Abstract
In recent years, companies have been emphasizing several initiatives to address environmental concerns that have given rise to regulatory risks, natural resource constraints and climate change which have negatively affected the business prospects. Among the initiatives, closed loop operation is the most comprehensive one because of its potential to accomplish the lofty goal of “cradle to cradle” in which material resources used in a business cycle are returned back to their original states for reuse in the next cycle. In light of four interconnected studies, this chapter identifies the key elements of closed loop operations, analyzes their significance in business and environmental performance and suggests models and considerations for managing the operations cost-effectively. Specifically, the chapter articulates the significance of remanufacturing and reuse of used products as the corner stone of closed loop operations, recognizes the criticality of acquisition of high quality used products in adequate quantity for cost-effective remanufacturing, establishes the need for appropriate incentives to motivate consumers for timely return products, and highlights the significance of intense communication with internal and external stakeholders for effective integration for environmental operations. The exposition aims to aid in developing a unified understanding of closed loop operations and suggests directions for future research to address additional challenging issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37.
Beil, D. R., & Hopp, W. (2013). WDI Publishing, Product ID#: 1-429-292.
Bussofiane, A., Martin, S., & Parker, D. (1997). The impact of technical efficiency of the UK privatization programme. Applied Economics, 29(3), 297–310.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Lewin, A., & Seiford, L. (Eds.). (1994). Data envelopment analysis, theory, methodology and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2003). DEA models for identifying critical performance measures. Annals of Operations Research, 124(1), 225–244.
Cole, D., Mahapatra, S., & Webster, S. (2017). A comparison of buyback and trade-in policies to acquire used products for remanufacturing. Journal of Business Logistics, 38(3), 217–232.
Cook, J. A. (2014, Quarter 1). Green supply chains are still too costly. CSCM’s Supply Chain Quarterly. Retrieved from www.SupplyChainQuarterly.com
Dehnokhalaji, A., Korhonen, P. J., Köksalan, M., Nasrabadi, N., & Wallenius, J. (2010). Efficiency analysis to incorporate interval-scale data. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 1116–1121.
Epstein, M. J. (1996). Improving environmental management with full environmental cost accounting. Environmental Quality Management, 6(1), 11–22.
Joro, T., Korhonen, P., & Wallenius, J. (1998). Structural comparison of data envelopment analysis and multiple objective linear programming. Management Science, 44, 962–970.
Lee, D., & Lionel, B. (2007). Cradle-to-Cradle design at Herman Miller: Moving toward environmental sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business School Publications.
Link, S., & Naveh, E. (2006). Standardization and discretion: Does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 508–519.
Nga, J. K. H. (2009). The influence of ISO 14000 on firm performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 408–422.
O’Rourke, D., & Strand, R. (2017). Patagonia: Driving sustainable innovation by embracing tensions. California Management Review, 60(1), 102–125.
Orsato, R. J. (2006). When does it pay to be green? California Management Review, 48(2), 127–143.
Östlin, J., Sundin, E., & Björkman, M. (2009). Product life-cycle implications for remanufacturing strategies. Journal of cleaner production, 17(11), 999–1009.
Mahapatra, S., Pal, R., & Narasimhan, R. (2012). Hybrid (re)manufacturing: Manufacturing and operational implications. International Journal of Production Research, 50(14), 3786–3808.
Mahapatra, S., Pal, R., Hult, G. T. M., & Talluri, S. (2015). Assessment of proactive environmental initiatives: Evaluation of efficiency based on interval scale data. IEEE Transactions in Engineering Management, 62(2), 280–293.
Mahapatra, S., Barbieri, P., & Rahimian, S. (2020). A content-analytic understanding of factors contributing to the success of proactive environmental strategy. The International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 16(1), 1–28.
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.
Premachandra, I. M., Bhabra, G. S., & Sueyoshi, T. (2009). DEA as a tool for bankruptcy assessment: A comparative study with logistic regression technique. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(2), 412–424.
Roy, V., Schoenherr, T., & Charan, P. (2018). The thematic landscape of literature in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM): A review of the principal facets in SSCM development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(4), 1091–1124.
Sarkis, J. (2001). Manufacturing’s role in corporate environmental sustainability—Concerns for the new millennium. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5/6), 666–686.
Sousa, R., & Voss, C. A. (2008). Contingency research in operations management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), 697–713.
Thanassoulis, E., Kortelainen, M., Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2011). Costs and efficiency of higher education institutions in England: A DEA analysis. Journal of Operational Research, 62(7), 1282–1297.
Unruh, G. C. (2008). The biosphere rules. Harvard Business Review, 86(2), 111–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mahapatra, S., Cole, D., Pal, R., Webster, S. (2021). Towards a Unified Understanding and Management of Closed Loop Operations. In: Chen, C., Chen, Y., Jayaraman, V. (eds) Pursuing Sustainability. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 301. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58023-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58023-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58022-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58023-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)