Skip to main content

Social Engineering Defense Mechanisms: A Taxonomy and a Survey of Employees’ Awareness Level

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computing (SAI 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1228))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the information security chain, humans have become the weakest point, and social engineers take advantage of that fact by psychologically manipulating people to persuade them to disclose sensitive information or execute malicious acts. Social engineering security attacks can be severe and hard to detect. Therefore, to prevent such attacks, organizations and their employees should be aware of the defense mechanisms that can mitigate the risk of these attacks. To that end, the authors (1) developed a taxonomy of social engineering defense mechanisms and also (2) designed and distributed a survey to measure employees’ level of awareness of these mechanisms. To develop the taxonomy, the authors reviewed the related literature and extracted the main defense mechanisms. To measure employees’ level of awareness of social engineering defense mechanisms, the authors designed and distributed a survey in which 791 employees participated. Finally, after collecting and analyzing the data, the authors found that more than half of the surveyed employees are not aware of social engineering attacks and their defense mechanisms. Such a worrisome result shows that employees and organizations are extremely vulnerable to such attacks, and serious steps need to be taken to elevate the employees’ awareness level against these emerging security threats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Applegate, S.D.: Social engineering: hacking the wetware!. Inf. Secur. J. Global Perspect. 18(1), 40–46 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Hadnagy, C.: Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking. Wiley, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berg, A.: Cracking a social engineer. LAN Times (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greening, T.: Ask and ye shall receive: a study in “social engineering”. ACM SIGSAC Rev. 14(2), 8–14 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karakasiliotis, A., Furnell, S., Papadaki, M.: Assessing end-user awareness of social engineering and phishing (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Workman, M.: A test of interventions for security threats from social engineering. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 16(5), 463–483 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Orgill, G.L., Romney, G.W., Bailey, M.G., Orgill, P.M.: The urgency for effective user privacy-education to counter social engineering attacks on secure computer systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Information Technology Education, pp. 177–181. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bakhshi, T., Papadaki, M., Furnell, S.: A practical assessment of social engineering vulnerabilities. In: HAISA, pp. 12–23 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mouton, F., Malan, M.M., Leenen, L., Venter, H.S.: Social engineering attack framework. In: 2014 Information Security for South Africa, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Choi, M., Levy, Y., Hovav, A.: The role of user computer self-efficacy, cybersecurity countermeasures awareness, and cybersecurity skills influence on computer misuse. In: Proceedings of the Pre-international Conference of Information Systems (ICIS) SIGSEC – Workshop on Information Security and Privacy (WISP) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Granger, S.: Social engineering fundamentals, Part I: hacker tactics. Security Focus, 18 December 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krombholz, K., Hobel, H., Huber, M., Weippl, E.: Advanced social engineering attacks. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 22, 113–122 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manske, K.: An introduction to social engineering. Inf. Syst. Secur. 9(5), 1–7 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aldawood, H., Skinner, G.: An academic review of current industrial and commercial cyber security social engineering solutions. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cryptography, Security and Privacy, pp. 110–115. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alharthi, D.N., Hammad, M.M., Regan, A.C.: A taxonomy of social engineering defense mechanisms. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds.) Advances in Information and Communication (FICC 2020). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1130. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas, K., Li, F., Zand, A., Barrett, J., Ranieri, J., Invernizzi, L., Markov, Y., Comanescu, O., Eranti, V., Moscicki, A., et al.: Data breaches, phishing, or malware?: Understanding the risks of stolen credentials. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1421–1434. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shane, S., Schmidt, M.S.: Hillary Clinton emails take long path to controversy. The New York Times (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aviv, A.J., Gibson, K.L., Mossop, E., Blaze, M., Smith, J.M.: Smudge attacks on smartphone touch screens. Woot 10, 1–7 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thapar, A.: Social engineering: an attack vector most intricate to tackle. Infosec Writers, CISSP (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Verizon 2018. 2018 data breach investigations report (2018). https://www.documentwereld.nl/files/2018/Verizon-DBIR_2018-Main_report.pdf

  21. Elnaim, B.M.E., Al-Lami, H.A.S.W.: The current state of phishing attacks against Saudi Arabia University students (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Happ, C., Melzer, A., Steffgen, G.: Trick with treat-reciprocity increases the willingness to communicate personal data. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 372–377 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Medlin, B.D., Cazier, J.A., Foulk, D.P.: Analyzing the vulnerability of U.S. hospitals to social engineering attacks: how many of your employees would share their password? Int. J. Inf. Secur. Priv. (IJISP) 2(3), 71–83 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghafir, I., Prenosil, V., Alhejailan, A., Hammoudeh, M.: Social engineering attack strategies and defence approaches. In: 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), pp. 145–149. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chitrey, A., Singh, D., Singh, V.: A comprehensive study of social engineering based attacks in India to develop a conceptual model. Int. J. Inf. Netw. Secur. 1(2), 45 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Siadati, H., Nguyen, T., Gupta, P., Jakobsson, M., Memon, N.: Mind your SMSes: mitigating social engineering in second factor authentication. Comput. Secur. 65, 14–28 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta, M., Sharman, R.: Social network theoretic framework for organizational social engineering susceptibility index. In: AMCIS 2006 Proceedings, p. 408 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Parsons, K., Calic, D., Pattinson, M., Butavicius, M., McCormac, A., Zwaans, T.: The human aspects of information security questionnaire (HAIS-Q): two further validation studies. Comput. Secur. 66, 40–51 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Beuran, R., Chinen, K.-i., Tan, Y., Shinoda, Y.: Towards effective cybersecurity education and training (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Herath, T., Rao, H.R.: Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness. Decis. Support Syst. 47(2), 154–165 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stoner, J.A.: Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: the influence of widely held values. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 4(4), 442–459 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Okoli, C., Schabram, K.: A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. NCSC: National Cybersecurity Center. https://www.ncsc.gov.sa/. Accessed 2019

  34. SurveyMonkey Inc.: SurveyMonkey. https://www.surveymonkey.com/. Accessed 2019

  35. Bronk, C., Tikk-Ringas, E.: The cyber attack on Saudi Aramco. Survival 55(2), 81–96 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheong, D.D.: Cyberattacks in the Gulf: lessons for active defence (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Basamh, S.S., Qudaih, H., Ibrahim, J.B.: An overview on cyber security awareness in Muslim countries. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Res. 4, 21–24 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. ITU. Committed to connecting the world. https://www.itu.int/en/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalal N. Alharthi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alharthi, D.N., Regan, A.C. (2020). Social Engineering Defense Mechanisms: A Taxonomy and a Survey of Employees’ Awareness Level. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Intelligent Computing. SAI 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1228. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52249-0_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics