Abstract
A precise estimate of the evapotranspiration (ET) partitioning is fundamental for determining the crop water needs and optimizing irrigation management. The plant transpiration (T) is generally considered to be the most desirable component, increasing the flow of T within the ET could be one of the most important actions to save water in semi-arid agricultural regions. Given the lack of reference method to estimate the E/T partitioning of wheat crop, this study inter-compares four different methods based on eddy covariance, sap flow and lysimetry measurements and FAO modeling. The objectives are: i) quantify T and ET flows using different approaches and ii) evaluate the response of the FAO dual approach model to different periods of stress. Results indicate that despite the small surface sensed by mini-lysimeters, the partitioning ratio is evaluated more precisely (19% relative error) with lysimetry than with the other systems (any combination of eddy covariance, lysimetry and sap flow measurements). Moreover, stem-scale T measurements from sap flow sensors are subject to representativeness issues at the field scale, and to systematic errors during water-stress and senescence periods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agam, N., Evett, S.R., Tolk, J.A., Kustas, W.P., Colaizzi, P.D., Alfieri, J.G., McKee, L.G., Copeland, K.S., Howell, T.A., Chávez, J.L.: Evaporative loss from irrigated interrows in a highly advective semi-arid agricultural area. Adv. Water Resour. 50, 20–30 (2012)
Leuning, R., Condon, A.G., Dunin, F.X., Zegelin, S., Denmead, O.T.: Rainfall interception and evaporation from soil below a wheat canopy. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 67(3–4), 221–238 (1994)
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56 (1998)
Kool, D., Agam, N., Lazarovitch, N., Heitman, J.L., Sauer, T.J., Ben-Gal, A.: A review of approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 184, 56–70 (2014)
Boast, C.W., Robertson, T.M.: A “micro-lysimeter” method for determining evaporation from bare soil: description and laboratory evaluation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46(4), 689–696 (1982)
Daamen, C.C., Simmonds, L.P., Wallace, J.S., Laryea, K.B., Sivakumar, M.V.K.: Use of microlysimeters to measure evaporation from sandy soils. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 65(3–4), 159–173 (1993)
Grimmond, C.S.B., Isard, S.A., Belding, M.J.: Development and evaluation of continuously weighing mini-lysimeters. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 62(3–4), 205–218 (1992)
Brye, K.R., Norman, J.M., Bundy, L.G., Gower, S.T.: An equilibrium tension lysimeter for measuring drainage through soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63(3), 536–543 (1999)
Williams, D.G., Cable, W., Hultine, K., Hoedjes, J.C.B., Yepez, E.A., Simonneaux, V., Er-Raki, S., Boulet, G., De Bruin, H.A.R., Chehbouni, A., Hartogensis, O.K.: Evapotranspiration components determined by stable isotope, sap flow and eddy covariance techniques. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 125(3), 241–258 (2004)
Heilman, J.L., Ham, J.M.: Measurement of mass flow rate of sap in Ligustrum japonicum. HortScience 25(4), 465–467 (1990)
Van Dijk, A., Moene, A.F. De Bruin, H.A.R.: The principles of surface flux physics: theory, practice and description of the ECPACK library. Internal Report 2004/1, Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 99 pp. (2004)
Twine, T.E., Kustas, W.P., Norman, J.M., Cook, D.R., Houser, P.R., Meyers, T.P., Prueger, J.H., Starks, P.J., Wesely, M.L.: Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 103, 279–300 (2000)
Moore, C.J.: Frequency response corrections for eddy correlation systems. Bound. Layer Meteorol. 37, 17–35 (1986)
Scott, R.W.C., Garatuza-Payan, J., Edwards, E., Goodrich, D.C., Williams, D.G., Shuttleworth, W.J.: The understory and overstory partitioning of energy and water fluxes in an open canopy, semi-arid woodland. Agric. For. Meteorol. 114, 127–139 (2003)
Gerdes, G., Allison, B.E., Pereira, L.S.: Overestimation of soybean crop transpiration by sap flow measurements under field conditions in Central Portugal. Irrig. Sci. 14(3), 135–139 (1994)
Dynamax, Inc.: Dynagage Sap Flow Sensor: User Manual. Dynamax, Houston (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rafi, Z., Merlin, O., Le Dantec, V., Khabba, S., Er-Raki, S., Mordelet, P. (2020). Inter-comparison Between Different Techniques for Evapotranspiration Partitioning: Eddy Covariance-, Sap Flow-, Lysimeter- and FAO-Based Methods. In: El Moussati, A., Kpalma, K., Ghaouth Belkasmi, M., Saber, M., Guégan, S. (eds) Advances in Smart Technologies Applications and Case Studies. SmartICT 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53187-4_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53187-4_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53186-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53187-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)