Abstract
The continuous expansion and growth of urban and settled areas result in a mosaic of open spaces which provide important habitat for species. Species richness within the urban matrix has been commonly studied in relation to urban-rural gradients, where the richness in open-space patches has been evaluated with respect to their location along this gradient. In this study we propose that additional factors may drive richness properties, namely patch size. We established a comparative study, where species richness patterns were compared between Haifa and Hannover, with respect to two driving factors: open-area patch size and its distance from the urban edge. These relationships were assessed for the overall number of vascular plant species and for native species only. Patches were identified by classifying aerial photographs of the cities, and surveying 32 patches in Hannover and 37 patches in Haifa which were randomly selected from the delineated patches. Results indicate that in both cities distance from the urban edge was not a significant factor explaining either the total vascular plant richness in the patches, or the native species richness. In contrast, both classes of species richness were significantly related with patch size. R2 values for total richness were 53 % in Hannover and 45 % in Haifa. With respect to native species richness, patch size explained a higher proportion of the variance in Hannover where R2 = 73 %, and a lower proportion of the variance in Haifa (R2 = 33 %). These preliminary results indicate strikingly similar driving factors in two urban landscapes which are characterized by fundamentally different histories and environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Batty, M. (2008). The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science, 319, 769–771.
Benguigui, L., & Czamanski, D. (2004). Simulation analysis of the fractality of cities. Geographical Analysis, 36, 69–84.
Blair, R. B. (1996). Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications, 6(2), 506–519.
Bolger, D. T., Scott, T. A., & Rotenberry, J. T. (1997). Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California. Conservation Biology, 11(2), 406–421.
Buttler, K., & Hand, R. (2008). Liste der Gefäßpflanzen Deutschlands. Kochia (p. 107). Berlin: Gesellschaft zur Erforschung der Flora Deutschlands.
Drayton, B., & Primack, R. B. (1996). Plant species lost in an isolated conservation area in Metropolitan Boston from 1894 to 1993. Conservation Biology, 10(1), 30–39.
DWD. (2013a). Mittelwerte 30-jähriger Perioden. Mittelwerte für den Bezugsstandort am Ende der Referenzperiode 1981–2010. Niederschlag. http://www.dwd.de. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.
DWD. (2013b). Mittelwerte 30-jähriger Perioden. Mittelwerte für den Bezugsstandort am Ende der Referenzperiode 1981–2010. Temperatur. http://www.dwd.de. Accessed 22 Mar 2013.
Feinbrun-Dothan, N., & Danin, A. (1991). Analytical flora of Eretz-Israel. Jerusalem: Cana Publishing House.
Garve, E. (2004). Rote Liste und Florenliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen in Niedersachsen und Bremen. (Informationsdienst Naturschutz Niedersachsachsen 24 (1/04)). Hildesheim, Germany: Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Ökologie.
Guntenspergen, G., & Levenson, J. (1997). Understory plant species composition in remnant stands along an urban-to-rural land-use gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 1(3), 155–169.
Hope, D., Gries, C., Zhu, W., Fagan, W. F., Redman, C. L., Grimm, N. B., Nelson, A. L., Martin, C., & Kinzig, A. (2003). Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 100(15), 8788–8792.
Huste, A., & Boulinier, T. (2007). Determinants of local extinction and turnover rates in urban bird communities. Ecological Applications, 17(1), 168–180.
IMS. (2011). Climatic Atlas of Israel for physical and environmental planning and design. Israel Meteorological Service. (In Hebrew). http://www.ims.gov.il/IMS/CLIMATE/ClimaticAtlas. Accessed 7 Mar 2013.
Knapp, S., Kühn, I., Mosbrugger, V., & Klotz, S. (2008). Do protected areas in urban and rural landscapes differ in species diversity? Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(7), 1595–1612.
Kühn, I., Brandl, R., & Klotz, S. (2004). The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6, 749–764.
Levin, S. A., Muller-Landau, H. C., Nathan, R., & Chave, J. (2003). The ecology and evolution of seed dispersal: A theoretical perspective. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 575–604.
LGN. (2007). ATKIS (Amtlich Topographisch-Kartographisches Informationssystem) Basis DLM (Digitales Landschaftsmodell) im Maßstab 1:10.000 bis 1:25.000.
MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The theory of island biogeography (Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McKinney, M. L. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 161–176.
Meffert, P., & Dziock, F. (2012). What determines occurrence of threatened bird species on urban wastelands? Biological Conservation, 153, 87–96.
Melles, S., Glenn, S., & Martin, K. (2003). Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: Species environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conservation Ecology, 7(1), 22.
Mörtberg, U. M. (2001). Resident bird species in urban forest remnants; landscape and habitat perspectives. Landscape Ecology, 16, 193–203.
Niemelä, J. (1999). Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 119–131.
Preston, F. W. (1962). The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: Part I. Ecology, 43, 185–215.
Ramalho, C. E., & Hobbs, R. J. (2012). Time for a change: Dynamic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 179–188.
Ricklefs, R. E., & Miller, G. L. (2000). Ecology (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Snep, R. P. H., Opdam, P. F. M., Baveco, J. M., WallisDeVries, M. F., Timmermans, W., Kwak, R. G. M., & Kuypers, V. (2006). How peri-urban areas can strengthen animal populations within cities: A modeling approach. Biological Conservation, 127(3), 345–355.
Sukopp, H., Numata, M., & Huber, A. (1995). Urban ecology as the basis of urban planning. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing.
Underwood, A. J. (1997). Experiments in ecology: Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wania, A., Kühn, I., & Klotz, S. (2006). Plant richness patterns in agricultural and urban landscapes in Central Germany—spatial gradients of species richness. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(1), 97–110.
Wickham, J., O’Neill, R., & Jones, K. (2000). Forest fragmentation as an economic indicator. Landscape Ecology, 15, 171–179.
Zander, R., & Erhardt, W. (2008). Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen. Dictionary of plant names = Dictionnaire des noms de plants (18th ed.). Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer.
Acknowledgements
The presented investigations are part of the research project “Cities, nature and life between them: the dynamics of human and natural ecosystems and the interrelationships between them”, which is conducted by the Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany and the Technion – Institute of Technology –, Haifa and the University of Haifa, Israel. This joint research project was financially supported by the State of Lower Saxony, Hannover, Germany to SR, RP and DM, and was partially financed by research grant 666/10 from the Israeli Science Foundation to DM. Besides the presented investigations of species richness of vascular plants, the research project focuses on birds as well as mammals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matthies, S. et al. (2013). Vascular Plant Species Richness Patterns in Urban Environments: Case Studies from Hannover, Germany and Haifa, Israel. In: Malkinson, D., Czamanski, D., Benenson, I. (eds) Modeling of Land-Use and Ecological Dynamics. Cities and Nature. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40199-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40199-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40198-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40199-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)