Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Grip Strength Evolution After Carpal Tunnel Release by Three Different Techniques

  • Chapter
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

  • 3660 Accesses

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)secondary to compression of the median nerve in the palm is the most frequent nerve entrapment of the upper extremity. Some forms are accessible to medical treatment,others need surgical treatment.The simple section of the transverse carpal ligament has been successfully used with predictable relief of distal paresthesia.However,diminished grip strength and / or palmar soreness are frequently an issue,resulting in a delayed return to work and recreational activities.The recent introduction of endoscopic release of CTS bolstered by commercial benefits has led us to set up a randomized prospective study to compare evolution of grip strength after three methods of carpal tunnel release (CTR)performed by the same surgeon: simple open section of the ligament, open section with ligament reconstruction,and endoscopic release (Agee procedure).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agee J, Tortosa R, Berry D, Peimer C (1990) Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: a randomized prospective multicenter study. 45th Annual Meeting of American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arner M, Hagberg L, Rosen B (1994) Sensory disturbances after two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a preliminary report. J Hand Surg. Am. 19, 548–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buch-Jaeger N, Foucher G (1994) Correlation of clinical signs with nerve conduction tests in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery 19B, 720–724

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buch-Jaeger N, Stutzmann-Simon S, Jesel M, Foucher G (1998) Efficacité clinique à moyen et long terme du traitement chirurgical du syndrome du canal carpien. La Main 3, 195–201

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bury TF, Akelman E, Weiss AP (1995) Prospective, randomized trial of splinting after carpal tunnel release. Ann Plast Surg 35, 19–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaise F, Roger B, Laval-Jeantet M, Alhomme Ph (1986) Exploration tomodensitométrique des modifications anatomiques du poignet entraînées par la section du ligament annulaire antérieur. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique 72, 297–302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chow J (1990) Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: a new technique for carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthroscopy 6, 289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook AC, Szabo RM, Birkholz SW, King EF (1995) Early mobilization following carpal tunnel release. A prospective randomized study. J Hand Surg Br 20, 228–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Das SK, Brown HG (1976) In search of complications in carpal tunnel decompression. The hand 8, 243–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dellon AL (1992) Patient evaluation and management considerations in nerve compression. Hands Clinics 8, 229–239.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Duncan KH, Lewis RC, Foreman KA, Nordyke MD (1987) Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand: Results of a questionnaire. J Hand Surg 12A, 384–391

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foucher G, Malizos C, Sammut D et al. (1991) Primary palmaris longus transfer as an opponensplasty in carpal tunnel release. A series of 73 cases. J Hand Surg Br 16, 56–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Foucher G (1994) Chirurgie des syndromes canalaires du poignet. Encyclopédie médico-chirurgicale (Paris-France), Techniques chirurgicales, Orthopédie Traumatologie 44-362

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foucher G, Braga Da Silva J (1995) Ouverture endoscopique du canal carpien. Chirurgie 120, 100–104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Foucher G, Allieu Y, Buch N (1995) Bilan d’une expérience de libération endoscopique du canal carpien par la technique d’ Agee. À propos de 280 cas. Rhumatologie 47,2, 47–51

    Google Scholar 

  16. Foucher G, Van Overstraeten L, Braga Da Silva J, Nolens N (1996) Changes in grip strength in a randomized study of carpal tunnel release by three different techniques. Eur. J Orthop Surg Traumatol 6, 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fuss FK, Wagner TF (1996) Biomechanical alterations in the carpal arch and hand muscles after carpal tunnel release: a further approach toward understanding the function of the flexor retinaculum and the cause of postoperative grip weakness. Clin Anat 9, 100–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garstman GM, Kouach JC, Crouch CC et al. (1986) Carpal arcle alterations after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 11A, 372–374

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gellmann H, Kan D, Gee V et al. (1989) Analysis of pinch and grip strength after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 14A, 863–864

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gibbs KE, Rand W, Ruby LK (1996) Open vs endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Orthopedics 19, 1025–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jakab E, Ganos D, Cook FW (1991) Transverse carpal ligament reconstruction in surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome: a new technique. J Hand Surg 16A, 202–206

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jarit P (1991) Dominant-hand to non-dominant hand grip strength ratios of college baseball players. Journal of Hand Therapy 123–126

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jessurun W, Hillen B, Zonneveld F et al. (1987) Anatomical relation in the carpal tunnel: a computed tomographic study. J Hand Surg 12B, 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jimenez DF, Gibbs SR, Clapper AT (1998) Endoscopic treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review. J Neurosurg 88: 817–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kapandji AJ (1990) La plastie d’agrandissement du ligament annulaire antérieur du carpe dans le traitement du syndrome du canal carpien. Ann Chir Main 9, 305–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kiritsis PG, Kline SC (1995) Biomechanical changes after carpal tunnel release: a cadaveric model for comparing open, endoscopic, and step-cut lengthening techniques. J Hand Surg Am 20, 173–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Langloh ND, Linscheid RL (1972) Recurrent and unrelieved carpal tunnel syndrome. Clinical Orthopaedics 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mirza MA, King ET Jr, Tanveer S (1995) Palmar uniportal extrabursal endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Arthroscopy 11, 82–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakao E, Short WH, Werner FW et al. (1998) Changes in carpal tunnel pressures following endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 23, 43–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Netscher D, Mosharrafa A, Lee M et al. (1997) Transverse carpal ligament: its effect on flexor tendon excursion, morphologic changes of the carpal canal, and on pinch and grip strengths after open carpal tunnel release. Plast Reconstr Surg 100, 636–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Palmer DH, Paulson JC, Lane Larsen CL et al. (1993) Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a comparison of two techniques with open release. Arthroscopy 9, 498–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Phalen GS (1966) The carpal tunnel syndrome. Seventeen years’ experience in diagnosis and treatment of six hundred fifty-four hands. J Bone Joint Surg 48A, 211–228

    Google Scholar 

  33. Richmann JA, Gelberman RH, Rydevik BL et al. (1989) Carpal tunnel syndrome: morphology changes after release of the transverse carpal ligament. J Hand Surg 14A, 852–857

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rothan MB, Manske PR, Mirly AL (1993) Anatomical study of an endoscopic carpal tunnel device to surrounding structures. J Hand Surg 18A, 442–450

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sennwald GR, Benedetti R (1995) The value of one-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc 3, 113–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Skorpik G, Landsiedl F (1996) Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom. Ein Vergleich der endoskopischen und offenen operativen Behandlung. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 28, 133–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Stutzmann S, Buch Jaeger N, Foucher G (1998) Syndrome du canal carpien. Résultats du traitement conservateur par orthèse de repos nocturne surmesure. La Main 3, 203–210

    Google Scholar 

  38. Viegas SF, Pollard A, Kaminksi K (1992) Carpal arch alteration and related clinical status after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 17, 1012–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 4, Boulevard de President-Edwards (Bd. de l’Orangerie), 67000, Strasbourg, France

    G. Foucher M.D.

  2. Policlinico Multimedica, Chirurgia della Mano, Università di Milano, Via Milanese 300, S. S. Giovanni, Milano, Italy

    G. Pajardi (Professor)

Authors
  1. G. Foucher M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Pajardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Van Overstraeten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Braga Da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Via Pietro da Rimini 4, 47900, Rimini, Italy

    Riccardo Luchetti M.D.

  2. Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA

    Peter Amadio M.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Foucher, G., Pajardi, G., Van Overstraeten, L., Braga Da Silva, J. (2007). Comparison of Grip Strength Evolution After Carpal Tunnel Release by Three Different Techniques. In: Luchetti, R., Amadio, P. (eds) Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49008-1_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49008-1_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22387-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49008-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation