Abstract
This paper presents the results of an empirical study aimed at characterizing and analyzing recurrent software development weaknesses in automotive industry. In the automotive domain software development is mainly demanded to specialized software suppliers that are required by car makers to improve and measure the process quality of their projects by applying process models such as Automotive SPICETM. The authors, as Automotive SPICE assessors, have directly recorded and identified specific software process improvement opportunities on the basis of the evidences gathered from real software development projects during a significant number of assessments performed at several organizations world-wide. This paper, that focuses specifically on the software testing-related processes, is a step of a wider study that the authors are carrying out. Such a study aims at identifying, using data from real automotive software development projects, common software development weaknesses having negative impact according Automotive SPICETM, in order to derive a picture of the state of the practice of software development in automotive and to provide researchers and practitioners with a reference for improvement initiatives aimed at solving those weaknesses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Automotive SPICE, Process Assessment Model (PAM) v2.5 (2010)
Automotive SPICE, Process Reference Model (PRM) v4.5 (2010)
ISO/IEC 33000 – Information Technology – Process Assessment, International Organization for Standardization (2013)
Hoermann, K., Mueller, M., Dittman, L., Zimmer, J.: Automotive SPICE in Practice: Surviving Implementation and Assessment. Rocky Noor, Santa Barbara (2008). ISBN 978-1933952291
Fabbrini, F., Fusani, M., Lami, G., Sivera, E.: A SPICE-based supplier qualification mechanism in automotive industry. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. J. 12, 523–528 (2007). Wiley InterScience
Hollander, M., Wolfe, D.A., Chicken, E.: Nonparametric Statistical Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2014)
ISO 26262 - Road Vehicles - Functional Safety, International Organization for Standardization (2011)
Niazi, M., Wilson, D., Zowghi, D.: Critical success factors for software improvement implementation: an empirical study. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 11, 193–211 (2006). Wiley InterScience
Niazi, M., Ali Babar, M., Verner, J.M.: Software process improvement barriers: a cross-cultural comparison. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52, 1204–1216 (2010). Elsevier
Hall, T., Rainer, A., Baddoo, N.: Implementing software process improvement: an empirical study. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 7, 3–15 (2002). Wiley InterScience
Kan, S.H.: Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering. Addison-Wesley Longman Publication, Boston (2002)
Benjamini, Y.: Opening the box of a boxplot. Am. Stat. 42(4), 257–262 (1988)
Biscoglio, I., Falcini, F., Lami, G.: Investigation on common software process weaknesses in automotive. In: ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), Beijing (China) 22–23 October 2015, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
ANNEX A
ANNEX A
See Table 6.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lami, G., Biscoglio, I., Falcini, F. (2016). An Empirical Study on Software Testing Practices in Automotive. In: Clarke, P., O'Connor, R., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (eds) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 609. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38980-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38980-6_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38979-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38980-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)