Skip to main content

Conclusion: Reform, Reinvention, and Renewal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governing the Anthropocene
  • 802 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter uses the ideas that we are witnessing the end of biodiversity and the death of restoration as a provocation to consider the future of conservation and restoration in the Anthropocene. It revisits the debates about novel ecosystems, transforming landscapes, and changing governance; explores what these debates might mean for each of the domains of change discussed in this book; and suggests potential pathways forward. Frontiers for future research on the topics of novel ecosystems, transformation, and governance are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Backstrom, A. C. et al. (2018) ‘Grappling with the social dimensions of novel ecosystems’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(2), pp. 109–117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnosky, A. D. et al. (2011) ‘Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?’, Nature. Nature Publishing Group, pp. 51–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09678.

  • Bowman, D. (1998a) ‘Death of biodiversity-the urgent need for global ecology’, Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters. JSTOR, 7, pp. 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, D. M. J. S. (1998b) ‘The impact of Aboriginal landscape burning on the Australian biota’, New Phytologist. Wiley-Blackwell, 140(3), pp. 385–410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1998.00289.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, O. et al. (2017) ‘Mapping Scenario Narratives: A Technique to Enhance Landscape-scale Biodiversity Planning’, Conservation and Society, 15(2), pp. 179–188. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_15_121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, P. M. (2011) ‘Global climate change means never going home again’, Marine Pollution Bulletin, pp. 2269–2270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.08.031.

  • Chermack, T. J. (2004) ‘Improving decision-making with scenario planning’, Futures, 36(3), pp. 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, S., Moore, S. A. and Lockwood, M. (2016) ‘Letting the managers manage: Analyzing capacity to conserve biodiversity in a cross-border protected area network’, Ecology and Society, 21(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08171-210339.

  • Colloff, M. J., Lavorel, S., et al. (2017) ‘Transforming conservation science and practice for a postnormal world’, Conservation Biology, p. online. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12912.

  • CSIRO (2020) Core Concepts: Transformative Adaptation Research Alliance. Available at: https://research.csiro.au/tara/core-concepts/ (Accessed: 1 July 2020).

  • Gray, S. et al. (2020) ‘Strengthening coastal adaptation planning through scenario analysis: A beneficial but incomplete solution’, Marine Policy. Elsevier Ltd, 111, p. 102391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. et al. (2012) Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, D. H. (2014) ‘Understanding “anticipatory governance”’, Social Studies of Science, 44(2), pp. 218–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713508669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisschemöller, M. and Hoppe, R. (1995) ‘Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis’, Knowledge and Policy, 8(4), pp. 40–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kerkhoff, L. (2014) ‘Knowledge governance for sustainable development: a review’, Challenges in sustainability, 1(2), pp. 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopf, R. K. et al. (2015) ‘Anthropocene Baselines: Assessing Change and Managing Biodiversity in Human-Dominated Aquatic Ecosystems’, BioScience, 65(8), pp. 798–811. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel, S. et al. (2019) ‘Mustering the power of ecosystems for adaptation to climate change’, Environmental Science and Policy, 92(July 2018), pp. 87–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.010.

  • Light, A. (2012) ‘The death of restoration?’, in Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change: Human Virtues of the Future. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 105–121.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. et al. (2015) ‘Scenario analysis for biodiversity conservation: A social-ecological system approach in the Australian Alps’, Journal of Environmental Management, 150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.013.

  • Mitchell, M., Lockwood, M., Moore, S. A. and Clement, S. (2016) ‘Building systems-based scenario narratives for novel biodiversity futures in an agricultural landscape’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.09.003.

  • Mitchell, M., Lockwood, M., Moore, S. A., Clement, S., et al. (2016) ‘Using scenario planning to assess governance reforms for enhancing biodiversity outcomes’, Land Use Policy, 50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.020.

  • Preiser, R. and Woermann, M. (2019) ‘Complexity, philosophy and ethics’, in Galaz, V. (ed.) Global Challenges, Governance, and Complexity. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 38–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wyborn, C. et al. (2020) Research and action agenda for sustaining diverse and just futures for life on Earth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Clement .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clement, S. (2021). Conclusion: Reform, Reinvention, and Renewal. In: Governing the Anthropocene . Palgrave Studies in Environmental Policy and Regulation . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60350-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics