Skip to main content

Technical Efficiency and Spatial Econometric Model: Application to Rice Production of Thailand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Behavioral Predictive Modeling in Economics

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 897))

  • 718 Accesses

Abstract

Bayesian statistics and the MCMC simulation applied to the spatial panel data is presented in this paper focusing on rice farming in Thailand. Rice is chosen because it can be grown in all geographic regions of the country as the main staple and for domestic market and export. The rice sector has been crucial in all facets of the Thai society and rice farmers have been regarded as the backbone of the country. However, there are some obstacles curbing the improvement of rice production and rice farming systems. This paper is conducted employing the panel time-series data to investigate the spatial effects on the productivity of rice farming in Thailand. Yearly panel time-series data obtained from 76 provinces of Thailand is used for this study which includes three sections: (1) The overview of rice production in Thailand, (2) Technical efficiency reports for regional rice farming areas, and (3) Spatial panel econometric investigation to arrive at some significant findings for making effective policy recommendations. The empirical results from this study can be useful for those with interest in political benefit and contribute to the body of knowledge necessary for further research in agricultural economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A rai is a unit of area which equals to 1,600 square meters (16 ares, 0.16 hectares, 0.3954 acres)

  2. 2.

    The standard instrument for the measurement of rainfall is the 203 mm (8 in.) rain gauge. This is essentially a circular funnel with a diameter of 203 mm which collects the rain into a graduated and calibrated cylinder. The measuring cylinder can record up to 25 mm of precipitation

References

  1. Abatania, L.N., Hailu, A., Mugera, A.W.: Analysis of farm household technical efficiency in Northern Ghana using bootstrap DEA. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, The Esplanade Hotel, Fremantle WA, 7–10 February 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anselin, L.: Spatial externalities. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 26(3), 147–152 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anselin, L.: Spatial econometrics: methods and models. In: Studies in Operational Regional Science, vol. 4, Springer, Dordrecht (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7799-1

  4. Balde, B.S., et al.: An analysis of technical efficiency of mangrove rice production in the Guinean Coastal Area. J. Agric. Sci. 6(8), 179–196 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaitip, P., Chaiboonsri, C., Inluang, F.: The production of Thailands sugarcane: using panel data envelopment analysis (panel DEA) based decision on bootstrapping method. Procedia Econ. Financ. 14, 120–127 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conley, T.G., Udry, C.R.: Learning about a new technology: pineapple in Ghana. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 35–69 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.: Improvements on cross-validation: the.632+ bootstrap method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 92(438), 548–560 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fare, R., Primont, D.: Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gebregziabher, G., Namara, R.E., Holden, S.: Technical efficiency of irrigated and Rain-Fed smallholder agriculture in Tigray, Ethiopia: a comparative stochastic frontier production function analysis. Q. J. Int. Agric. 51(3), 203–226 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumbhakar, S., Lovell, C.: Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Langyintuo, A.S., Mekuria, M.: Assessing the influence of neighborhood effects on the adoption of improved agricultural technologies in developing agriculture. Afr. J. Agric. Resource Econ. 2(2), 151–169 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, C.: CARBayes: an R package for Bayesian spatial modeling with conditional autoregressive priors. J. Stat. Softw. 55(13), 1–23 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leorato, S., Mezzetti, M.: Spatial panel data model with error dependence: a Bayesian separable covariance approach. Bayesian Anal. 11(4), 1035–1069 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. LeSage, J.P.: Software for Bayesian spatial model comparison. Rgion et Dveloppement 40, 11–23 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. LeSage, J.P.: Spatial econometric panel data model specification: a Bayesian approach. SSRN (2013). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2339124

  16. LeSage, J.P., Colin, V., Chih, Y.Y.: A Bayesian heterogeneous coefficients spatial autoregressive panel data model of retail fuel price rivalry. Ruhr Economic Papers, No. 617 (2016). ISBN 978-3-86788-717-5

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, K., Fang, L., Lu, T.: Bayesian panel smooth transition model with spatial correlation. PLoS ONE 14(3), 1–12 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Millo, G., Piras, G.: splm: Spatial panel data models in R. J. Stat. Soft. 47(1), 1–38 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maertens, A., Barrett, C.B.: Measuring social networks effects on agricultural technology adoption. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 95(2), 353–359 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ostrom, E.: Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14(3), 137–158 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tziogkidis, P.: Bootstrap DEA and hypothesis testing. Cardiff Economics Working Papers, No. E2012/18, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pede, V.O., McKinley, J., Singbo, A., Kajisa, K.: Spatial dependency of technical efficiency in rice farming: the case of bohol. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the 2015 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association and Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 26–28 July 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rejesus, R.M., Martin, A.M., Gypmantasiri, P.: Meta-impact assessment of the irrigated rice research consortium. IRRI Special Report, Los Banos, Philippines (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shantha, A., Asan Ali, B.G.H., Bandara, R.A.G.: Technical efficiency of paddy farming under major irrigation conditions in the dry-zone of Sri Lanka: a parametric approach. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 7(6), 104–112 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Suphannachart, W.: Spatial analysis of research-productivity nexus: a case of Thai rice sector. In: 2017 International Conference on Applied Economics (ICOAE). Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics (2017). ISBN 978-3-319-70055-7

    Google Scholar 

  26. Suphannachart, W., Warr, P.: Research and productivity in Thai agriculture. Aust. J. Agric. Resource Econ. 55, 35–52 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Simar, L., Wilson, W.P.: Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manag. Sci. 44(1), 49–61 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ward, P.S., Pede, V.O.: Capturing social network effects in technology adoption: the spatial diffusion of hybrid rice in Bangladesh. Aust. J. Agric. Resource Econ. 58, 1–17 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zheng, Y., Zhu, J., Li, D.: Analyzing spatial panel data of cigarette demand: a Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach. J. Data Sci. 6, 467–489 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thunyawadee Sucharidtham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A

Appendix A

Fig. 3
figure 3

The panel bar of rice productions (tons) in 76 provinces of Thailand

Fig. 4
figure 4

The panel bar of rice planting areas (Rai) in 76 provinces of Thailand

Fig. 5
figure 5

The panel bar of fertilizer usages (tons) in 76 provinces of Thailand

Fig. 6
figure 6

The panel bar of rice farmer families (units) in 76 provinces of Thailand

Fig. 7
figure 7

The panel bar of yearly rainfall measurement (mm.) in 76 provinces of Thailand

Fig. 8
figure 8

The scatter plots of bootstrapping efficiencies of rice productions assuming bias corrections in 76 provinces of Thailand

Fig. 9
figure 9

The scatter plots of bootstrapping efficiencies of rice productions assuming no bias corrections in 76 provinces of Thailand

Fig. 10
figure 10

The scatter plots of bootstrapping efficiencies of rice productions with modified bias corrections in 76 provinces of Thailand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sucharidtham, T., Wannapan, S. (2021). Technical Efficiency and Spatial Econometric Model: Application to Rice Production of Thailand. In: Sriboonchitta, S., Kreinovich, V., Yamaka, W. (eds) Behavioral Predictive Modeling in Economics. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 897. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49728-6_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics