Skip to main content

The Main Concepts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economics as Applied Ethics
  • 90k Accesses

Abstract

In order to be able to make full use of the simple key to the analysis of economic policy questions that I have promised to supply in Chapter 1, it is necessary to clarify a few basic concepts. Boring, perhaps, but essential, like some boring facts that one invariably has to learn in order to practise any applied science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hume, 1739, 1998 edn., ed. Beauchamp: Appendix 1, para. 19.

  2. 2.

    Hume, 1739, www.davidhume.org:3.1.11.10. Hume’s defence of his theory of morality in general and of justice in particular was also presented, more briefly, just over ten years later, in An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals.

  3. 3.

    Mill, 1861:I,5.

  4. 4.

    Ethics, 1097b2–21. Aristotle did not, however, regard these as what he called ‘final values’, of which, in his opinion, there was only one, namely ‘happiness’ (interpreted in a rather special manner). The reason he gives for this is that although we might pursue them for their own sake, one might also pursue them for the sake of our happiness, whereas the converse does not apply.

  5. 5.

    Scanlon, 1998:87.

  6. 6.

    Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972.

  7. 7.

    Hume, 1739, ibid :3.1.1.27.

  8. 8.

    This definition originated in the important and influential book by Lionel Robbins, 1932. It abstracted from the question of how far an economy’s ‘scarce means’ are fully employed, since it was focused on the problem of allocation under conditions of scarcity.

  9. 9.

    See an interesting discussion of this point in Jonathan B. Wight, op.cit. 59 et seq.

  10. 10.

    Sen, 1987:4.

  11. 11.

    Scitovsky, 1941:77.

  12. 12.

    See Hands, 2009:13.

Bibliography

  • Hands, D.W., 2009 ‘The Positive – Normative Dichotomy in Economics’, in Thagard, P., and Woods, J. (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D., 1739, A Treatise of Human Nature, all references here are to the on-line version prepared by Peter Millican, at, www.davidhume.org.

  • Mill, J.S., 1861/2003, ‘Utilitarianism’, in Mary Warnock, (ed.), Utilitarianism and On Liberty, Blackwell, Oxford, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T., 1941, ‘A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics’, The Review of Economic Studies, 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1987, On Ethics and Economics, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T., 1998, What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA, Bellnap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beckerman, W. (2017). The Main Concepts. In: Economics as Applied Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50319-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50319-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50318-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50319-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics