the American Midwest, 1850–1860. Soc Sci Hist 34:171–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Atack J, Jaremski M, Rousseau PL (2014) American banking and the transportation revolution before the Civil War. J Econ Hist 74:943–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogart D, Majewski J (2008) Two roads to the transportation revolution: early corporations in the United Kingdom and the United States. In: Costa D, Lamoreaux NR (eds) Understanding long-run economic growth: geography, institutions and the knowledge economy. National Bureau of Economic Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter SB, Gartner SS, Haines MR, Olmstead AL, Sutch R, Wright G (eds) (2006) Historical statistics of the United States, earliest times to the present: millennial edition. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman A (2012) The effect of transport infrastructure on home production activity: evidence from rural New York, 1825–1845. Motu working paper 12-01. Motu Economic and Policy Research, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig LA, Palmquist RB, Weiss T (1998) Transportation improvements and land values in the antebellum United States: a hedonic approach. J Real Estate Financ Econ 16:173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranmer HJ (1960) Canal investment, 1815–1860. In: Parker WN (ed) Trends in the American economy in the nineteenth century. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • David PA (1966) The mechanization of reaping in the ante-bellum Midwest. In: Rosovsky H (ed) Industrialization in two systems: essays in honor of Alexander Gerschenkron. John Wiley and Dons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • David PA (1967) The growth of real product in the United States before 1840: new evidence, controlled conjectures. J Econ Hist 27:151–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David PA (1996) Real income and economic welfare growth in the early republic or, another try at getting the American story straight. Discussion papers in economic and social history, vol 5. University of Oxford, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JH (2004) An annual index of U.S. industrial production, 1790–1915. Q J Econ 119:1177–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JH, Irwin DA (2003) Trade disruptions and America’s early industrialization. NBER working paper no. 9944. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA (1961) Regional income trends, 1840–1950. In: Harris SE (ed) American economic history. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Field AJ (1983) Land abundance, interest/profit rates, and nineteenth-century American and British technology. J Econ Hist 43:405–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishlow A (1965) American railroads and the transformation of the antebellum economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisig H (1976) Slavery, the supply of agricultural labor, and the industrialization of the South. J Econ Hist 36:572–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel RW (1964) Railroads and American economic growth: essays in econometric history. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre N, Wagman B (1993) Counting housework: new estimates of real product in the United States, 1800–1860. J Econ Hist 53:275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallman RE (1960) Commodity output, 1839–1899. In: Parker WN (ed) Trends in the American economy in the nineteenth century. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallman RE (1966) Gross national product in the United States, 1834–1909. In: Conference on Research in Income and Wealth (ed) Output, employment, and productivity in the United States after 1800. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallman RE (1970) Self-sufficiency of the cotton economy of the antebellum South. In: Parker WN (ed) The structure of the cotton economy of the antebellum South. The Agricultural History Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin CD, Lewis FD (1980) The role of exports in American economic growth during the Napoleonic Wars, 1793–1807. Explor Econ Hist 17:6–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin CD, Sokoloff K (1982) Women, children, and industrialization in the early republic. J Econ Hist 42:741–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich C (ed) (1961) Canals and American economic development. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Habakkuk HJ (1962) American and British technology in the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Haites AF, Mak J, Walton GM (1975) Western river transportation: the era of early internal development, 1810–1860. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst LA (1978) Interregional commodity trade from the North to the South and American economic development in the antebellum period. Arno Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin J (1988) Exploring the affinity of wheat and slavery in the Virginia Piedmont. Explor Econ Hist 25:295–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AH (1980) Wealth of a nation to be: the American colonies on the eve of the revolution. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan BZ (2005) The democratization of invention: patents and copyrights in American economic development, 1790–1920. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DB (1990) The voluntary provision of public goods? The turnpike companies of early America. Econ Inq 28:788–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebergott S (1964) Manpower in economic growth: the American record since 1800. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert PH, Williamson JG (2016) Unequal gains: American growth and inequality since 1700. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom DL (1970) Southern dependence upon interregional grain supplies: a review of the trade flows, 1840–1860. In: Parker WN (ed) The structure of the cotton economy of the antebellum South. The Agricultural History Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom DL (1978) Economic development in the Philadelphia region, 1810–1850. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer D (2005) Networked machinists: high-technology industries in antebellum America. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser P (2005) How Do Patent Laws Influence Invention? Evidence from nineteenth-century world’s fairs. Am Econ Rev 95:1214–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1966) The economic growth of the United States, 1790–1860. W.W. Norton, New York. First published 1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead AL (1975) The mechanization of reaping and mowing in American agriculture, 1833–1870. J Econ Hist 35:327–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead AL, Rhode PW (1995) Beyond the threshold: an analysis of the characteristics and behavior of early reaper adopters. J Econ Hist 55:27–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead AL, Rhode PW (2008a) Creating abundance: biological innovation and American agricultural development. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead AL, Rhode PW (2008b) Biological innovation and productivity growth in the antebellum cotton economy. J Econ Hist 68:1123–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead AL, Rhode PW (2018) Cotton, slavery and the new history of capitalism. Explor Econ Hist 67:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker WN (ed) (1970) The structure of the cotton economy in the antebellum South. The Agricultural History Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker WN, Gallman RE (1992) Southern farms study, 1860. Inter-University Consortium for Social and Political Research, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker WN, Klein JLV (1966) Productivity growth in grain production in the United States, 1840–60 and 1900–10. In: Output, employment and productivity in the United States after 1800. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paskoff PF (2007) Troubled waters: steamboat disasters, river improvements, and American public policy, 1821–1860. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N (1963) Technological change in the machine tool industry, 1840–1910. J Econ Hist 23:414–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N (1976) Perspectives on technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom JL (2004) Path dependence and the origins of cotton textile manufacturing in New England. In: Farnie DA, Jeremy DJ (eds) The fibre that changed the world: the cotton industry in international perspective, 1600–1990s. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal H (1961) Cycles of canal construction. In: Goodrich C (ed) Canals and American economic development. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff KL (1986) Productivity growth in manufacturing during early industrialization: evidence from the American Northeast, 1820–1860. In: Engerman SL, Gallman RE (eds) Long-term factors in American economic growth. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff K, Zorina Khan B (1990) The democratization of invention during early industrialization: evidence for the United States, 1790–1846. J Econ Hist 50:363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylla R (1998) U.S. securities markets and the banking system, 1790–1840. Fed Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev 80:83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Temin P (1988) Product quality and vertical integration in the early textile industry. J Econ Hist 48:891–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson R (2009) Structures of change in the mechanical age: technological innovation in the United States, 1790–1865. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Towne MW, Rasmussen WD (1960) Farm gross product and gross investment in the nineteenth century. In: Parker WN (ed) Trends in the American economy in the nineteenth century. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis JJ (2003) The property tax as a coordinating device: financing Indiana’s mammoth internal improvement system, 1835–1842. Explor Econ Hist 40:223–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis JJ, Weingast BR (2018) Equilibrium federal impotence: why the states and not the American national government financed economic development in the antebellum, era. J Public Financ Public Choice 33:19–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss T (1992) U.S. labor force estimates and economic growth, 1800–1860. In: Gallman RE, Wallis JJ (eds) American economic growth and standards of living before the Civil War. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss T (1993) Economic growth before 1860: revised conjectures. In: Weiss T, Schaefer D (eds) American economic development in historical perspective. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright G (2006) Slavery and American economic development. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin Wright .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wright, G. (2018). The Antebellum US Economy. In: Diebolt, C., Haupert, M. (eds) Handbook of Cliometrics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_65-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_65-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40458-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40458-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics