Skip to main content

Management of Bleeding Associated with Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Bleeding Patients

Abstract

Heart failure patients that require mechanical circulatory support with a ventricular assist device (VAD) are at a high risk of bleeding due to the underlying physiology of their disease, the physical presence of the VAD, and the requirement of antithrombotic therapy. The VAD pump itself can influence hematologic, inflammatory, and immunologic parameters that can disrupt the hemostatic process. Continuous flow VADs are now more frequently used compared to the older, pulsatile flow devices due to their smaller size and reduced risk of thrombosis. These benefits are marginally offset by the higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding seen in patients using continuous flow devices. It is important that healthcare providers responsible for the management of these patients be prepared to deal with potential bleeding events appropriately.

Management of bleeding in this specific patient population is difficult due to their high risk of thrombosis and frequency of rebleeding. Characteristics of the bleed such as the type, severity, and location need to be considered before any therapeutic interventions are made. Gastrointestinal bleeding and hemorrhagic cerebral vascular events are the most common types of bleeds in the VAD population and are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Techniques to manage and prevent bleeding can include medical therapy, procedural diagnostic interventions, changes to the intensity of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, and reduction of VAD speed. Major bleeding frequently results in discontinuation of an antiplatelet agent or a reduction in target INR range. Antithrombotic therapy should be resumed as soon as bleeding has resolved and baseline hemostasis has been achieved. In general, all patients that experience a bleeding event should be evaluated and treated on an individualized basis based on the patient and event specific factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137:e67–e492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson SR, Givertz MM, Stewart GC, Mudge GH. Ventricular assist devices: the challenges of outpatient management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1647–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jezovnik MK, Gregoric ID, Poredos P. Medical complications in patients with LVAD devices. ESC. 2017;14:37.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, et al. Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1080–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Connors JM. Anticoagulation management of left ventricular assist devices. Am J Hematol. 2015;90:175–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. SynCardia Product Overview. Mktg-854 Rev 002 2018-08. Available at http://syncardia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Mktg-854_Rev_002.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2019.

  7. Cook JA, Shah KB, Quader MA, et al. The total artificial heart. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(12):2172–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Copeland JG, Smith RG, Arabia FA, et al. Cardiac replacement with a total artificial heart as a bridge to transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:859–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JH, Cowger JA, Shah P. The evolution of mechanical circulatory support. Cardiol Clin. 2018;36:443–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskoqitz AJ, et al. Long-term use of a left-ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1435–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, et al. Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(9):885–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eckman PM, John R. Hemorrhage and thrombosis in patients with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices. Circulation. 2012;125:3038–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kreuziger LB, Massicotte MP. Mechanical circulatory support: balancing hemorrhage and clotting in high-risk patients. Hematology. 2015:61–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shah P, Tantry US, Bliden KP, Gurbel PA. Bleeding and thrombosis associated with ventricular assist device therapy. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1164–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DeStefano C, Sylvester K, Connors J, et al. Warfarin management in the setting of FVII deficiency and mechanical circulatory support. Vasc Med. 2017;22(4):345–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koene RJ, Win S, Naksuk N, et al. HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of bleeding and thrombotic risk after continuous-flow ventricular assist device implantation. J Card Fail. 2014;20(11):800–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Linneweber J, Dohmen PM, Dohmen KU, et al. The effect of surface roughness on activation of the coagulation system and platelet adhesion in rotary blood pumps. Artif Organs. 2007;31:345–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feldman D, Pamboukian SV, Teuteberg JJ, et al. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(2):157–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cook JL, Colvin M, Francis GS, et al. Recommendations for the use of mechanical circulatory support: ambulatory and community patient care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e1145–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sandner SE, Riebandt J, Haberl T, Mahr S, Rajek A, Schima H, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin for anti-coagulation after left ventricular assist device implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33:88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. John R, Kamdar F, Liao K, et al. Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the Heartmate II left ventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:1318–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Andreas M, Moayedifar R, Wieselthaler, et al. Increased thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared with vitamin K antagonism in left ventricular assist device patients: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10(5):e003709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jennings D, McDonell J, Schillig J. Assessment of long-term anticoagulation in patients with a continuous-flow left-ventricular assist device: a pilot study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(1):e1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Halder LC, Richardson LB, Garberich RF, et al. Time in therapeutic range for left ventricular assist device patients anticoagulated with warfarin: a correlation to clinical outcomes. ASAIO J. 2017;63(1):37–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Boehme AK, Pamboukian SV, George JF, et al. Anticoagulation control in patients with ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J. 2017;63:759–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bishop MA, Streiff MB, Ensor CR, et al. Pharmacist-managed international normalized ratio patient self-testing is associated with increased time in therapeutic range in patients with left ventricular assist devices at an academic medical center. ASAIO J. 2014;60(2):193–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Martinez BK, Yik B, Tran R, et al. Meta-analysis of time in therapeutic range in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients receiving warfarin: anticoagulation control in LVADs. Artif Organs. 2018 Jul;42(7):700–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Levesque A, Lewin A, Rimsans J, et al. Development of multidisciplinary anticoagulation management guidelines for patients receiving durable mechanical circulatory support. CATH 2019 (Pending Publication).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Crow S, Chen D, Milano C, Thomas W, Joyce L, Piacentino V III, et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in continuous-flow ventricular assist device recipients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1263–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Borden M, Kiernan MS, Pham DT, Denofrio D, Sylvia L. Bridging with half-therapeutic dose enoxaparin in outpatients with left ventricular assist devices and sub-therapeutic international normalized ratios. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(6):860–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bhatia A, Juricek C, Sarswat N, et al. Increased risk of bleeding in left ventricular assist device patients treated with enoxaparin as bridge to therapeutic international normalized ratio. ASAIO J. 2018;64(2):140–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cheng A, Williamitis C, Slaughter M. Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility? Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;3(6):573–851.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Carnicelli AP, Thakkar A, Deicicchi DJ, et al. Resource utilization and hospital readmission associated with gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019;47(3):375–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-018-1781-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Birks E. Stopping LVAD bleeding: a piece of the puzzle. Circ Res. 2017;121:902–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shrode C, Draper K, Huang R, et al. Significantly higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding and thromboembolic events with left ventricular assist devices. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1461–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Strueber M, Larbalestier R, Jansz P, et al. Results of the post-market Registry to Evaluate the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist System (ReVOLVE). J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33:486–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Slaughter M, Pagani F, McGee E, et al. HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:675–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Aggarwal A, Pant R, Kumar S, et al. Incidence and management of gastrointestinal bleeding with continuous flow assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1534–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bhat P, Nssaif M, Sparrow C, et al. Epistaxis in patients with left ventricular assist devices – incidence, risk factors, and implications. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;32:246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean M. Connors .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Collins, P., Sylvester, K.W., Connors, J.M. (2021). Management of Bleeding Associated with Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support. In: Teruya, J. (eds) Management of Bleeding Patients. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56338-7_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56338-7_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56337-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56338-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics