Skip to main content

Philosophers in Prison: Students in the Indiana Women’s Prison College Program Reflect on Philosophical Theories of Punishment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ethics of Policing and Imprisonment

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy ((PASEPP))

  • 1710 Accesses

Abstract

Since philosophy is a communal enterprise, it is a particular privilege to hold a philosophical conversation with people whose voices are too often excluded, like my students at the Indiana Women’s Prison. These women taught me that Aristotelian virtue ethics might give us some insight into abusive relationships, and Plato’s tripartite soul can express the intensity of drug addiction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Mitchell. “Punishment and Justification.” Ethics, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 258–290, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erisman, Wendy, and Jeanne Bayer Contardo. Learning to Reduce Recidivism: A 50-State Analysis of Postsecondary Correction Education Policy. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy, 2005. Web. 19 Dec 2015. at ix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, Stephen P. “Lifting the Veil on Punishment.” 2004. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/276.

  • Husak, Douglas. “Why Punish the Deserving?” Nous, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 447–464, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. The Philosophy of Law: An Exposition of the Fundamental Principles of Jurisprudence as the Science of Right. Trans. W. Hastie, B.D. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Thomas. “Cuomo Drops Plant to Use State Money to Pay for College Classes for Inmates.” New York Times, April 2, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. The Works of John Locke in Nine Volumes. London: Rivington, 1824. Online. pg 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. In Ian Shapiro (ed.), Two Treatises of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, Stephen J. “Establishing Successful Postsecondary Academic Programs; A Practical Guide.” The Journal of Correctional Education, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 6–26, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Michael S. “The Moral Worth of Retribution.” In Ferdinand Schoeman (ed.), Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Herbert. “Persons and Punishment.” The Monist, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 475–501, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Jeffrie G. “Marxism and Retribution.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 2, pp. 217–243, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO). Examining Fiscal 2013–2015 State Spending. Washington, DC: Author, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert. Philosophical Explanations, pp. 366–374. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Phillip. “Republican Theory and Criminal Punishment.” Utilitas, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 59–79, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Center on the States. One in 100: Behind Bars in America 2008. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2008. Web. 21 Dec 2015. at 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosebury, Brian. “The Theory of Offender’s Forfeited Right.” Criminal Justice Ethics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 259–283, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J.J., and Bernard Williams. Utilitarianism: For & Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Haag, Ernest. “The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense of Capital Punishment.” The Harvard Law Review, vol. 99, pp. 1662–1669. Harvard: Harvard Law Review Association, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Nigel. Why Punish? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, Christopher Heath. Rights Forfeiture and Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kazanjian, M. (2018). Philosophers in Prison: Students in the Indiana Women’s Prison College Program Reflect on Philosophical Theories of Punishment. In: Gardner, M., Weber, M. (eds) The Ethics of Policing and Imprisonment. Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97770-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics