Skip to main content

Choice of Directions for the Approximation of Reachable Sets for Hybrid Systems

  • Conference paper
Computer Aided Systems Theory – EUROCAST 2011 (EUROCAST 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6927))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we propose an approach to over-approximate the reachable set (with bounded time and number of transitions) of a hybrid system by a finite set of polytopes. The constraints of the polytope are determined by a direction choice method. For the hybrid systems whose (1) continuous dynamics are linear, (2) invariants and guards are defined by linear inequalities, and (3) variable resets are expressed by invertible affine maps, we show that the over-approximations can be computed in polynomial time, and the overestimation can be arbitrarily reduced by decreasing the discretization time step if the continuous dynamics are all deterministic. Some experimental results are also presented to show the effectiveness of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Henzinger, T.A., Kopke, P.W., Puri, A., Varaiya, P.: What’s decidable about hybrid automata? In: Proc. of STOC 1995, pp. 373–382. ACM, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bournez, O., Maler, O., Pnueli, A.: Orthogonal polyhedra: Representation and computation. In: Vaandrager, F.W., van Schuppen, J.H. (eds.) HSCC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1569, pp. 46–60. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chutinan, A., Krogh, B.H.: Computing polyhedral approximations to flow pipes for dynamic systems. In: Proc. of CDC 1998. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kurzhanski, A.B., Varaiya, P.: On ellipsoidal techniques for reachability analysis. Optimization Methods and Software 17, 177–237 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Girard, A.: Reachability of uncertain linear systems using zonotopes. In: Morari, M., Thiele, L. (eds.) HSCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3414, pp. 291–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Le Guernic, C., Girard, A.: Reachability analysis of hybrid systems using support functions. In: Bouajjani, A., Maler, O. (eds.) CAV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5643, pp. 540–554. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Alur, R., Courcoubetis, C., Halbwachs, N., Henzinger, T.A., Ho, P., Nicollin, X., Olivero, A., Sifakis, J., Yovine, S.: The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems. Theoretical Computer Science 138(1), 3–34 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Le Guernic, C., Girard, A.: Reachability analysis of linear systems using support functions. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems 4(2), 250–262 (2010); IFAC World Congress 2008

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart, G., Sun, J.: Matrix Perturbation Theory. Academic Press, London (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Asarin, E., Dang, T., Maler, O., Testylier, R.: Using redundant constraints for refinement. In: Bouajjani, A., Chin, W.-N. (eds.) ATVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6252, pp. 37–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Fehnker, A., Ivančić, F.: Benchmarks for hybrid systems verification. In: Alur, R., Pappas, G.J. (eds.) HSCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2993, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Guernic, C.: Reachability Analysis of Hybrid Systems with Linear Continuous Dynamics. Ph.d. thesis, Université Joseph Fourier (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stursberg, O., Krogh, B.H.: Efficient representation and computation of reachable sets for hybrid systems. In: Maler, O., Pnueli, A. (eds.) HSCC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2623, pp. 482–497. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, X., Ábrahám, E. (2012). Choice of Directions for the Approximation of Reachable Sets for Hybrid Systems. In: Moreno-Díaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada-Arencibia, A. (eds) Computer Aided Systems Theory – EUROCAST 2011. EUROCAST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6927. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27549-4_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27549-4_69

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27548-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27549-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics