Abstract
The gig economy continues to disrupt different traditional markets such as transport, accommodation, and domestic work in the global South. The gig economy offers flexibility, autonomy and higher earning potential for gig workers. However, it is not without its challenges such as precarious working arrangements, occupational hazards and employment uncertainty. This study explores key survival strategies employed by domestic workers offering their services through one of South Africa’s prominent gig platforms that specializes in domestic work. The study used semi-structured interviews with questions based on an adapted conceptual framework based on Folkman’s cognitive theory of stress and coping. Three main categories of challenges face domestic workers in the gig economy: application induced technology challenges such as platform usability; occupation-specific challenges such as exposure to dangerous and unhealthy environments; and gig work induced service perceptions such as unrealistic expectations. These challenges result in negative consequences such as personal trauma, exhaustion and financial loss. Workers report feeling exploited and unsure about their relationship with the platform. The workers adopt various problem-focused, emotion-focused, support-seeking, and meaning-making survival strategies that include avoiding bookings by previously problematic customers, negotiating alternative terms with customers outside of the app, enduring traumatic experiences and complying with unreasonable demands. Platforms should consider financial and relationship transparency in their relationship with gig workers as well as affording gig workers more choice and flexibility regarding client bookings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Van Doorn, N.: Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20(6), 898–914 (2017)
Donovan, S.A., Bradley, D.H., Shimabukuru, J.O.: What Does the Gig Economy Mean for Workers? CRS Report R44365, 2 May 2016
Hunt, A., Machingura, F.: A good gig? The rise of on-demand domestic work. Overseas Development Institute, London (2016)
Statistics South Africa: Quarterly Labour Force Survey Quarter 2: 2019, Statistics South Africa, Pretoria (2019)
Dokko, J., Mumford, M., Schanzenbach, D.W.: Workers and the online gig economy. The Hamilton Project, pp. 1–8 (2015)
Pandor, D.A.: Interview, Rand Merchant Bank Solutionist Thinking. [Interview], 1 April 2019
Burger, R., Von Fintel, M., Van der Watt, C.: Household social mobility for paid domestic workers and other low-skilled women employed in South Africa. Feminist Economics 24(3), 29–55 (2018)
Fish, J.N.: Engendering democracy: domestic labour and coalition-building in South Africa. J. South. Afr. Stud. 32(1), 107–127 (2006)
de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., Basole, R.: The digital platform: a research agenda. J. Inf. Technol. 33(2), 124–135 (2018)
Mothobi, M., Schoentgen, A., Gillwald, A.: What is the state of microwork in Africa? A view from seven countries. Research ICT Africa, Cape Town (2017)
Bamu, P.: A pluralistic approach to organizing migrant domestic workers: the case of the Zimbabwe-South Africa global care chain. Int. J. Comp. Labour Law Ind. Relat. 34(3), 313–344 (2018)
Healy, J., Nicholson, D., Pekarek, A.: Should we take the gig economy seriously? Labour Ind. J. Soc. Econ. 27(3), 232–248 (2017)
Sutherland, W., Jarrahi, M.H.: The sharing economy and digital platforms: a review and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 43, 328–341 (2018)
Macaulay, T.: Could a working conditions rating system protect gig economy workers?, 9 April 2019. https://www.techworld.com/tech-innovation/new-rating-system-for-digital-platforms-aims-protect-gig-workers-3694758/
Bajwa, U., Knorr, L., Ruggiero, E.D., Gastaldo, D., Zendel, A.: Towards an understanding of workers’ experiences in the global gig economy. University of Toronto, Toronto (2018)
De Stefano, V.: The rise of the just-in-time workforce: on-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comp. Lab. L. Pol’y J. 37, 471 (2015)
Ashford, S.J., Caza, B.B., Reid, E.M.: From surviving to thriving in the gig economy: a research agenda for individuals in the new world of work. Res. Organ. Behav. 38, 23–41 (2018)
Howard, J.: Nonstandard work arrangements and worker health and safety. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60, 1–10 (2017)
Mpofu, T., Tsibolane, P., van Belle, J.P.: Risks and risk-mitigation strategies of gig economy workers in the global south: the case of ride-hailing in Cape Town. In: 2020 IFIP WG 9.4 European Conference on the Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries Proceedings, Salford, UK (2020)
Fairwork Foundation, Second round of Fairwork’s yearly platform ratings in South Africa launched! (2020). https://fair.work/second-round-of-fairworks-yearly-platform-ratings-in-south-africa-launched/
International Labour Office: Convention No. 189 Decent work for domestic workers. International Labour Office, Geneva (2011)
International Labour Office: Domestic workers across the world: Global and regional statistics and the extent of legal protection. ILO, Geneva (2013)
Dreyer, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., Hamann, R., Faccer, K.: Upsides and downsides of the sharing economy: collaborative consumption business models’ stakeholder value impacts and their relationship to context. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 125, 87–104 (2017)
Todolí-Signes, A.: The ‘gig economy’: employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation. Eur. Rev. Labour Res. 23(2), 193–205 (2017)
Government of the Republic of South Africa: Act No.9 National Minimum Wage Act, Government of the Republic of South Africa, Cape Town (2018)
Moore, P.: The threat of physical and psychosocial violence and harassment in digitalized work. International Labour Organisation, Geneva (2018)
Florito, J., Aneja, U., de Sanfeliu, M.B.: Gender economic equity and the future of work: a future of work that works for women. CIPPEC, Buenos Aires (2018)
Sohail, M., Rehman, C.A.: Stress and health at the workplace-a review of the literature. J. Bus. Stud. Q. 6(3), 94–121 (2015)
Folkman, S.: Personal control and stress and coping processes: a theoretical analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46(4), 839–852 (1984)
Echemendia, R.J., Webbe, F.M., Merritt, V.C., González, G.: Assessment in sports: psychological and neuropsychological approaches. In: Handbook of Psychological Assessment, pp. 275–304. Academic Press (2019)
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students, pp. 122–161. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (2016)
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2013)
Ginsburg, R.: Come in the dark: domestic workers and their rooms in apartheid-era Johannesburg, South Africa. Perspect. Vernac. Archit. 8, 83–100 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lesala Khethisa, B., Tsibolane, P., Van Belle, JP. (2020). Surviving the Gig Economy in the Global South: How Cape Town Domestic Workers Cope. In: Bandi, R.K., C. R., R., Klein, S., Madon, S., Monteiro, E. (eds) The Future of Digital Work: The Challenge of Inequality. IFIPJWC 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 601. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64697-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64697-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64696-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64697-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)