Skip to main content

The Use of Short and Ultrashort Implants in Atrophic Jaws

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Short Implants

Abstract

Tooth loss results in resorption of the alveolar bone, often down to cortical bone. The amount and rapidity of resorption varies from patient to patient but eventually all alveolar and cancellous bone will resorb. Over 150 years ago, Julius Wolff, an anatomist and surgeon, observed that healthy bone adapts to loads to which it is exposed [1, 2]. He described the trabecular structures in the proximal femur based upon the load being placed on the bone [3]. Applying Wolff’s law to the resorption of the jaws’ bone is a logical consequence of tooth loss. Without the presence of a load being placed on the teeth, the mandible and maxilla will resorb.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wolff J. The law of bone remodeling. Berlin: Springer; 1986 (translation of the German 1892 edition).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frost HM. Wolff’s law and bone’s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 1994;64(3):175–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolff J. The classic: on the inner architecture of bones and its importance for bone growth. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(4):1056–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atwood DA. Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagittal sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent. 1963;13:810–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atwood DA. Reduction of residual ridges: a major oral disease entity. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;17:747–54.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cawood JL, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17:232–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tatum H. Lecture presented to the Alabama Implant Congress 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tatum H. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstruction. Dent Clin N Am. 1986;30(2):207–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38(8):613–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buser D, Brägger U, Lang NP, Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990;1(1):22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Watzinger F, Ewers R, Millesi W, Kirsch A, Glaser C, Ackerman KL. Horseshoe LeFort I osteotomy in conjunction with endosteal implants—a medium term follow up study. Int Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1966;25(6):424–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ewers R. Maxilla sinus grafting with marine algae derived bone forming material: a clinical report of long term results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(12):1712–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malevez C, Daeleman P, Adriaenssens P, Durdu F. Use of zygomatic implants to deal with resorbed posterior maxillae. Periodontology. 2000;33(1):82–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. ‘All-on-Four’ immediate-function concept with Brånemark system implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5:2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Summers R. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15(2):152–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bairdi H, Schulte J, Kovacs A, Weed M, Chuang SK. Crown-to-implant ratio of short length implants. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36:425–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Atieh MA, Zadeh H, Atanford C, Cooper L. Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:1323–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hadzik J, Krawiec M, Slawecki K, Kunert-Keil C, Dominak M, Gedrange T. The influence of the crown-implant ratio on the crestal bone level and implant secondary stability—36 month clinical study. BioMed Res Int. 2018; Article ID 4246874.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bevilacqua M, Tealdo T, Pera F, Menini M, Mossolov A, Drago C, Pera P. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(6):539–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer K, Stenberg T. Three year data from a randomized, controlled study of early loading of single stage dental implants supporting maxillary full arch prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(2):245–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heydecke G, Zwahlen M, Nicol H, Nisand D, et al. What is the optimal number of implants for fixed reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):217–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lehrberg J, Coehlo P. Biologic response to dental implants. In: Morgan V, editor. The Bicon short implant. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2017. p. 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wagner F, Seemann R, Marincola M, Ewers R. Fixed, fiber-reinforced resin fixed prostheses on four short implants in severely atrophic maxillas: 1-year results of a prospective cohort study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(6):1194–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

  24. Seemann R, Wagner F, Marincola M, Ewers R. Fixed, fiber-reinforced resin bridges on 5.0-mm implants in severely atrophic mandibles: Up to 5 years’ follow-up of a prospective cohort study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017. pii: S0278–2391(17)31465–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.11.043.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Ewers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ewers, R., Tomasetti, B.J., Morgan, V.J., Perpetuini, A. (2020). The Use of Short and Ultrashort Implants in Atrophic Jaws. In: Tomasetti, B., Ewers, R. (eds) Short Implants. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44199-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44199-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44198-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44199-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics