Skip to main content

Criminal Process as Mutual Accountability: Mass Incarceration, Carcerality, and Abolition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ethics of Policing and Imprisonment

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy ((PASEPP))

Abstract

Elsewhere, Stephen Darwall has argued for a mutual accountability framework of law and gestured toward a mutual accountability framework of punishment. Little was said, however, regarding what the latter conception of punishment would require, structurally and functionally. Here Stephen and William Darwall address these matters in the specific context of contemporary American policing and penal institutions. From historical and empirical work on the American carceral regime, they argue, first, that its institutions fail to meet accountability conditions necessary for their legitimacy. Second, they argue that these institutions are responsible for producing social dynamics that undermine the possibility of mutual accountability in general. They conclude that American carceral institutions lack the authority they purport to have to make and enforce the criminal law, and thus that any effort, theoretical or practical, to realize justice in the domain of criminal process, requires an abolitionist framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alexander, Michelle. (2010). Mass Incarceration in the Age of Color-Blindness. New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Elizabeth. (2016). “The Social Epistemology of Morality: Learning from the Forgotten History of the Abolition of Slavery,” in Miranda Fricker and Michael Brady, eds., The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in Collective Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Dan, Mariame Kaba, and David Stein. (2017). “What Abolitionists Do.” Jacobin Magazine. https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/08/prison-abolition-reform-mass-incarceration.

  • Bobo, Lawrence D, and Victor Thompson. (2010). “Racializing Mass Incarceration: Poverty, Prejudice, and Punishment,” in Hazel Markus and Paul Moya, eds., Doing Race: 21 Essays for the 21st Century. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, Fox. (2002). “Study Finds Big Increase in Black Men as Inmates Since 1980,” The New York Times, August 28, 2002. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/28/us/study-finds-big-increase-in-black-men-as-inmates-since-1980.html.

  • Carson, E. Ann. (2015). “Prisoners in 2014,” Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p14.pdf.

  • Clark, Kenneth B. (1967). Dark Ghetto: Dilemmas of Social Power, 2nd ed., William Julius Wilson, ed. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clear, Todd R., and Natasha A. Frost. (2013). The Punishment Imperative. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Jules L., and Jody Kraus. (1986). “Rethinking the Theory of Legal Rights,” Yale Law Journal 95: 1335–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen. (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen. (2007). “Law and the Second-Person Standpoint,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 40: 891–910. Reprinted in Darwall 2013a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen. (2010). “Justice and Retaliation,” Philosophical Papers 39: 315–341. Reprinted in Darwall 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen. (2012). “Bipolar Obligation,” in Russ Shafer-Landau, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Darwall 2013.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen. (2013). Morality, Authority, and Law: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen. (2016). “Making the Hard Problem of Moral Normativity Easier,” in Errol Lord and Barry Maguire, eds. Weighing Reasons, pp. 257–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen, and Julian Darwall. (2012). “Civil Recourse as Mutual Accountability,” Florida State University Law Review 39: 17–41. Reprinted in Darwall 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Angela Y. Davis. (2003). Are Prisons Obsolete? New York, NY: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotson, Kristie. (2017, February). “Beyond the Now: Epistemic Oppression and Carceral Common Sense.” Conference presentation at Philosophy and Mass Incarceration, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, Frederick. (1999). Frederick Douglass: Selected Speeches and Writings, ed. Philip S. Foner. Chicago, IL: Lawrence Hill Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, W. E. B. (2014). Black Reconstruction in America, ed. Henry Louis Gates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel. (1970). “The Expressive Theory of Punishment,” in Doing and Deserving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, James Jr. (2017). Locking Up Our Own. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, Ruth Wilson. (2007). Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, Jean. (1998). “The Retributive Idea,” in Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jean Hampton. Forgiveness and Mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslanger, Sally. (2017). Critical Theory and Practice (The 2015 Spinoza Lectures (booklet)). Amsterdam: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, Elizabeth. (2016a). From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, Elizabeth. (2016b). “From ‘War on Crime’ to War on the Black Community: the Enduring Impact of President Johnson’s Crime Commission,” Boston Review, June 21, 2016. http://bostonreview.net/us/elizabeth-hinton-kerner-commission-crime-commission.

  • Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. (1923). Fundamental Legal Conceptions, ed. Walter Wheeler Cook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Ann. (1988). “Mens Rea and the Right to Trial by Jury,” California Law Review 76: 391–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Incite! Women, Gender Non-Conforming, and Trans people of Color*. (2014). “Community Accountability: How Do We Address Violence within Our Communities?” http://www.incite-national.org/page/community-accountability. Accessed 4.18.18.

  • Irwin, John. (2004). The Warehouse Prison: Disposal of the New Dangerous Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad, Khalil Gibran. (2010). The Condemnation of Blackness: Race, Crime, and the Making of Urban America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelby, Tommie. (2016). Dark Ghettos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Jonathan. (2007). Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. (1982). The Theory of Moral Sentiments, eds. D. D. Raphael and A. L. MacFie. Indianapolis: LibertyClassics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. (1968). “Freedom and Resentment,” in Studies in the Philosophy of Thought and Action. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadros, Victor. (2009). “Poverty and Criminal Responsibility,” Journal of Value Inquiry 43: 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Keeanga Yamahtta. (2016). From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Michael. (2004). “What Is It To Wrong Someone?: A :Puzzle About Justice,” in Reason and Value: Themes from the Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds., R. Jay Wallace, Philip Pettit, Samuel Scheffler, and Michael Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitale, Alex. (2017). The End of Policing. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, Loïc. (2002). “From Slavery to Mass Incarceration: Rethinking the ‘Race Question’ in the United States,” New Left Review 13: 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, Loïc. (2010). “Class, Race, and Hyperincarceration in Revanchist America,” Daedelus 139: 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Jackie. (2018). Carceral Capitalism. South Pasadena, CA: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Gary. (2015). “A Moral Predicament in the Criminal Law,” Inquiry 58: 168–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaffe, Gideon. (2011). “Prevention and Imminence: Pre-punishment and Actuality,” San Diego Law Review 48: 1205–1228.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Darwall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Darwall, S., Darwall, W. (2018). Criminal Process as Mutual Accountability: Mass Incarceration, Carcerality, and Abolition. In: Gardner, M., Weber, M. (eds) The Ethics of Policing and Imprisonment. Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97770-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics