Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Need for a Turning Point in Megaprojects Planning and Appraisal Practices—The Case of the Italian Section of the Mediterranean Corridor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mega Transport Infrastructure Planning

Abstract

Megaprojects can be defined as extremely complex infrastructure projects, costing typically more than US$1 billion, presenting usually long development cycles (in some cases even several decades) and generating substantial (direct and indirect) impacts on communities, environments and budgets. This complexity, in particular, has to be considered not merely in engineering terms, but rather, it arises from the external context into which such projects are placed involving a number of actors and variables whose trends and mutual interactions are difficult to predict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to the most recent revision of the TEN-T Programme (2011), Corridor 5 is now called Mediterranean Corridor, stretching from Spain to the Ukrainian border. From its original conception it has undergone a number of modifications, including extensions to Lisbon and Kiev in the attempt to spread the possible economic benefits derived from the project. However, owing to a difficult economic situation, both Portugal and Ukraine seem to have renounced to the project.

  2. 2.

    HSR lines are typically designed for passenger travel. Although freight trains can use HSR lines, they cannot run at high speeds mainly for security reasons.

References

  • Amos, P., Bullock, D., & Sondhi, J. (2010). High-speed rail: The fast track to economic development? World Bank report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baghai, M., Coley, S., & White D. (1999). The alchemy of growth: Kickstarting and sustaining growth in your company. London: Texere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister, D., Berechman, J. (2000). Transport investment and economic development. London: UCL Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beretta, E., Dalle Vacche, A., & Migliardi, A. (2009). Il Sistema Portuale Italiano: Un’Indagine sui Fattori di Competitività e di Sviluppo. Banca d’Italia, Questioni di economia e finanza (occasional papers), vol. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beria, P., & Grimaldi, R. (2011). An early evaluation of Italian high speed projects. TeMALab Journal of Mobility, Land Use and Environment, 3, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertolini, L., & Salet, W. (2008). Coping with complexity and uncertainty in mega projects: Linking strategic choices and operational decision making. OMEGA Center working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bologna, S. (2006). Val di Susa: Un Tunnel per Trasportare Aria? ItaliaMondo—Logistica & Intermodalità, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brambilla, M., Erba, S., & Ponti, M. (2003). Analisi Economiche dei Progetti della Legge Obiettivo, 6th SIET Scientific Meeting, Palermo, 13–14 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, C., & Girmscheid, G. (2007). Complexity of megaprojects. In R. Milford, T. C. Haupt (Eds.), Construction for development: Proceedings of CIB world building congress 2007 (pp. 219–230). Cape Town: Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunello, L. (2011). Investigation to enhance high speed rail accessibility, Queensland University of Technology, PhD thesis. Brisbane, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calafati, A. (2006). Dove sono le Ragioni del Sì? La “Tav in Val di Susa” nella Società della Conoscenza. Laissez-Passer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capka, R. J. (2004). Megaprojects—They are a different breed. Public Roads, 68(1), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). Hauling the future. The guardian, 13 December, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Censis. (2009). Il Disegno dell’Interportualità Italiana. Milan: Franco Angeli Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conferta, Kearney, A. T. (2011). La Logistica Italiana. Research report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council. (2004). Decision No. 884/2004/EC, Amending Decision No. 1692/96/EC on community guidelines for the development of the Trans-European transport network. Official Journal, L167/1, 30/4/2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rus, G., & Nombela, G. (2007). Is investment in high speed rail socially profitable? Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41(1), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2010a). From the City-Port to the Network-Port. Unpublished Dissertation submitted to the University of Udine in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science (MSc) degrees in Civil Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2010b). Possibili strategie per il Rilancio dell’Interporto di Cervignano. Rassegna Tecnica del FVG n.6, pp. 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M., & Fabbro, S. (2011). In between corridors and gateways—Rethinking “The Logistic Platforms in Italy—The case of the North-Adriatic Gateway. Paper prepared for the IX European Biennial of Towns and Town Planners, 14–17 September, Genoa, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degano, C. (2010). Alta Velocità, ma Tempi Infiniti. In R. Vecchiet (Ed.), Corridoio Cinque—Storia, Problemi e Prospettive. Conference Proceedings, Triest 23–24 Februay 2007, Istituto Gramsci del Friuli Venezia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriou, H.T. (2009). Globalization, mega transport projects and private finance. Paper prepared for the VREF (Volvo Research Volvo Research and Educational Foundations) 4th International Conference on Future Urban Transport, Gothenburg, April 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010). European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2005). TEN-T priority axes and projects 2005. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Progress report 2012—Implementation of the TEN-T priority projects.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbro, S. (2011). Nuove prospettive per la specialità. Messaggero Veneto, 13 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbro, S., & Dean, M. (2012). Transport infrastructures and regional development strategies: The Case of the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, Paper prepared for the VII International Conference on Informatics and Urban and Regional Planning, 10–12 May, Cagliari, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbro, S., & Mesolella, A. (2010). Multilevel spatial visions and territorial cohesion. Italian regional planning between the TEN-T Corridors, ESDP polycentrism and governmental “Strategic Platforms”. Planning Practice and Research, 25(1), 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk—An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, K. (2005). The making and un-making on the San Francisco-Oakland bay bridge: A case in megaproject planning and decision-making. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannino, C. (2010). Inquadramento della Ricerca nell’Ambito delle Politiche Pubbliche sulle Infrastrutture in Italia. In S. Fabbro, A. Mesolella (Eds.), Le Piattaforme Territoriali Strategiche—Esiti e Prospettive. Istituto Nazionale di Urbanistica (INU)—Commissione Nazionale sulle Politiche Infrastrutturali, Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannopoulous, G., & Gillespie, A. (1993). Transport and communications innovation in Europe. London: Belhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givoni, M. (2006). Development and Impact of the modern high-speed train: A review. Transport Reviews, 26(5), 593–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1999). High-speed train and Aair: Competitive or complementary? Paper presented at the Lake Arrowhead Transportation Symposium, 25 October 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth, M., & Ducatel, K. (1992). Transport in the information age: Wheels and wires. New York: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honsell, F., Maresca, M., & Malinconico, C. (2006). Oltre Trieste…l’Europa. Una Sintesi sulla Strategia dei Trasporti e della Mobilità nella Regione Friuli, Venezia Giulia, Slovenia e Istria. Udine: Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legambiente (2011). Dieci anni di legge obiettivo, 2001–2010 Bilancio della legge che avrebbe dovuto rilanciare le infrastrutture in Italia, Roma, 24 febbraio 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maranzana, S. (2012). Trieste-Divaccia L’Europa è pronta a tagliare 50 milioni. Il Piccolo, 25 giugno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotto, A. (2004). Infrastrutture di Trasporto come Opere Territoriali. Note per una Riflessione a partire dal Caso della Linea AV Ronchi-Trieste. Conference Proceedings, Udine 13 Febraury, Università degli Studi di Udine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, S-M. H., & Givoni, M. (2009). The accessibility impact of a new high-speed rail line in the UK—A preliminary analysis of winners and losers. Working paper n. 1041, Transport Studies Unit School of Geography and the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, L. (2000). The machine in the garden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L., & Lessard, D.R. (2000). Strategic management of large engineering projects: Shaping institutions, risks, and governance. Cambridge: The MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIT—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e del Trasporto. (2007). DPEF 2008–2012 Allegato E Piattaforme Territoriali Transnazionali: schede di diagnosi strategica. http://www.mit.gov.it/mit/mop_all.php?p_id=04044 (p. 2) Accessed 27 Sept 2013.

  • MIT—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti. 2012. Programma Infrastrutture Strategiche—10° Allegato Infrastrutture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mistero dello Sviluppo Economico (2007). Quadro Strategico Nazionale per la Politica Regionale di Sviluppo 2007–2013, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P., & Blaas E. (1994). Impact assessment a evaluation in transport planning. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, D. (1994). American technological sublime. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, K. (2001). Globalization and urban change—Capital, culture and Pacific rim mega-projects. Oxford geographical and environmental studies. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMEGA Centre. (2008). Generic lesson for improving the treatment of risk, uncertainty and complexity in the planning of mega urban transport projects. London: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omega Centre. (2010). Incorporating principles of sustainable development within the design and delivery of major projects: An international study with particular reference to major infrastructure projects for the institution of civil engineering and the actuarial profession. London: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omega Centre. (2011). Lessons for decision-makers: A comparative analysis of selected large-scale transport infrastructure projects in Europe, USA and Asia-Pacific. London: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plassard, F. (1991). Le Train à Grande Vitesse et le Rréseau des Villes. Transports, 345, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponti, M. (2003). La Leggenda del Corridoio 5, www.lavoce.info.

  • Priemus, H. (2008). How to improve the early stage of decision-making on mega-projects. In H. Priemus, B. Flyvbjerg, & B. van Wee (Eds.), Decision-making on mega-projects: cost-benefit analysis, planning and innovation. Cheltenha: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Priemus, H. (2010). Decision-making on mega-projects: Drifting on political discontinuity and market dynamics. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 10, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priemus, H., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., & Giezen, M., (2013). Dealing with complexity, uncertainties and risk of mega-projects: Redundancy, resilience and adaptivity. In H. Priemus & B. van Wee (Eds.), International handbook on mega-projects (pp. 83–110). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prud’homme, R. (2008). I Faraonici Progetti dell’Unione Europea. www.notav-valsangone.eu.

  • RAFVG—Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia. (2011). Piano Regionale delle Infrastrutture di Trasporto, della Mobilità delle Merci, e della Logistica. Quadro conoscitivo. L.R. 20 Agosto 2007, n. 23, art. 3 ter e s.m.i. Trieste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastello, L., & De Benedetti, A. (2013). Binario Morto. Lisbona-Kiev. Alla Scoperta del Corridoio 5 e dell’Alta Velocità che non c’è. Chiarelettere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salet, W., Bertolini, L., & Giezen, M. (2012). Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salet, W., Bertolini, L., & Giezen, M. (2013). Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 1984–2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samset, K., (2010). Early project appraisal––Making the initial choices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott Wilson Business Consultancy. (2007). Studio strategico per lo Sviluppo del Corridoio Paneuropeo V (Progetto Prioritario Numero 6). Final report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirovich, L. (2010). Le incognite sul Tracciato In R. Vecchiet (Ed.), Corridoio Cinque—Storia, Problemi e Prospettive. Conference Proceedings, Triest 23–24 Februay 2007, Istituto Gramsci del Friuli Venezia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (1994). The shrinking continent: New time-space maps of Europe. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21(6), 653–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickerman, R. (1997). High-speed rail in Europe: Experience and issues for future development. Annals of Regional Science, 31, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, London, UK

    Marco Dean

Authors
  1. Marco Dean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Dean .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering & Architecture, University of Udine, Udine, Italy

    Sandro Fabbro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dean, M. (2015). The Need for a Turning Point in Megaprojects Planning and Appraisal Practices—The Case of the Italian Section of the Mediterranean Corridor. In: Fabbro, S. (eds) Mega Transport Infrastructure Planning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16396-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16396-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16395-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16396-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation