Abstract
Weaving accounts of the history of science (HOS) into science instruction has been a popular technique by those interested in helping students understand the human side of science. Therefore, including elements of the HOS can be justified for this reason alone. However, a further justification for the use of HOS is its role in providing examples and context when teaching about elements of the nature of science. This chapter examples HOS instructional approaches and offers rationales for its use and an extensive taxonomy based on a review of the literature in this regard. Each of the seven distinct ways by which HOS can inform science teaching and learning is fully described with examples and considerations for use. The chapter concludes with a section detailing some of the challenges associated with a HOS focus in science instruction.
This chapter has been adapted from a presentation at the 8th International Conference for the History of Science in Science Education Maresias, Sao Sebastiao, Brazil, August 16–19, 2010, and from an article appearing as W. F. McComas (2010). The history of science and the future of science education: A typology of approaches to the history of science in science instruction. In Kokkotas, P.V., Malamitsa, K.S., and Rizaki, A.A. (Eds.) Adapting Historical Knowledge Production to the Classroom (pp. 37–54). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Permission to adapt and include this chapter here has kindly been granted by the publisher
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000a). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057–1095.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855.
Adúriz-Bravo, A., & Izquierdo-Aymerich, M. (2009). A research-informed instructional unit to teach the nature of science to pre-service science teachers. Science & Education, 18(9), 1177–1192.
Allchin, D. (1997). The power of history as a tool for teaching science. In A. Dally, T. Nielsen, & F. Reiss (Eds.), History and philosophy of science: A means to better scientific literacy? (pp. 70–98). Loccum: Evangelische Akadamie Loccum.
Allchin, D. (2003). Scientific myth conceptions. Science & Education, 87, 329–351.
Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of science: Perspectives and resources. Saint Paul: SHiPS Education Press.
Allchin, D., Anthony, E., Bristol, J., Dean, A., Hall, D., & Lieb, C. (1999). History of science -- with labs. Science & Education, 8, 619–632.
Allen, G., & Baker, J. (2001). Biology: scientific process and social issues. Maryland: Fitzgerald Science Press.
Baumel, H. B., & Berger, J. J. (1973). Biology: It’s people and its papers. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Becker, B. (2000). Mindworks. San Francisco: WestEd.
Blachowicz, J. (2009). How science textbooks treat scientific method: A philosopher’s perspective. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(2), 303–344.
Bloom, H. (1994). The Western Canon: The books and school of the ages. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Bowler, P. J., & Morus, I. R. (2005). Making modern science: A historical survey. Chicago/New York: The University of Chicago Press.
California Institute of Technology. (1985). The mechanical universe and beyond. Retrieved April 30, 2009 from http://www.learner.org/resources
Cavicchi, E. M. (2003). Experiences with the magnetism of conducting loops: Historical instruments, experimental replications, and productive confusions. American Journal of Physics, 71, 156–167.
Cavicchi, E. M. (2006). Faraday and Piaget: Experimenting in relation with the world. Perspectives on Science, 14(1), 66–96.
Cavicchi, E. M. (2008). Historical experiments in students’ hands: Unfragmenting science through action and history. Science & Education, 17, 717–749.
Cavicchi, E. M. (2009). Exploring mirrors, recreating science and history, becoming a class community. The New Educator, 5, 249–273.
Chang, H. (2011). How historical experiments can improve scientific knowledge and science education: The cases of boiling water and electrochemistry. Science & Education, 20(3–4), 317–341.
Christofi, C., & Davies, M. (1991). Science through Drama. Education in Science, 141, 28–29.
Clough, M. P. (2011). The story behind the science: Bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20(7), 701–717.
Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2004). The nature of science: Always part of the science story. The Science Teacher, 71, 28–31.
Conant, J. B. (1947). On understanding science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Conant, J. B., & Nash, L. K. (1948). Harvard case histories in experimental science volumes I and II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crawford, E. (1993). A critique of curriculum reform: Using history to develop thinking. Physics Education, 28, 204–208.
Dagher, Z., & Ford, D. (2005). How are scientists portrayed in children’s science biographies. Science & Education, 14, 377–393.
Darwin, C. (2002). Autobiographies. New York: Penguin Group.
Dedes, C., & Ravanis, K. (2009a). History of science and conceptual change: The formation of shadows by extended light sources. Science & Education, 18, 1135–1151.
Dedes, C., & Ravanis, K. (2009b). Teaching image formation by extended light sources. Research in Science Education, 39, 57–73.
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Duveen, J., & Solomon, J. (1994). The Great evolution trial: Use of role-play in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 575–582.
Educational Policies Commission. (1944). Educational policies Commission report on education of all American youth. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Eichman, P. (1996). Using history to teach biology. The American Biology Teacher, 58, 200–202.
Feynman, R. P. (2005). The meaning of it all: Thoughts of a citizen scientist. New York: Basic Books.
Fingon, J. C., & Fingon, S. D. (2009). What about Albert Einstein? Using biographies to promote students’ scientific thinking. Science Scope, 32, 51–55.
Fuselier, L. C., Jackson, J., & Stoiko, R. (2016). Social and Rational: The presentation of nature of science and the uptake of change in evolution textbooks. Science Education, 100(2), 239–265.
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). The influence of an historically oriented course on students’ content knowledge in optics evaluated by means of facets-schemes analysis’. Physics Education Research: A Supplement to the American Journal of Physics, 68(7), S3–S15.
Gleick, J. (2003). Isaac Newton. New York: Pantheon Books.
Hakim, J. (2005). The story of science: Newton at the center. Arlington: NSTA Press.
Harre, R. (1981). Great scientific experiments. Twenty experiments that changed our view of the world. Chelmsford: Courier Dover Publications.
Harwood, W. S., MaKinster, J. G., Cruz, L., & Gabel, D. (2002). Acting out science: Using senate hearings to debate global climate change. Journal of college science teaching, 31, 442–447.
Heering, P. (2000). Getting shocks: Teaching secondary school physics through history. Science & Education, 9, 363–373.
Heering, P. (2003). History-science-epistemology: On the use of historical experiments in physics teacher training. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), In Proceeding of the 6th international history, philosophy and science teaching group meeting (Denver, USA) [File 58 on CD ROM from IHPST.ORG].
Herreid, C. F. (1994). Case studies in science-A novel method of science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 221–229.
Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teacher’s guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Holton, G. (1969). Harvard project physics: A report on its aims and current status. Physics Education, 4, 19–25.
Holton, G. (2003). The Project Physics Course, then and now. Science & Education, 12, 779–785.
Holton, G., & Brush, S. G. (2001). Physics, the human adventure: From Copernicus to Einstein and beyond. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Hottecke, D. (2000). How and what can we learn from replicating historical experiments? A case study. Science & Education, 9, 342–362.
Irwin, A. R. (1996). A survey of the historical aspects of science in school textbooks. School science review, 78, 101–107.
Irwin, A. R. (2000). Historical case studies: teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, 84, 5–26.
Isaacson, W. (2007). Einstein: His life and universe. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Johnson, G. (2009). The ten most beautiful experiments. New York: Knopf.
Judson, H. F. (1996). The eighth day of creation. Cold Springs Harbor: Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory Press.
Kampourakis, K., & McComas, W. F. (2009). Using the history of biology to illustrate core nature of science ideas. In: Proceedings of the 5th Greek conference on history, philosophy & teaching of natural sciences: The great scientific theories in the teaching of natural sciences, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Kim, S. Y., & Irving, K. E. (2010). History of science as an instructional context: Student learning in genetics and nature of science. Science & Education, 19, 187–215.
Kindi, V. (2005). Should science teaching involve the history of science? An assessment of Kuhn’s view. Science & Education, 14, 721–731.
Kipnis, N. (1996). The “historical-investigative” approach to teaching science. Science & Education, 5, 277–292.
Klassen, S. (2006). The application of historical narrative in science learning: The Atlantic Cable Story. Science & Education, 16, 335–352.
Klopfer, L. E. (1964). History of Science Cases (HOSC). Chicago: Science Research Associates.
Kolsto, S. D. (2008). Science education for democratic citizenship through the history of science. Science & Education, 17(8/9), 977–997.
Leite, L. (2002). History of science in science education: Development and validation of a checklist for analyzing the historical content of science textbooks. Science & Education, 11, 353–359.
Lin, H. S., & Chen, C. C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773–792.
Lind, G. (1979). The history of science cases (HOSC): Nine units of instruction in the history of science. European Journal of Science Education, 1(3), 293–299.
Lovedahl, A. N., & Bricker, P. (2006). Using biographies in science class. Science and Children, 44, 38–43.
Maddox, B. (2002). Rosalind Franklin: The dark lady of DNA. New York: HarperCollins.
Matthews, M. R. (1992). History, philosophy and science teaching: The present rapprochement. Science & Education, 1(1), 11–48.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching, the role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
McComas, W. F. (1997). The discovery and nature of evolution by natural selection: Misconceptions and lessons learned from the history of science. American Biology Teacher, 59, 492–500.
McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2/3), 249–263.
Metcalfe, R. J. A., et al. (1984). Teaching Science through Drama: An Empirical Investigation. Research in Science and Technological Education, 2, 77–81.
Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: a model for the development of pedagogy. Science Education, 81(4), 405–424.
National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Niaz, M. (1998). From cathode rays to alpha particles to quantum of action: A rational reconstruction of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Science Education, 82, 527–552.
Palmieri, P. (2008). Reenacting Galileo’s experiments: Rediscovering the techniques of seventeenth-century science. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.
Public Broadcasting System (PBS). Science programming on air and online. http://pbs.org/wgbh.nova/
Raman, V. V. (1980). Teaching Aristotelian Physics through a Dialogue. Physics Teacher, 18(8), 580–583.
Rasmussen, S. C. (2007). The history of science as a tool to identify and confront pseudoscience. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 949–951.
Roach, L. E. (1995). Putting people back in science: Using historical vignettes. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 365–370.
Roach, L. E., & Wandersee, J. H. (1993). Short story science. The Science Teacher, 60, 18–21.
Rudge, D. W., & Howe, E. M. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 18, 561–580.
Rudge, D. W., Cassidy, D. P., Fulford, J. M., & Howe, E. M. (2014). Changes observed in views of nature of science during a historically based unit. Science & Education, 23(9), 1879–1909.
Rutherford, J. (2001). Fostering the history of science in American science education. Science & Education, 10, 569–580.
Serafini, A. (2001). The epic history of biology. Boulder: Perseus Publishing Company.
Seroglou, F., Koumaras, P., & Tselfes, V. (1998). History of science and instructional design: the case of electromagnetism. Science & Education, 7, 261–280.
Settle, T. B. (1961). An experiment in the history of science. Science, 33, 19–23.
Shamos, M. (1987). Great experiments in physics. New York: Dover Publications.
Sherratt, W. J. (1982). History of science in the science curriculum: An historical perspective Part I: Early interest and role advocated. School Science Review, 64, 225–236.
Sherratt, W. J. (1983). History of science in the science curriculum: An historical perspective. Part II: Interest shown by teachers. School Science Review, 64, 418–424.
Sobel, D. (1995). Longitude: The true story of a lone genius who solved the greatest problem of his time. New York: Walker and Co..
Sobel, D. (1999). Galileo’s daughter: A historical memoir of science, faith, and love. New York: Walker and Co..
Solomon, J. (1989). The retrial of Galileo. In: Paper presented at the The First International History, Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching Conference Tallahassee.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scott, L., & MaCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the Nature of Science through History: Action Research in the Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409–421.
Steelman, J. R. (1947). Manpower for research: volume 4 of science and public policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Stinner, A., & Tecihman, J. (2003). Lord Kelvin and the Age-of-the-Earth Debate: A dramatization. Science and Education, 12(2), 213–228.
Summers, G., Decker, T., & Barrow, L. (2007). The treatment of geological time and the history of life on Earth in high school biology textbooks. American biology teacher, 69, 401–405.
van den Berg, E. (2009). Theater in Physics Teacher Education. Physics Teacher, 47(6), 350–352.
Viana, H. E. B., & Porto, P. A. (2010). The development of Dalton’s atomic theory as a case study in the history of science: Reflections for educators in chemistry. Science and Education, 19, 75–90.
Walker, R. (1993). Historical science experiments on file. New York: Facts on File, Inc..
Wang, H. A. (1999). A content analysis of the history of science in the national science education standards and four secondary science textbooks. ERIC ED431608.
Watson, J. D. (1996). The Double Helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. C. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171, 737–738.
Watson, J. D., & Stent, G. S. (Eds.). (1980). Double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Whitfield, D. H. (2007). What’s the matter? Readings in physics. Chicago: The Great Books Foundation.
Wider, W. (2006). Science as story communicating the nature of science through historical perspectives on science. American Biology Teacher, 68, 200–205.
Williams, B., Clough, M. P., Stanley, M., Dawson, J. P., & Cervato, C. (2010). A very deep question: Just how old is Earth?http://www.storybehindthescience.org/pdf/earthsage2.pdf. The story behind the science: Bring science and scientists to life project website, http://www.storybehindthescience.org
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McComas, W.F. (2020). A Typology of Approaches for the Use of History of Science in Science Instruction. In: McComas, W.F. (eds) Nature of Science in Science Instruction. Science: Philosophy, History and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57238-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57239-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)