Skip to main content

Why a Developmental Perspective Matters for Intercultural Language Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developing Intercultural Language Learning
  • 435 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents the theoretical case for adopting a developmental perspective on intercultural language teaching and learning and lays the conceptual foundation for the remainder of the book. The discussion is presented in two sections. The first section briefly traces recent paradigm shifts in second language learning, and the reframing of the goals of languages education. An intercultural and multilingual orientation is considered in relation to how it may be realised through curriculum design and the language teacher’s pedagogical stance. The second section examines contemporary understandings of development, in particular a bioecological view of human development and its value in considering development of intercultural language learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACARA. (2011). Shape of the Australian curriculum: Languages. Sydney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Revised ed.). New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. M., Bennett, M. J., & Allen, W. (2003). Developing intercultural competence in the language classroom. In D. L. Lange & M. Paige (Eds.), Culture as the core: Perspectives on culture in second language learning (pp. 237–270). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21–72). Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, M. (2019). Perspectives: (Re)considering the role of emotion in language teaching and learning. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 515–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 793–828). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M. (1995). Intercultural competence and mobility in multinational contexts: A European view. In M. L. Tickoo (Ed.), Language and culture in multilingual societies: Viewpoints and visions (pp. 21–36). Singapore: SEAMO Regional Language Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M. (2010). Linguistic and cultural education for Bildung and citizenship. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M. (2014). Twenty-five years on—From cultural studies to intercultural citizenship. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27, 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M., Golubeva, I., Han, H., & Wagner, M. (2017). From principles to practice in education for intercultural citizenship. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M., Nichols, A., & Stephens, D. (2001). Developing intercultural competence in practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M., & Wagner, M. (2018). Making a difference: Language teaching for intercultural and international dialogue. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 140–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd Clark, J. (2020). Reflexivity and criticality for language and intercultural communication research and practice. In J. Jackson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (2nd ed., pp. 86–106). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. H., & Norris, J. M. (2010). Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 94(Suppl.), 1–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2011). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review, 2, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities, Review in Research in Education, 24, 249–306, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V. J. (1992). Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning Journal, 42, 557–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V. J., & Li Wei. (2016a). The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V. J., & Li Wei (Eds.). (2016b). Cambridge handbook of linguistic multicompetence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment: Companion volume with new descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozet, C., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2000). Teaching culture as an integrated part of language: Implications for the aims, approaches and pedagogies of language teaching. In A. J. Liddicoat & C. Crozet (Eds.), Teaching languages, teaching cultures. Language Australia: Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 5–24). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, F. (2017). “I find it odd that people have to highlight other people’s differences - even when there are none”: Experiential learning and interculturality in teacher education. International Review of Education, 86, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivation to learn a foreign/second language. In Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow, UK: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N. C. (2007). Dynamic systems and SLA: The wood and the trees. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 10(1), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728906002744.

  • Garcia, O., & Wei, Li. (2015). Translanguaging, bilingualism and bilingual education. In W. E. Wright, S. Boun, & O. García (Eds.), The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education (1st ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S., & Kalish, C. (2007). Conceptual development. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 687–733). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1999). The notion of ‘context’ in language education. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics (pp. 1–24). Philadelphia: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (2014). The process of becoming reflexive and intercultural: Navigating study abroad and reentry experience. In J. Byrd Clark & F. Dervin (Eds.), Reflexivity and multimodality in language education: Rethinking multilingualism and interculturality in accelerating, complex and transnational spaces (pp. 43–53). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, E. (2016). Intercultural learning in modern language education: Expanding meaning-making potentials. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, M. (2015). Teachers as mediators in the foreign language classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, M., & Scarino, A. (2018). Attending to diversities through curriculum design: The case of languages in the Australian curriculum. In A. Reid & D. Price (Eds.), The Australian curriculum: Promises, problems, prospects (pp. 115–126). Melbourne: The Australian Curriculum Studies Association (ACSA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. (1999). Thirdness: The intercultural stance. In T. Vestergaard (Ed.), Language, culture and identity. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 249–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. (2008). Ecological perspectives on foreign language education. Language Teaching, 41(3), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject: What foreign language learners say about their experience and why it matters. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. (2011). The symbolic dimensions of the intercultural. Language Teaching, 44(3), 354–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 296–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings: Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics Advance Access, 29, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Saying what we mean: Making a case for ‘language acquisition’ to become ‘language development’. Language Teaching, 48(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C., & Scarino, A. (2016). Reonceptualizing the nature of goals and outcomes in language/s education. The Modern Language Journal, 100(Suppl.), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12300-0026-7902/16/81-95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, G. S. (2020). A human ecological language pedagogy. Modern Language Journal, 104(Suppl.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddicoat, A. J., & Scarino, A. (2013). Intercultural language teaching and learning. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liddicoat, A. J., Scarino, A., Papademetre, L., & Kohler, M. (2003). Report on intercultural language learning. Retrieved from Canberra. http://www1.curriculum.edu.au/nalsas/pdf/intercultural.pdf.

  • McNamara, T. (2019). Language and subjectivity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCSSFL and ACTFL. (2017). NCSSFL-ACTFL can-do statements. Retrieved from https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/ncssfl-actfl-can-do-statements.

  • Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, R. M., Jorstad, H., Siaya, L., Klein, F., & Colby, J. (Eds.). (2003). Culture learning in language education: A review of the literature. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passarelli, A. M., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Using experiential learning theory to promote student learning and development in programs of education abroad. In M. Vande Berg, M. Page, & K. Lou (Eds.), Student learning abroad (pp. 137–161). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porto, M. (2019). Long-term impact of four intercultural citizenship projects in the higher education foreign language classroom. The Language Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1656279.

  • Porto, M., Houghton, S., & Byram, M. (2017). Intercultural citizenship in the (foreign) language classroom. Language Teaching Research (Special Issue), 22, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, M. T. (2019). Elephants in the room: an ‘affective turn’ or just feeling our way? The Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 516–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarino, A. (2014). Learning as reciprocal, interpretive meaning-making. A view from collaborative research into the professional learning of teachers of languages. The Modern Language Journal (Special Issue), 98(1), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12068.x.

  • Scarino, A., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2009). Teaching and learning languages: A guide. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarino, A., Kohler, M., & Benedetti, A. (2014). Investigating pedagogies for language-and-culture learning. Retrieved from Adelaide, South Australia. https://www.decd.sa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net691/f/languages_pedagogies_report_final.pdf?v=1466990807.

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2015). Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(Suppl.), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978a). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978b). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Kohler .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kohler, M. (2020). Why a Developmental Perspective Matters for Intercultural Language Learning. In: Developing Intercultural Language Learning. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59113-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59113-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59112-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59113-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics