Abstract
Breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has many advantages when compared to other reconstructive methods with autologous tissue, namely reduced donor-site morbidity or manipulation of the soft tissue, positioning it as a preferred option in autologous breast reconstruction for many microsurgeons worldwide.
Venous congestion is regarded as one of the main concerns for microsurgeons during reconstruction with the DIEP flap, where complications secondary to venous drainage or venous anastomosis have been shown to be more common than problems concerning arterial anastomosis or insufficiency. The anastomosis between the superficial and deep venous system results in significant fewer operative take-backs, with a decreased incidence of venous complications when using the DIEP flap.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cronin TD, Gerow FJ (1963) Augmentation mammoplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis. Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, pp 41–49
Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, Dellacroce FJ, Sullivan SK, Boraski J, Metzinger SE, Dupin CL, Allen RJ (2004) A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(4):1153–1160
Scheer AS, Novak CB, Neligan PC, Lipa JE (2006) Complications associated with breast reconstruction using a perforator flap compared with a free TRAM flap. Ann Plast Surg 56(4):355–358
Blondeel PN, Arnstein M, Verstraete K, Depuydt K, Van Landuyt KH, Monstrey SJ, Kroll SS (2000) Venous congestion and blood flow in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(6):1295–1299
Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN (2002) Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(2):466–475
Chen CM, Halvorson EG, Disa JJ, McCarthy C, Hu QY, Pusic AL, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ (2007) Immediate postoperative complications in DIEP versus free/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(6):1477–1482
Tran NV, Buchel EW, Convery PA (2007) Microvascular complications of DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(5):1397–1405
Enajat M, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Smit JM, Acosta R (2010) A single center comparison of one versus two venous anastomoses in 564 consecutive DIEP flaps: investigating the effect on venous congestion and flap survival. Microsurgery 30(3):185–191
Kroll SS (2000) Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(3):576–583
Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M, Arbique G, Brown SA (2008) Arterial and venous anatomies of the deep inferior epigastric perforator and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(6):1909–1919
Xin Q, Luan J, Mu H, Mu L (2012) Augmentation of venous drainage in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: efficacy and advancement. J Reconstr Microsurg 28(5):313–318
Sbitany H, Mirzabeigi MN, Kovach SJ, Wu LC, Serletti JM (2012) Strategies for recognizing and managing intraoperative venous congestion in abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(4):809–815
Momeni A, Lee GK (2010) A case of intraoperative venous congestion of the entire DIEP-flap–a novel salvage technique and review of the literature. Microsurgery 30(6):443–446
Ali R, Bernier C, Lin YT, Ching WC, Rodriguez EP, Cardenas-Mejia A, Henry SL, Evans GR, Cheng MH (2010) Surgical strategies to salvage the venous compromised deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 65(4):398–406
Boutros SG (2013) Double venous system drainage in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a single-surgeon experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(4):671–676
Carramenha e Costa MA, Carriquiry C, Vasconez LO, Grotting JC, Herrera RH, Windle BH (1987) An anatomic study of the venous drainage of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 79(2):208–217
Schaverien MV, Ludman CN, Neil-Dwyer J, Perks AG, Raurell A, Rasheed T, McCulley SJ (2010) Relationship between venous congestion and intraflap venous anatomy in DIEP flaps using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(2):385–392
Cohn AB, Walton RL (2006) Immediate autologous breast reconstruction using muscle-sparing TRAM flaps with superficial epigastric system turbocharging: a salvage option. J Reconstr Microsurg 22(3):153–156
Niranjan NS, Khandwala AR, Mackenzie DM (2001) Venous augmentation of the free TRAM flap. Br J Plast Surg 54(4):335–337
Tutor EG, Auba C, Benito A, Rábago G, Kreutler W (2002) Easy venous superdrainage in DIEP flap breast reconstruction through the intercostal branch. J Reconstr Microsurg 18(7):595–598
Kerr-Valentic MA, Gottlieb LJ, Agarwal JP (2009) The retrograde limb of the internal mammary vein: an additional outflow option in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(3):717–721
Wechselberger G, Schoeller T, Bauer T, Ninkovic M, Otto A, Ninkovic M (2001) Venous superdrainage in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(1):162–166
Guzzetti T, Thione A (2008) The basilic vein: an alternative drainage of DIEP flap in severe venous congestion. Microsurgery 28(7):555–558
Reardon CM, O’Ceallaigh S, O’Sullivan ST (2004) An anatomical study of the superficial inferior epigastric vessels in humans. Br J Plast Surg 57(6):515–519
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boutros, S.G., Martinez, C.A. (2016). Double Venous System Drainage in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Breast Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18726-6_80
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18726-6_80
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18725-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18726-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)