Skip to main content

Ethical Dimensions of Male Infertility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Male Infertility

Abstract

Ethical dilemmas are commonplace in male infertility and reproductive medicine. Core bioethical principles frame the way health providers think about and address such ethical dilemmas in male fertility issues and across the spectrum of medicine. This chapter serves to define the bioethical principles that should guide our decision-making. Furthermore, these ethical principles are applied to some of the most common ethical issues encountered in male infertility today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beauchamp TL. Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics. 2003;29:269–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:902–11. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0801454.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheth KR, et al. Improved fertility preservation care for male patients with cancer after establishment of formalized oncofertility program. J Urol. 2012;187:979–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz LI, Jeha S. Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1880–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.07.175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Posthumous reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(Suppl 1):S260–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson JA. Posthumous reproduction. Indiana Law J. 1994;69:1027–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahadur G. Death and conception. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2769–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Oocyte or embryo donation to women of advanced reproductive age: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:e3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhnert B, Nieschlag E. Reproductive functions of the ageing male. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:327–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmh030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bray I, Gunnell D, Davey Smith G. Advanced paternal age: how old is too old? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:851–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.045179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Slama R, et al. Influence of paternal age on the risk of spontaneous abortion. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:816–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reichenberg A, Gross R, Sandin S, Susser ES. Advancing paternal and maternal age are both important for autism risk. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:772–3. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.187708.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Malaspina D. Paternal factors and schizophrenia risk: de novo mutations and imprinting. Schizophr Bull. 2001;27:379–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Steinbock B. Reproductive rights and responsibilities. Hast Cent Rep. 1994;24:15–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Access to fertility services by transgender persons: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1111–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. White T. Risk and protective factors for children whose parents are undergoing a gender transition. J Gay Lesbian Psychother. 2008;8:129–45.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lemos EV, Zhang D, Van Voorhis BJ, Hu XH. Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:586.e1–586.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chambers GM, Sullivan EA, Ishihara O, Chapman MG, Adamson GD. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Crawford S, et al. Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:444–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boyle KE, et al. Sperm harvesting and cryopreservation during vasectomy reversal is not cost effective. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:961–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence C. Jenkins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Asafu-Adjei, D.A., Jenkins, L.C. (2020). Ethical Dimensions of Male Infertility. In: Parekattil, S., Esteves, S., Agarwal, A. (eds) Male Infertility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32300-4_67

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32300-4_67

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32299-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32300-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics