Skip to main content

Diplomacy and Paradiplomacy in the North Atlantic and the Arctic—A Comparative Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The GlobalArctic Handbook

Abstract

Paradiplomacy is the concept that sub-regional governments use to handle international relations. In recent decades, sub-regional jurisdictions have been given more self-rule according to the right of self-determination and various voices from different actors have become increasingly crucial in the international debate (Bartmann in Round Table: Commonwealth J Int Aff 95:541–559, 2006; Lecours in Political Issues of Paradiplomacy: Lessons from the Developed World. Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael”, 2008). The present chapter sheds light on the recent developments in the North Atlantic and the Arctic regarding paradiplomatic relations, with a focus on the sub-regional jurisdictions of the Faroe Islands, Greenland, Nunavut, and Svalbard. Although these regions differ in terms of how they are regulated by national and international jurisdictions, all of these cases apart from Svalbard are also heading towards even more self-government in relation to their respective metropolitan state. Svalbard can be seen as a reverse case, where a kind of ‘reverse paradiplomacy’, or rather normal diplomacy, is at hand. I will elaborate on this subject in a separate section about this region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abele F, Rodon T (2007) Inuit diplomacy in the global ERA: the strengths of multilateral internationalism. Can Foreign Policy J 13:45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackrén M (2006) The Faroe Islands’ option for independence. Island Stud J 1:221–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackrén M (2014a) Paradiplomacy in Greenland. In: Grydehøj A et al (eds) Paradiplomacy. Centre Maurits Coppieters, Brussels, pp 64–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackrén M (2014b) Greenlandic Paradiplomatic relations. In: Heininen L (ed) Security and sovereignty in the North Atlantic. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 42–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackrén M, Jakobsen U (2015) Greenland as a self-governing sub-national territory in international relations: past, current and future perspectives. Polar Record 51:404–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler-Nissen R (2014) The Faroe Islands: independence dreams, globalist separatism and the Europeanization of postcolonial home rule. Cooperation and Conflict 49:55–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A (2009) The strange case of Svalbard. In: Anderson A (ed) After the ice: life, death and politics in the new Arctic. Virgin Books, USA, pp 122–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Åtland K, Pedersen T (2008) The Svalbard Archipelago in Russian security policy: overcoming the legacy of fear—or reproducing it? Eur Secur 17:227–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartmann B (2006) In or out: sub-national island jurisdictions and the antechamber of para-diplomacy. Round Table: Commonwealth Jo Int Aff 95:541–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsen R (2014) Devolution and withdrawal: Denmark and the North Atlantic, 1800–2100. In: Heininen L (ed) Security and sovereignty in the North Atlantic. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 9–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Criekemans D (2008) Are the boundaries between paradiplomacy and diplomacy watering down? Preliminary findings and hypotheses from a comparative study of some regions with legislative power and small states. In: Paper presented at the 2nd global international studies conference: what keeps us apart, what keeps us together? International order, justice, value. Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson F (2014) The Internationalisation of regions: paradiplomacy or multi-level governance? Geogr Compass 8:689–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evalik C, Charlie L (2010) Canadian sovereignty, the military and infrastructure development in the Inuit homeland. Submission to the senate standing committee on national security and defence, December 2010. Kitikmeot Inuit Association, Nunavut

    Google Scholar 

  • Gad UP (2013) Greenland projecting sovereignty—Denmark protecting sovereignty away. In: Adler-Nissen R, Gad UP (eds) European integration and postcolonial sovereignty games, pp 217–234. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring J (2007) Case study research—principles and practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grydehøj A, Grydehøj A, Ackrén M (2012) The Globalization of the Arctic: negotiating sovereignty and building communities in Svalbard, Norway. Island Stud J 7:99–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftendorn H (2012) The case for Arctic governance: the Arctic puzzle. Institute of International Affairs—Centre for Arctic Policy Studies, University of Iceland, Reykjavik

    Google Scholar 

  • Heininen L (2014) Northern geopolitics: actors, interests and processes in the circumpolar Arctic. In: Powell RC, Dodds K (eds) Polar geopolitics? Knowledge, resources and legal regimes. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA, pp 241–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough P (2013) International politics of the Arctic: coming in from the cold. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jákupsstovu í B, Regin B (2012) The Faroe Islands’ security policy in a process of devolution. Stjórnmál & Stjórnsýsla 2:413–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Jull P (2001) Negotiating nationhood, renegotiating nationhood: Canada’s Nunavut and Nunavut’s Canada. In: Paper presented at re-thinking indigenous self-determination: an international conference on the theory and practice of indigenous self-determination, 25–28 Sept 2001, School of Political Science & International Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecours A (2008) Political issues of paradiplomacy: lessons from the developed world. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael”

    Google Scholar 

  • Lov om Grønlands Selvstyre (2009) Lov nr. 473 af 12. juni 2009. Udgivet af Bureau for Inatsisartut

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouafo D (2004) Regional dynamics in Canada–United States Relations. In: Paper presented at the 2004 conference of the Canadian Political Science Association, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, 3 June 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Numminen L (2011) A history and functioning of the Spitsbergen treaty. In: Wallis D, Arnold S (eds) The Spitsbergen treaty—Multilateral governance in the Arctic, pp 7–20. Arctic papers, vol 1. Applied International Law Network

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquin S, Lachapelle G (2005) Why do sub-states and regions practice international relations? In: Lachapelle G, Paquin S (eds) Mastering globalization: new sub-states’ governance and strategies. Routledge, London and New York, pp 77–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen T (2008) The dynamics of Svalbard diplomacy. Diplomacy Statecraft 19:236–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt J (1992) Cases of cases…of cases. In: Ragin C, Becker HS (eds) What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 21–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (1992) Introduction: cases of ‘what is a case?’. In: Ragin CC, Becker HS (eds) What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry, pp 1–17. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (2000) Fuzzy-set social science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezvani DA (2014) Surpassing the Sovereign state: the wealth, self-rule, and security advantages of partially independent territories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shadian J (2010) From states to polities: reconceptualizing sovereignty through Inuit governance. Eur J Int Relat 16:485–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan S (2014) Making autonomies matter: sub-state actor accommodation in the Nordic council and the Nordic council of ministers. European Diversity and Autonomy Papers, EDAP 03/2014, EURAC Research. http://www.eurac.edu/edap

Web Pages

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Ackrén .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ackrén, M. (2019). Diplomacy and Paradiplomacy in the North Atlantic and the Arctic—A Comparative Approach. In: Finger, M., Heininen, L. (eds) The GlobalArctic Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91995-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics