Skip to main content

A Tool for Analyzing Variability Based on Functional Requirements and Testing Artifacts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Conceptual Modeling (ER 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9975))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1182 Accesses

Abstract

Analyzing differences among software artifacts is beneficial in a variety of scenarios, such as feasibility study, configuration management, and software product line engineering. Currently variability analysis is mainly done based on artifacts developed in a certain development phase (most notably, requirements engineering). We will demonstrate a tool that utilizes both functional requirements and test cases in order to analyze variability more comprehensively. The tool implements the ideas of SOVA R-TC method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acher, M., Cleve, A., Collet, P., Merle, P., Duchien, L., Lahire, P.: Reverse engineering architectural feature models. In: Crnkovic, I., Gruhn, V., Book, M. (eds.) ECSA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6903, pp. 220–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bakar, N.H., Kasirun, Z.M., Salleh, N.: Feature extraction approaches from natural language requirements for reuse in software product lines: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 106, 132–149 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol. 3, Ontology I: The Furniture of the World. Reidel, Boston (1977)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gildea, D., Jurafsky, D.: Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Comput. Linguist. 28(3), 245–288 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Itzik, N., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Wand, Y.: Variability analysis of requirements: considering behavioral differences and reflecting stakeholders perspectives. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (2016). doi:10.1109/TSE.2015.2512599

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kang, K.C., Cohen, S.G., Hess, J.A., Novak, W.E., Peterson, A.S.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical report (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kastner, C., Thum, T., Saake, G., Feigenspan, J., Leich, T., Wielgorz, F., Apel, S.: FeatureIDE: a tool framework for feature-oriented software development. In: 31st IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2009), pp. 611–614 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lacheiner, H., Ramler, R.: Application lifecycle management as infra-structure for software process improvement and evolution: experience and in-sights from industry. In: 37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA 2011), pp. 286–293 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, Y., Rubin, J., Chechik, M.: Semantic slicing of software version histories. In: 2015 30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), pp. 686–696. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. She, S., Lotufo, R., Berger, T., Wasowski, A., Czarnecki, K.: Reverse engineering feature models. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2011), pp. 461–470 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steinberger, M., Reinhartz-Berger, I.: Comprehensive Variability Analysis of Requirements and Testing Artifacts. In: Nurcan, S., Soffer, P., Bajec, M., Eder, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9694, pp. 461–475. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilde, N., Scully, M.: Software reconnaissance: mapping program features to code. Softw. Maintenance: Res. Prac. 7(1), 49–62 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iris Reinhartz-Berger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Screenshots from the Supporting Tool

Appendix: Screenshots from the Supporting Tool

Fig. 4.
figure 4

An example of an input file

Fig. 5.
figure 5

The parsed requirements

Fig. 6.
figure 6

The parsed test cases (pre = precondition, expected = expected results)

Fig. 7.
figure 7

Integrated parsing outcomes

Fig. 8.
figure 8

Similarity calculation results

Fig. 9.
figure 9

An example of a created feature diagram

(The requirements’ codes are in the form of rX_Y, where X is the number of product and Y is the number of the requirement in that product.

Going over a leaf with the mouse will present the text of the requirement.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Steinberger, M., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Tomer, A. (2016). A Tool for Analyzing Variability Based on Functional Requirements and Testing Artifacts. In: Link, S., Trujillo, J. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9975. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47717-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47717-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47716-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47717-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics