Abstract
The concrete, the immediate, is always particular—this is virtually a truism. To stop there would make it impossible to understand the history of humanity. This seems—at the phenomenal level—as if it were composed of a succession of particular trajectories and evolutions, without any connections with each other, except by chance. Each of these successions can only be explained by particular causalities and sequences of events. This method reinforces the tendency towards ‘culturalisms’, that is, the idea that each ‘people’ is identified by the specifics of its ‘culture’, which are mostly ‘transhistoric’, in the sense that they persist in spite of change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This chapter was extracted from my book: Ending the crisis of capitalism or Ending Capitalism (Oxford: Fahamu Books, 2011): 40ff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Amin, S. (2014). The Two Paths of Historical Development: The Contrast Between Europe and China. In: Theory is History. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice(), vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03816-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03816-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03815-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03816-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)