Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Multilevel Network Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multilevel Network Analysis for the Social Sciences

Part of the book series: Methodos Series ((METH,volume 12))

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to illustrate some of the benefits of understanding formal organizations as multilevel network systems by examining the interdependence between formal and social interaction in organizations. We show how such an approach supports a more informative and contextually richer representation of the interdependences between formal and informal relations in organizations. We document the existence, complexity, and context-dependence of the relationships linking informal networks between lower-level actors (individuals in the case that we will be presenting) to formal networks between higher-level actors (subsidiary units in our case) in organizations. We argue that ignoring the formal relations existing between higher-level units may lead to overestimating the autonomy of social networks from the formal authority structure existing within organizations. Because authority relations cross-cut organizational levels, this issue cannot be fully addressed in studies of social networks within organizations conducted at a single level. We argue that the unique value of the most recent generation of MERGMs is to turn this problem into empirically testable hypotheses. Using field data that we have collected on communication and advice relations among the 47 members of a top management team within an international multiunit industrial group we show how this weakness may be addressed. We exploit the natural multilevel structure of social networks within organizations to specify and estimate MERGMs for different intra-organizational networks (advice and communication). We show that the effects of formal structure on social networks are contingent upon the specific kind of network that is being considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., Beckman, S. L., & Epple, D. (1990). The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science, 36, 140–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A., & Ingram, P. (2002). Interorganizational learning and network organization: Toward a behavioral theory of the interfirm. In M. Augier & J.G. March (Eds.), The Economics of Choice, Change, and Organization: Essays in Memory of Richard M. Cyert (pp. 191–218). Cheltenham, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J. (2004). Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science, 15(3), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J. (2000). Networks and frog ponds: Trends in multilevel research. In K. J. Klein & W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 557–571). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 441–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiger, R. L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53(2), 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiger, R., & Ennis, J. (1997). Generalized exchange in social networks: Statistics and structure. L’Année Sociologique (1940/1948), 47(1), 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). The social structure of competition. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 57–91). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas1. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in the reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 366–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multi-theoretical multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2001). Beyond answers: Dimensions of the advice network. Social Networks, 23(3), 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13, 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, D. R., & Handcock, M. S. (2006). Inference in curved exponential family models for networks. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 565–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, A. M., Stuart, T. E., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organization Science, 24(5), 1316–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. R. (1993). Informal networks. Harvard Business Review, 71, 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, E. (2001). The collegial phenomenon: The social mechanisms of cooperation among peers in a corporate law partnership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, E., & Pattison, P. E. (1999). Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: A case study. Social Networks, 21(1), 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazega, E., Jourda, M. T., Mounier, L., & Stofer, R. (2008). Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design. Social Networks, 30(2), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomi, A., & Torló, V. J. (2014). The network dynamics of social status: Problems and possibilities. In S. P. Borgatti, D. J. Brass, D. S. Halgin, J. Labianca, & A. Mehra (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on organizational social network analysis (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, pp. 399–416). Sydney: Emerald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomi, A., Lusher, D., Pattison, P. E., & Robins, G. (2014). The focused organization of advice relations: A study in boundary crossing. Organization Science, 25, 438–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., Soda, G., & Tortoriello, M. (2014). More formally: Rediscovering the missing link between formal organization and informal social structure1. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 299–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moliterno, T. P., & Mahony, D. M. (2011). Network theory of organization: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management, 37(2), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2001). Emergence of communication networks. In The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 440–502) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H., Labianca, G., & Chung, M. H. (2006). A multilevel model of group social capital. Academy of Management Review, 31, 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. B. (1970). Organizational analysis: A sociological view. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market 1. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 673–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Y., & Argote, L. (2011). Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 189–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Y., Carley, K. M., & Argote, L. (2006). The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Science, 52(5), 671–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, G. L., & Lusher, D. (2013). Illustrations: Simulation, estimation and goodness of fit. In D. Lusher, J. Koskinen, & G. L. Robins (Eds.), Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods and applications (pp. 167–186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, G. L., Pattison, P. E., & Wang, P. (2009). Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: Exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 31(2), 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B. (2002). Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models. Journal of Social Structure, 3(2), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., Pattison, P. E., Robins, G. L., & Handcock, M. S. (2006). New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36(1), 99–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tortoriello, M., Reagans, R., & McEvily, W. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23(4), 1024–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., Robins, G. L., Pattison, P. E., & Lazega, E. (2013). Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks. Social Networks, 35(1), 96–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., Robins, G.L., Pattison, P.E. & Lazega, E. (2015). Social selection models for multilevel networks. Social Networks, doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.12.003 (in press).

  • White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Fonds National Suisse de la Recherche Scientifique (Swiss National Science Foundation. SNSF Grant 615 number CRSII1_147666/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Social Network Analysis Research Center, Faculty of Economics, University of Italian Switzerland, Via G. Buffi, 13, 6904, Lugano, Switzerland

    Paola Zappa & Alessandro Lomi

Authors
  1. Paola Zappa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessandro Lomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Zappa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. CSO-CNRS, Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris, SPC, Paris, France

    Emmanuel Lazega

  2. Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

    Tom A.B. Snijders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zappa, P., Lomi, A. (2016). Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Multilevel Network Analysis. In: Lazega, E., Snijders, T. (eds) Multilevel Network Analysis for the Social Sciences. Methodos Series, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24520-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24520-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24518-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24520-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation