Skip to main content

Contemporary Arctic Meets World Politics: Rethinking Arctic Exceptionalism in the Age of Uncertainty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The GlobalArctic Handbook

Abstract

During the last decade, the Arctic has generally become to be understood as an exceptional “zone of peace” and a “territory of dialogue”. The region has been seen as relatively encapsulated from global power politics, characterized primarily as an apolitical space of regional governance, functional co-operation, and peaceful co-existence. However, as the contemporary Arctic is increasingly global, it is potentially not that different from any other region in terms of being increasingly subject to various geoeconomic and politico-strategic dynamics. This has been recently highlighted by various spill-over effects of world politics into the region, such as the conflict in Ukraine or the US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement. The changed foreign policy behavior of Russia, and changes in US domestic and foreign policy, increase general uncertainty also in the Arctic. At the same time, exceptionalism has shown continuing resilience as Arctic actors have actively tried to maintain regional co-operation in a difficult international environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The United States is the only Arctic country that has not ratified the UNCLOS. However, it accepts the treaty as customary international law.

  2. 2.

    For an illustrative discussion, see, e.g., Rogin (2016).

  3. 3.

    Recent media analysis indicates a potential for more non-cooperative framing and usage of the region. Before the crisis in Ukraine, Arctic-related reporting in mainstream Russian newspapers highlighted the commercial development of the Arctic. After the crisis, newspaper coverage has started to emphasize a more statist and militarized rendering of the region. In particular, the keyword “military” has become popular: in an analysis of keywords, it has come up from the 89th position before the crisis up to the 4th position in post-crisis media coverage in mainstream newspapers (Pilli-Sihvola et al. 2016, 53–54).

  4. 4.

    For example, the US has reservations about Russia’s view of the NSR as internal waters as well as its willingness to control movement along the route through ice-breaker policy.

  5. 5.

    That said, currently, Russia proceeds legitimately through the UN process.

  6. 6.

    For more on Russian hybrid influence in the Nordic-Baltic region, see Pynnöniemi and Salonius-Pasternak (2016), Martikainen et al. (2016).

  7. 7.

    See, for example, Koivurova (2016). For a discussion of icebreakers and their limited relevance for the US military capability in the Arctic, see Kuersten (2016).

Bibliography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juha Käpylä .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Käpylä, J., Mikkola, H. (2019). Contemporary Arctic Meets World Politics: Rethinking Arctic Exceptionalism in the Age of Uncertainty. In: Finger, M., Heininen, L. (eds) The GlobalArctic Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91995-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics