Abstract
This chapter considers the trend towards the trans-nationalization of political problems, focusing on two dimensions: the Europeanisation of debates inside the E.U. and the changes in the digitalized media ecosystem generating processes of inter-media agenda setting. The case-study analyses the public attention generated by two referenda: the UK Brexit referendum and the Italian constitutional reform referendum promoted by Matteo Renzi. Through the analysis of primary data, the research yields three main findings. It confirms the existence of political and media imperatives underlying the increasing sharing of agendas; it documents the limits of such sharing—obstructed, for example, by the tendency to domesticate issues—and it throws light on the logics characterizing the various national Twitterspheres.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162–178.
Baisnée, O. (2007). The European Public Sphere does not exist (At least it's worth wondering...). European Journal of Communication, 22(4), 493–503.
Ballmann, K. (2017). Brexit in the news—Frames and discourse in the transnational media representation of Brexit [Master thesis]. Stockholms Universitet: Department of Journalism, Media and Communication.
Bartholomé, G., Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. (2015). Manufacturing conflict? How journalists intervene in the conflict frame building process. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(4), 438–457.
Bijsmans, P., Galpin, C., & Leruth, B. (2018). ‘Brexit’ in transnational perspective: An analysis of newspapers in France, Germany and the Netherlands. Comparative European Politics, 16(5), 825–842.
Blei, D., & Lafferty, J. (2006). Correlated topic models. In Y. Weiss, B. Schölkopf, & J. Platt (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 18 (pp. 147–154). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Butler, D., & Ranney, A. (Eds.). (1994). Referendums around the world: The growing use of direct democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it… and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23.
Cammaerts, B., & Van Audenhove, L. (2005). Online political debate, unbounded citizenship, and the problematic nature of a transnational public sphere. Political Communication, 22(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933188.
Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93.
Ceccarini, L., & Bordignon, F. (2017). Referendum on Renzi: The 2016 vote on the Italian constitutional revision. South European Society and Politics, 22(3), 281–302.
Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalaby, J. K. (2005). From internationalization to transnationalization. Global Media and Communication, 1(1), 28–33.
Clausen, L. (2004). Localizing the global: “Domestication” processes in international news production. New Media and Society, 26(1), 25–44.
Curran, J., Esser, F., Hallin, D. C., Hayashi, K., & Lee, C. (2017). International news and global integration. Journalism Studies, 18(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1050056.
de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal and Document Design, 13(1), 51–62.
de Vreese, C. H. (2012). New avenues for framing research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 365–375.
Dekavalla, M. (2016). Framing referendum campaigns: The 2014 Scottish independence referendum in the press. Media, Culture and Society, 38(6), 793–810.
Di Maggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Fraser, N. (2007). Transnationalizing the public sphere on the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-westphalian world. Theory, Culture and Society, 24(4), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080090.
Guo, L., Holton, A., & Jeong, S. H. (2012). Transnational comparative framing: A model for an emerging framing approach. International Journal of Communication, 6, 1–24.
Hafez, K. (2007). The myth of media globalization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Hänska, M., & Bauchowitz, S. (2019). Can social media facilitate a European public sphere? Transnational communication and the Europeanization of Twitter during the Eurozone crisis. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1–14.
Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297–308.
Koopmans, R., & Erbe, J. (2004). Towards a European public sphere? Vertical and horizontal dimensions of Europe-anized political communication. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 17(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351161042000238643.
Koopmans, R., & Pfetsch, B. (2006). Obstacles or motors of Europeanization? German media and the transnationalization of public debate. Communications, 31(2), 115–138.
Kriesi, H., & Grande, E. (2016). The euro crisis: A boost to the politicisation of European integration?. In S. Hutter, E. Grande, H. Kriesi (Eds.), Politicising Europe (pp. 240–276). Cambridge University Press.
Krzyżanowski, M. (2019). Brexit and the imaginary of ‘crisis’: A discourse-conceptual analysis of European news media. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4), 465–490.
McLaren, L., Boomgaarden, H., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). News coverage and public concern about immigration in Britain. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(2), 173–193.
Meyer, C. O. (2005). The Europeanization of media discourse: A study of quality press coverage of economic policy co-ordination since Amsterdam. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(1), 121–148.
Mohr, J. W., & Bogdanov, P. (2013). Special issue title: Topic models and the cultural sciences. Poetics, 41(6), 545–569.
Neveu, E. (2015). Sociologie politique des problèmes publics. Paris: Armand Colin.
Newell, J. L. (2016). Standing on the edge of a precipice? Italy in the weeks before the referendum. Contemporary Italian Politics, 8(3), 221–223.
Oliver, T. (2016). European and international views of Brexit. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1321–1328.
Pasquino, G., & Valbruzzi, M. (2017). Italy says no: The 2016 constitutional referendum and its consequences. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 22(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2017.1286096.
Pfetsch, B., & Adam, S. (2011). Media agenda building in online and offline media—Comparing issues and countries [Conference presentation]. Proceedings of the 6th ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Pfetsch, B., Maier, D., Miltner, P., & Waldherr, A. (2016). Challenger networks of food policy on the Internet: A comparative study of structures and coalitions in Germany, the UK, the US, and Switzerland. International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP), 7(1), 16–36.
Risse, T., &Van de Steeg, M. (2003, June 20–22). An Emerging European Public Sphere? Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Clarifications [Conference presentation abstract]. Europeanization of Public Spheres, Political Mobilisation, Public Communication and the European Union, Science Center, Berlin, Germany.
Sayre, B., Bode, L., Shah, D., Wilcox, D., & Shah, C. (2010). Agenda setting in a digital age: Tracking attention to California Proposition 8 in social media, online news and conventional news. Policy & Internet, 2(2), 7–32.
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.
Statham, P., & Trenz, H. J. (2012). The politicization of Europe: Contesting the constitution in the mass media. London and New York: Routledge.
Uleri, P. V., & Gallagher, M. (Eds.). (1996). The referendum experience in Europe. Berlin: Springer.
Usherwood, S., & Wright, K. A. (2017). Sticks and stones: Comparing Twitter campaigning strategies in the European Union referendum. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2), 371–388.
Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2016). Political agenda setting by the mass media: Ten years of research, 2005–2015. Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting, 157–179.
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2008). The contingency of intermedia agenda setting: A longitudinal study in Belgium. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(4), 860–877.
Vonbun, R., Königslöw, K. K. V., & Schoenbach, K. (2016). Intermedia agenda-setting in a multimedia news environment. Journalism, 17(8), 1054–1073.
Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2007). The mass media’s political agenda-setting power: A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies, 41, 814–836.
Wessler, H., Peters, B., Brüggemann, M., Königslöw, K. K. V., & Sifft, S. (2008). Transnationalization of public spheres. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zucker, H. (1978). The variable nature of news media influence. Annals of the International Communication Association, 2(1), 225–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roncarolo, F., Bentivegna, S. (2020). Same Topics with Different Meanings? Social Networks and the Trans-Nationalization of Issues and Frames in European Public Policy Agendas. In: Neveu, E., Surdez, M. (eds) Globalizing Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52044-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52044-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52043-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52044-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)