Skip to main content

Intimate Partner Violence: Law Enforcement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intimate Partner Violence

Abstract

In order to remedy domestic violence, the services of law enforcement are often called upon. This dynamic can become complicated when intimate partner violence involves an offer of the law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson AS, Lo CC. Intimate partner violence within law enforcement families. J Interpers Violence. 2011;26(6):1176–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson LB. Police officers: gender comparisons. The encyclopedia of police science. 2nd ed. New York: Garland; 1995. p. 591–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neidig PH, Russell HE, Seng AF. Interspousal aggression in law enforcement families: a preliminary investigation. Police Stud Int Rev Police Dev. 1992;15:30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Waters JA, Ussery W. Police stress: history, contributing factors, symptoms, and interventions. Policing Int J Police Strategies Manag. 2007;30(2):20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Can SH, Hendy HM. Police stressors, negative outcomes associated with them and coping mechanisms that may reduce these associations. Police J. 2014;87(3):167–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Griffin SP, Bernard TJ. Angry aggression among police officers. Police Q. 2003;6(1):3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonifacio P. Criminal justice and public safety. The psychological effects of police work: a psychodynamic approach. New York: Springer. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roberts NA, Levenson RW. The remains of the workday: impact of job stress and exhaustion on marital interaction in police couples. J Marriage Fam. 2001;63(4):1052–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson LB, Todd M, Subramanian G. Violence in police families: work-family spillover. J Family Violence. 2005;20(1):3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bailey WG, editor. The encyclopedia of police science. New York: Taylor & Francis; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Armacost BE. Organizational culture and police misconduct. George Washington Law Rev. 2004;72(3):453–546.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gershon RR, Barocas B, Canton AN, Li X, Vlahov D. Mental, physical, and behavioral outcomes associated with perceived work stress in police officers. Criminal Justice Behav. 2009;36(3):275–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Swatt ML, Gibson CL, Piquero NL. Exploring the utility of general strain theory in explaining problematic alcohol consumption by police officers. J Criminal Justice. 2007;35(6):596–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson LB. On the front lines: police stress and family well-being. In: Hearing before the select committee on children, youth, and families house of representatives: 102 congress first session 1991, vol. 20, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hall GB, Dollard MF, Tuckey MR, Winefield AH, Thompson BM. Job demands, work-family conflict, and emotional exhaustion in police officers: a longitudinal test of competing theories. J Occupational Organizational Psychol. 2010;83(1):237–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aaron JD. Stress and coping in police officers. Police Q. 2000;3(4):438–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beehr TA, Johnson LB, Nieva R. Occupational stress: coping of police and their spouses. J Organizational Behav. 1995;16(1):3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Russell BL, Pappas N. Officer involved domestic violence: a future of uniform response and transparency. Int J Police Sci Manag. 2018;20(2):134–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stinson PM, Liederbach J. Fox in the henhouse: a study of police officers arrested for crimes associated with domestic and/or family violence. Criminal Justice Policy Rev. 2013;24(5):601–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ammons J. Batterers with badges: officer-involved domestic violence. Women Law J. 2004;90:28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lonsway K, Wetendorf DE, Conis P. Lessons learned from Tacoma: the problem of police officer domestic violence. Law Enforcement Executive Forum. 2003;3(5):27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Violanti JM. Homicide-suicide in police families: aggression full circle. Int J Emerg Mental Health. 2007;9(2):97.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eliason S. Murder-suicide: a review of the recent literature. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law Online. 2009;37(3):371–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tucker JM. Police officer willingness to use stress intervention services: the role of perceived organizational support (POS), confidentiality and stigma. Int J Emerg Mental Health Human Resilience. 2015;17(1):304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahn Kennedy Bailey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Williams, M., Bailey, R.K. (2021). Intimate Partner Violence: Law Enforcement. In: Bailey, R.K. (eds) Intimate Partner Violence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55864-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55864-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55863-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55864-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics