Skip to main content

The Vertical Infra-Areolar Approach to Nipple Skin-Sparing or Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Operative Approaches to Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

Abstract

The total skin-sparing mastectomy has become routinely offered to patients in our practice as the mastectomy has evolved from the radical, to modified radical, to simple mastectomy, then skin-sparing, and now total skin-sparing or nipple skin-sparing mastectomy. The current literature suggests that the total skin-sparing mastectomy is an oncologically safe procedure for patients, excluding those with involvement of the nipple-areola complex and those with skin involvement or inflammatory breast cancer. Throughout our experience with the total skin-sparing mastectomy, our techniques and inclusion criteria for the procedure have evolved as more data has become available.

We begin with our pre-incision injections for routine performance of the axillary reverse mapping procedure. This technique is used for sentinel lymph node biopsies as well as axillary lymph node dissections to minimize lymphedema of the ipsilateral upper extremity. Although our initial experience with the total skin-sparing mastectomy was mostly via an inframammary incision, we have transitioned to the vertical infra-areolar approach to the nipple-sparing mastectomy in most cases. This incision provides maximal preservation of the blood supply to the nipple and creates a superior cosmetic outcome to most other incisions as it sets the nipples in correct and matching position. However, we do recognize that there are exceptions, and we do utilize various other incisions when necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bland C, et al. The breast: comprehensive management of benign and malignant diseases. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vijayashree M, Chamberlain RS. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in modern breast practice. Clin Anat. 2013;26:56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty year follow up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;1233–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2010;11:927–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartman L, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Oreccchia P, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:333–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Margulies AG, Hochberg J, Kepple J, et al. Total skin sparing mastectomy without preservation of the nipple-areola complex. Am J Surg. 2005;190:920–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sufi P, Gittos M, Collier D. Envelope mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (EMIR). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26:367–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Crowe JP. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. JAMA Surg. 2004;148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, et al. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;699–704.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;623–633.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Piper M, Peled A, Foster R, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy, a systematic review of oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(4):435–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stolier AJ, Wang J. Terminal duct lobular units are scarce in the nipple: implications for prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(2):438–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;34:143–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang NS. Nipple-sparing mastecotmy in breast cancer: from an oncologic safety perspective. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128(16):2256–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(5):1341–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Taghian A, et al. Microscopic anatomy within the nipple: implications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2007;194:433–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Burdge EC, Yuen J, Hardee M, et al. Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3294–302. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3174-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:686–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klimberg VS, Rubio I, Henry R, et al. Intraoperative versus peritumoral injection for location of the sentnel node. Ann Surg. 1999;229(6):860–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson CB, Boneti C, Korourian S, et al. Intraoperative injection of subareolar or dermal radioisotope results in predicatable identification of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2011;254(4):612–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ochoa D, Korourian S, Boneti C, et al. Axillary reverse mapping: five-year experience. Surgery. 2014;1261–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Boneti C, Korourian S, Diaz Z, et al. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) to identify and protect lymphatics draining the arm during axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kiluk JV, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy through an inframammary incision for a nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;3402–3406.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wapnir I, Dua M, Kieryn A, et al. Intraoperative imaging of nipple perfusion patterns and ischemic complications in nipple-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:100–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Layeeque R, Hochberg J, Siegel E, et al. Botulinum toxin infiltration for pain control after mastectomy and expander reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):608–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Colwell AS. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Gland Surg [Online]. 2012;1.3:139–41.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Singh N, Reaven NL, Funk SE. Immediate 1-stage vs. tissue expander postmastectomy implant breast reconstructions: a retrospective real-world comparison over 18 months. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(7):917–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Munhoz AM, Montag E, Filassi JR, Gemperli R. Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: an update on oncological and reconstruction techniques. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5(3):478–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Suzanne Klimberg M.D., F.A.C.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rivere, A., Kumbla, P.A., Klimberg, V.S. (2017). The Vertical Infra-Areolar Approach to Nipple Skin-Sparing or Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy. In: Harness, J., Willey, S. (eds) Operative Approaches to Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43259-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43259-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43257-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43259-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics