Skip to main content

Incarcerated Hiatal Hernia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thoracic Surgery for the Acute Care Surgeon

Part of the book series: Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma ((HTACST))

Abstract

Primary paraesophageal hernia is a distinct anatomical and clinical entity that leads to incarceration and volvulus of the stomach in the chest. Because of the volume of herniated abdominal contents, large hiatal defect, and frail crura, the optimal repair requires both axial and radial tension vectors to be addressed. A large incarcerated hiatal hernia may also occur after failed antireflux repairs or esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction and can lead to outlet obstruction and strangulation. In the absence of prohibitive surgical risk factors, all symptomatic patients should undergo elective laparoscopic repair to prevent severe complications, and even mortality, which can occur should an urgent surgical procedure become necessary. Extended transmediastinal dissection with complete sac excision is mandatory to release axial tension and to reduce at least 3 cm of distal esophagus into the abdomen. Posterior suture crural repair with a biosynthetic mesh patch onlay has the potential to reduce short-term recurrence rates. A Collis gastroplasty may be added with a short esophagus in order to further reduce axial tension. Whenever feasible, a partial fundoplication should be performed after repair of the crura to decrease the risk of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux. In emergency situations, resuscitation and decompression of the intrathoracic stomach is the first priority. Partial gastric or bowel resections may be required because of intraoperative findings of ischemia and/or perforation. In such circumstances, anterior gastropexy may be a reasonable alternative to hiatal repair to prevent recurrent hernia and minimize morbidity. Recurrent incarcerated hernia and para-conduit postesophagectomy hiatal hernia pose additional technical challenges and increase both complication and mortality rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Skinner D, Belsey R. Management of esophageal disease. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastrenterol. 2008;22:601–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DeMeester T, Bonavina L. Paraesophageal hiatal hernia. In: Nyhus L, Condon R, editors. Hernia. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1989. p. 684–93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wo J, Branum J, Hunter J, et al. Clinical features of type III (mixed) paraesophageal hernia. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:914–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill LD. Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia. A surgical emergency. Am J Surg. 1973;126:286–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matthews J, Bhanderi S, Mitchell H, et al. Diaphragmatic herniation following esophagogastric resectional surgery: an increasing problem with minimally invasive techniques? Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5419–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenkman HJF, Parry K, Noble F, et al. Hiatal hernia after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1055–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Milito P, Lombardi M, Asti E, et al. Influence of large hiatus hernia on cardiac volumes. A prospective observational cohort study by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Int J Cardiol. 2018;268:241–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sihvo EI, Salo JA, Rasanen JV, Rantanen TK. Fatal complications of adult paraesophageal hernia: a population-based study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:419–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Allaix ME, Patti MG. Paraesophageal hernia repair in the USA: trends of utilization stratified by surgical volume and consequent impact on perioperative outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21:1199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sorial RK, Ali M, Kaneva P, et al. Modern era surgical outcomes of elective and emergent giant paraesophageal hernia repair at a high-volume referral center. Surg Endosc. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06764-4. Epub ahead of print.

  12. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle G, Rattner D. Paraesophageal hernias:operation or observation? Ann Surg. 2002;236:492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley DD, Louie BE, Farivar AS, et al. Assessment and reduction of diaphragmatic tension during hiatal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:796–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tam V, Winger DG, Nason KS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh versus suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2016;211:226–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bawahab M, Mitchell P, Church N, Debru E. Management of acute paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:255–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Edye M, Salky B, Posner A, Fierer A. Sac excision is essential to adequate laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1259–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Terry ML, Vernon A, Hunter JG. Stapled-wedge Collis gastroplasty for the shortened esophagus. Am J Surg. 2004;188:195–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Asti E, Lovece A, Bonavina L, et al. Laparoscopic management of large hiatus hernia: five-year cohort study and comparison of mesh-augmented versus standard crura repair. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5404–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsang TK, Walker R, Yu DJ. Endoscopic reduction of gastric volvulus: the alpha-loop maneuver. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:244–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Ponsky JL, et al. Minimally invasive management of paraesophageal herniation in the high-risk surgical patient. Am J Surg. 2001;182:510–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Light D, Links D, Griffin M. The threatened stomach: management of the acute gastric volvulus. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1847–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Bonavina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bonavina, L., Inaba, K. (2021). Incarcerated Hiatal Hernia. In: Galante, J.M., Coimbra, R. (eds) Thoracic Surgery for the Acute Care Surgeon. Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48493-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48493-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48492-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48493-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics