Skip to main content

Abstract

Although different metaheuristic algorithms have some differences in approaches to determine the optimum solution, however, their general performance is approximately the same. They start the optimization with random solutions, and the subsequent solutions are based on randomization and some other rules. With progressing the optimization process, the power of rules increases, and the power of randomization decreases. It seems that these rules can be modeled by a familiar concept of physics as well known as the fields of forces (FOF). FOF is a concept which is utilized in physics to explain the reason of the operation of the universe. The virtual FOF model is approximately simulated by using the concepts of real-world fields such as gravitational, magnetic, or electric fields (Kaveh and Talatahari [1]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2011) An enhanced charged system search for configuration optimization using the concept of fields of forces. Struct Multidiscip Optim 43(3):339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaveh A, Farahmand Azar B, Talatahari S (2008) Ant colony optimization for design of space trusses. Int J Space Struct 23(3):167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gribbin J (1998) Particle physics from A to Z. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2010) A novel heuristic optimization method: charged system search. Acta Mech 213(3–4):267–286

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2010) Optimal design of skeletal structures via the charged system search algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41(6):893–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2010) Charged system search for optimum grillage systems design using the LRFD-AISC code. J Constr Steel Res 66(6):767–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Imai K, Schmit LA (1981) Configuration optimisation of trusses. J Struct Div ASCE 107:745–756

    Google Scholar 

  8. Felix JE (1981) Shape optimization of trusses subjected to strength, displacement, and frequency constraints. M.Sc. thesis, Naval Postgraduate School

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rahami H, Kaveh A, Gholipoura Y (2008) Sizing, geometry and topology optimization of trusses via force method and genetic algorithm. Eng Struct 30:2360–2369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zheng QZ, Querin OM, Barton DC (2006) Geometry and sizing optimization of discrete structure using the genetic programming method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 231:452–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee KS, Geem ZW (2004) A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Comput Struct 82:781–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vanderplaats GN, Moses F (1972) Automated design of trusses for optimum geometry. J Struct Div ASCE 98:671–690

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang JP (1996) Development of genetic algorithm-based approach for structural optimization. Ph.D. thesis, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  14. Soh CK, Yang JP (1996) Fuzzy controlled genetic algorithm for shape optimization. J Comput Civil Eng ASCE 10(2):143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang JP, Soh CK (1997) Structural optimization by genetic algorithms with tournament selection. J Comput Civil Eng ASCE 11(3):195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu SJ, Chow PT (1995) Integrated discrete and configuration optimization of trusses using genetic algorithms. Comput Struct 55(4):695–702

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaveh A, Kalatjari V (2004) Size/geometry optimization of trusses by the force method and genetic algorithm. Z Angew Math Mech 84(5):347–357

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rajeev S, Krishnamoorthy CS (1997) Genetic algorithms based methodologies for design optimisation of trusses. J Struct Eng ASCE 123:350–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schutte JF, Groenwold AA (2003) Sizing design of truss structures using particle swarms. Struct Multidiscip Optim 25:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaveh A, Talatahari S (2009) Hybrid algorithm of harmony search, particle swarm and ant colony for structural design optimization, Chapter 5 of a book entitled: Harmony search algorithms for structural design optimization, edit. Z.W. Geem. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  21. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (1989) Manual of steel construction—allowable stress design, 9th edn. AISC, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaveh, A. (2017). Field of Forces Optimization. In: Advances in Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Structures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46173-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46173-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46172-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46173-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics