Skip to main content

Inferring the Scale of OpenStreetMap Features

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
OpenStreetMap in GIScience

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

Traditionally, national mapping agencies produced datasets and map products for a low number of specified and internally consistent scales, i.e. at a common level of detail (LoD). With the advent of projects like OpenStreetMap, data users are increasingly confronted with the task of dealing with heterogeneously detailed and scaled geodata. Knowing the scale of geodata is very important for mapping processes such as for generalization of label placement or land-cover studies for instance. In the following chapter, we review and compare two concurrent approaches at automatically assigning scale to OSM objects. The first approach is based on a multi-criteria decision making model, with a rationalist approach for defining and parameterizing the respective criteria, yielding five broad LoD classes. The second approach attempts to identify a single metric from an analysis process, which is then used to interpolate a scale equivalence. Both approaches are combined and tested against well-known Corine data, resulting in an improvement of the scale inference process. The chapter closes with a presentation of the most pressing open problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barron C, Neis P, Zipf A (2013) Towards intrinsic quality analysis of OpenStreetMap datasets. In: Online proceedings of the international workshop on action and interaction in volunteered geographic information (ACTIVITY). Agile

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereuter P, Weibel R (2013) Real-time generalization of point data in mobile and web mapping using quadtrees. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 40(4):271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biljecki F, Ledoux H, Stoter J, Zhao J (2014) Formalisation of the level of detail in 3D city modelling. Comput Environ Urban Syst 48:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chave J (2013) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: what have we learned in 20 years? Ecol Lett 16:4–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JH (1976) Hierarchical geometric models for visible surface algorithms. Commun ACM 19(10):547–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton G (1999) Scale, sinuosity and point selection in digital line generalization. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 26(1):33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feick R, Robertson C (2014) A multi-scale approach to exploring urban places in geotagged photographs. Comput Environ Urban Syst (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrogott M (eds) (2005a) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys of international series in operations research and management science, vol 78. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Mousseau V, Roy B (2005b) ELECTRE methods. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrogott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 133–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag U (1962) Der Kartenmaßstab—Betrachtungen über den Maßstabsbegriff in der Kartographie. Kartographische Nachrichten, Heft 5,12. Jahrgang, Gütersloh, pp 134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Girres J-F (2011) An evaluation of the impact of cartographic generalisation on length measurement computed from linear vector databases. In: Proceedings of 25th international cartographic conference (ICC’11), Paris, France. ICA

    Google Scholar 

  • Girres J-F, Touya G (2010) Quality assessment of the french OpenStreetMap dataset. Trans GIS 14(4):435–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF, Li L (2012) Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spat Stat 1:110–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosso E, Perret J, Brasebin M (2012) GEOXYGENE: an interoperable platform for geographical application development. In: Innovative software development in GIS (Chapter 3), Wiley, New York, pp 67–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggett P, Chorley RJ, Stoddart DR (1965) Scale standards in geographical research: a new measure of areal magnitude. Nature 205:844–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay M (2010) How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 37(4):682–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay M, Basiouka S, Antoniou V, Ather A (2010) How many volunteers does it take to map an area well? The validity of linus’s law to volunteered geographic information. Cartogr J 47(4):315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keßler C, de Groot RT (2013) Trust as a proxy measure for the quality of volunteered geographic information in the case of OpenStreetMap. In: Vandenbroucke D, Bucher B, Crompvoets J (eds) Geographic information science at the heart of Europe. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer International Publishing, New York, pp 21–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe TH (2009) Representing and exchanging 3D city models with CityGML. In: Lee J, Zlatanova S (eds) 3D Geo-information sciences. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73(6):1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondzech J, Sester M (2011) Quality analysis of OpenStreetMap data based on application needs. Cartogr Int J Geogr Inf Geovisual 46(2):115–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney P, Corcoran P (2012) The annotation process in OpenStreetMap. Trans GIS 16(4):561–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer A, Kempf C, Rylov M, Neis P (2014) Assigning scale equivalencies to OpenStreetMap polygons. In: Proceedings of AutoCarto international symposium on automated cartography 2014 (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz R, Li Y, Nakano L (2007) Measuring visual clutter. J Vis 7(2):17

    Google Scholar 

  • Sester M, Jokar Arsanjani J, Klammer R, Burghardt D, Haunert J-H (2014) Integrating and generalising volunteered geographic information. In: Burghardt D, Duchêne C, Mackaness W (eds) Abstracting geographic data in a data rich world. Springer, Berlin, pp 119–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlatidou A, Haklay M, Cheng T (2011) Trust in web GIS: the role of the trustee attributes in the design of trustworthy web GIS applications. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(12):1913–1930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhardt U (1999) Die Theorie der geographischen Dimensionen in der Angewandten Landschaftsökologie. In: Schneider-Sliwa et al (eds) Angewandte Landschaftsökologie. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoter J, Burghardt D, Duchêne C, Baella B, Bakker N, Blok C, Pla M, Regnauld N, Touya G, Schmid S (2009) Methodology for evaluating automated map generalization in commercial software. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33(5):311–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudgen D, Hamilton P (1971) Scale, systems and regional geography. Area 3(3):139–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds. Anchor Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer F, Pillewizer W (1966) The principle of selection. Cartogr J 3:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer F (1979) Kartographische generalisierung, 2nd edn. VEB Hermann Haack, Gotha

    Google Scholar 

  • Touya G (2012) What is the level of detail of OpenStreetMap? In: Workshop on role of volunteered geographic information in advancing science: quality and credibility. Columbus (Ohio), USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Touya G, Brando-Escobar C (2013) Detecting level-of-detail inconsistencies in volunteered geographic information data sets. Cartogr Int J Geogr Inf Geovisual 48(2):134–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Touya G, Baley M (2014) Harmonizing level of details in OpenStreetMap based maps. In: Duckham M, Stewart K, Pebesma E (eds) Proceedings of GIScience 2014—Poster session, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielstra D, Zipf A (2010) A comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. In: Proceedings of 13th Agile international conference on geographic information science. Guimaraes, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Touya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Touya, G., Reimer, A. (2015). Inferring the Scale of OpenStreetMap Features. In: Jokar Arsanjani, J., Zipf, A., Mooney, P., Helbich, M. (eds) OpenStreetMap in GIScience. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14280-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics