Abstract
Due to the fact that NF1 is one of the more frequent genetic diseases (1/2500–1/3000, see Chap. 1), in the last 20 years dedicated centers for diagnosis and follow-up of these patients have been established allowing clinicians to acquire noteworthy clinical experience. Moreover, diagnostic laboratories are now able to provide molecular analyses with a detection rate that reaches 95% of patients affected by NF1. A critical revision of the classical grid of diagnostic criteria is now mandatory in order to actualize and mix the “classical” diagnostic criteria and recent knowledge. We remind that some of the proposed new clinical signs did not reach a unanimous consensus for different reasons among the experts to be introduced as new criteria, such as anemic nevus, UBOs, elevated head circumference and neuropsychological pattern.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, Gonsalves C, Ufholz LA, Mascioli K, Wang C, Foth T. The use of the Delphi and other consensus group methods in medical education research: a review. Acad Med. 2017;92(10):1491–8.
Funding Sources
None.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tadini, G., Brems, H., Legius, E. (2020). Proposal of New Diagnostic Criteria. In: Tadini, G., Legius, E., Brems, H. (eds) Multidisciplinary Approach to Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92450-2_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92450-2_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92449-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92450-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)