Skip to main content

Alice Waters and the Edible Schoolyard: Rethinking School Lunch as Public Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Dimensions of School Lunch
  • 587 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I reframe Alice Waters’ Edible Schoolyard (ESY) Project at Martin Luther King, Jr. Middle School in Berkeley, California, as an innovative work not simply of commercial/school partnership, but of educational thought. Explicitly inspired by Waters’ work as a Montessori teacher and as a restaurant owner prominent in the international Slow Food Movement, ESY is constructing a new paradigm for school lunch in the present climate change era. This new paradigm renovates school lunch’s conceptual continuity with once-canonical thought about children’s schooling, in which deeply gendered foodways have been figured significantly. This theoretical inquiry on ESY concludes with a caution to those who would simply claim school gardening as a new best practice without also providing a social-ethical critique of current school lunch practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here Korsmeyer was invoking her concept of “deep gender,” which refers to familiar binary oppositions that constitute higher and lesser values, assigning higher value to those ideas and actions symbolically associated with “male” and lesser value to those symbolically associated with “female.”

  2. 2.

    http://edibleschoolyard.org/network

  3. 3.

    http://hearth.library.cornell.edu/h/hearth/browse/title/6060826.html

  4. 4.

    Elizabeth Palmer Peabody authored a documentary about Plumfield’s real-life precedent, Amos Bronson Alcott’s Temple School, at which she taught Louisa May Alcott and her sisters: Record of a school, exemplifying the general principles of spiritual culture (Boston: J. Munroe, 1835).

  5. 5.

    [5 min 4 sec YouTube intro: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qApx7O6phWo]

    [4 min 43 sec tour led by AW: http://www.epicurious.com/video/chef-profiles/chef-profiles-alice-waters/1915458812]

  6. 6.

    The Center for Ecoliteracy sponsored an evaluation of the Edible Schoolyard Project that it had funded, finding increases in students’ academic achievement, especially math and science; their gains in understanding garden cycles; their improved sense of place and understanding of sustainable agriculture; as well as significant gains in ecoliteracy scores and improvements in students’ choices of what to eat (http://api.ning.com/files/Hd3XFwJhO4NZ2yEroyYpmM9SWd-Hm36dOX6lIm4NE9Lp6P0HI-XhaRvAjvohXmHteHQ7Z-9GxVylLYDN2Y-bgedbWu0IIDyq/EvaluationoftheEdibleSchoolyard.pdf)

  7. 7.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gD2OHk7Y_KE

  8. 8.

    Yale Sustainable Food Project, http://www.yale.edu/sustainablefood/

  9. 9.

    Here I am deliberately invoking Jane Roland Martin’s reconfigured concept of education as “encounter,” in her Education Reconfigured (2011), a useful conceptual tool for qualitative and historical research on ESY’s educational contributions to the idea of the public school, now undergoing radical changes.

  10. 10.

    For an example of such school-leadership effort, see Patricia J. Simon, J. Taylor Tribble, William Frick, “Sustainability as a cultural meta-value for informing the ethics of school leadership: School gardening and its generative possibilities,” Journal of Authentic Leadership in Education 4, 1 (February 2015): 1–13.

References

  • Alcott, L. M. (2005). Louisa May Alcott: Little women, little men, Jo’s boys. New York: Library of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chez Panisse Foundation. (2008a). Lunch matters: How to feed our children better (The story of the Berkeley school lunch initiative). Berkeley, CA: Chez Panisse Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chez Panisse Foundation. (2008b). What you need to know about school lunch. Berkeley, CA: Chez Panisse Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. L. (2009). Nourishing the kids of Katrina: The Edible Schoolyard. San Francisco: Nourishing the Kids Media. http://www.nourishingthekids.com/

  • Hamilton, D. (2017). Alice Waters and her delicious revolution. American Masters Film. http://pbs.org/wnet.americanmasters/alice-waters-and-her-delicious-revolution/727/

  • Kamp, D. (2006). The United States of arugula: How we became a gourmet nation. New York: Clarkson Potter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsmeyer, C. (2002). Making sense of taste: Food and philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. (1988a). Women and gender in John Dewey’s philosophy of education. Educational Theory, 38(1), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. (1988b). Maternal teaching and maternal teachings: Philosophic and literary case studies of educating. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. (1989). The concept of teaching: Betsey Brown vs. Philosophy of Education? In J. M. Giarelli (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 1988 (pp. 32–45). Normal: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. (1994). Teaching in a different sense: Alcott’s Marmee. In A. Thompson (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 1993 (pp. 164–172). Normal: Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. (2003). Befriending girls as an educational life-practice. In F. Scott fletcher (Ed.), Featured essay in Philosophy of Education 2002 (pp. 73–81). Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society. http://ojs.ed.uiuc.edu/index.php/pes/issue/view/16

  • Laird, S. (2004). Gender and the construction of teaching. In K. R. Kesson & E. W. Ross (Eds.), Defending public schools: Teaching and teacher education. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. (2008a). Food for coeducational thought. In B. S. Stengel (Ed.), Presidential essay in Philosophy of education 2007 (pp. 1–14). Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society. http://ojs.ed.uiuc.edu/index.php/pes/issue/view/11

  • Laird, S. (2008b/2014). Mary Wollstonecraft: Philosophical mother of coeducation. London: Continuum, Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. (2010). “Make new friends, but keep the old”: The girl scout idea of educating girls and women. Educating Women: The Journal of the Society for Educating Women, 1(3). www.educatingwomen.net

  • Laird, S. (2013a). Bringing educational thought to public school lunch: Alice Waters and the Edible Schoolyard. Journal of Thought, 48(2), 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. (2013b). An obligation to endure. Critical Questions in Education, 4(2), 30–45. http://education.missouristate.edu/AcadEd/75532.htm

  • Laird, S. (2017). Learning to live in the Anthropocene: Our children and ourselves. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(3), 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lappé, F. M., & Lappé, A. (2003). Hope’s edge: The next diet for a small planet. New York: Jeremy M. Tarcher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. (2008). School lunch politics: The surprising history of America’s favorite welfare program. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. T. (2013). Postmodern dietetic: Reclaiming the body through the practice of alimentary freedom. Journal of Thought, 42(2), 28–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider. Trumansburg: Crossing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R. (1992). The schoolhome: Rethinking schools for changing families. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R. (1994). Excluding women from the educational realm. In Changing the educational landscape: Philosophy, women, and curriculum. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R. (2011). Education reconfigured: Culture, encounter, and change. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, K. C., & Edwards, A. C. (1936). The Dewey School. New York: D. Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamee, T. (2007). Alice Waters and Chez Panisse: The romantic, impractical, often eccentric, ultimately brilliant making of food revolution, with foreword by R.W. Apple, Jr. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method, with introduction by Henry W. Holmes (trans: George, A. E.). New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M. (1914). Dr. Montessori’s own and book. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montessori, M. (1949). The absorbent mind. Madras: The Theosophical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oklahoma State Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (May 2016). Civil rights and the school-to-prison pipeline in Oklahoma. Oklahoma City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppendieck, J. (2010). Free for all: Fixing school food in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, P. (Ed.). (2013). A place at the table: The crisis of 49 million hungry Americans and how to solve it. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapphire. (1997). Push. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shange, N. (1985). Betsey Brown. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulich, R. (Ed.). (1947). Three thousand years of educational wisdom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, A. (2005). Slow food, slow schools: Transforming education through a school lunch curriculum. Preface to Ten years of education: Edible Schoolyard. Berkeley, CA: Chez Panisse Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, A., & Duane, D. (2008). Edible schoolyard: A universal idea. San Francisco: Chronicle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2011). Why educational researchers should take school food seriously. In. Educational Researcher 40(1), 15–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/51058190

  • Weil, S. (1943, 1952). The need for roots: Prelude to a declaration of duties towards mankind, with preface by T.S. Eliot (trans: Wills, A.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Brown, J. D. (2012). Learning gardens and sustainability education: Bringing life to schools and schools to life. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Suzanne Rice for inviting me to participate in the study group on “moral dimensions of school lunch” that she founded in fall 2012 and for editing a special issue of our work for the Journal of Thought 48 (2), which included my article “Bringing Educational Thought to Public School Lunch,” pp. 12–27, from which this chapter grew. Thanks also to Amy Shuffelton for inviting my guest lecture, “Reconfiguring Public Education to Nourish,” which took me to the Edible Schoolyard in Berkeley, where Liza Siegler and Kyle Cornforth gave me a hospitable and informative tour of its garden and kitchen on April 30, 2013. I am grateful for indispensable assistance that Stefanie Heinrich gave me with the preparation of this manuscript and to the University of Oklahoma for supporting her work in spring 2017 as well as my research travels and sabbatical leave in 2013. Thanks also to Lawrence Baines, Scott Beck, Amy Bradshaw, Michael Brody, John Covaleskie, Bill Frick, John Green, Matthew Lewis, Brad Rowe, A.G. Rud , David Tan, and Nancy Snow, to generous audiences at the American Educational Studies Association (Seattle, November 3, 2012), Philosophy of Education Society (Portland, OR, March 16, 2013), American Educational Research Association’s SIG-Philosophical Studies in Education (San Francisco, April 27, 2013), Society of Philosophy and History of Education (St. Louis, September 30, 2014), and the Values and Leadership conference of the University Council for Educational Administration’s Consortium for the Study of Leadership and Ethics in Education (Pennsylvania State University, Rock Ethics Institute, October 15, 2015), for helpfully critical and otherwise instructive, encouraging responses to early work on this project, whose remaining gaps and flaws are entirely my own. My deep gratitude also to doctoral student leaders Brian Corpening, Julie Davis, and Elizabeth Wilkins in Educational Studies at the University of Oklahoma, who have taught me much about local school lunch cultures and the school-to-prison pipeline , and to students in a graduate School and Society seminar—Tina Bly, Lisa Kennerson Campbell, Krystal Golding-Ross, Elizabeth Kellogg, Micheal Rowley, Laura Sabetelli, Eric Sourie—whose field experiences and original theorizing of hidden curricula in urban school lunchrooms shocked us all with the urgent importance of rethinking school lunch.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laird, S. (2018). Alice Waters and the Edible Schoolyard: Rethinking School Lunch as Public Education. In: Rice, S., Rud, A. (eds) Educational Dimensions of School Lunch. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72517-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72517-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72516-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72517-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics