Skip to main content

Measurement Challenge: Specification and Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality Assured Measurement

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Measurement Science and Technology ((SSMST))

  • 298 Accesses

Abstract

‘Measurement is not an end in itself …’ might seem to be a paradoxical way of introducing a book about measurement. But measurement is important to the majority since it gives objective evidence on which to base decisions. The need for quality-assured measurement has evolved and widened over the centuries. Quality-assured measurement remains a topic of burgeoning and increasingly multidisciplinary interest.

This book will deliberately not follow the many exposés already in the literature which set the subject of measurement in a historical context, however evocative that may be. In-depth accounts of how the ancient Egyptians or bold navigators struggled when pioneering quality-assured measurement will be mostly left to others to present.

There is a need and a challenge to formulate a unified view of measurement. To this end, most of this first chapter of the book—as well as the last—will paradoxically not deal directly with measurement, but rather the objects—products, services, concepts, etc. and their characteristics—which are the concern of many people, who then ask metrologists to measure them. The first and last chapters thus provide object-related ‘bookends’—supporting a description of quality-assured measurement which is the central issue.

Presenting measurement in relation to objects will allow measurements to be anchored in relevance and interest for third parties. As it turns out, the approach also provides the key to a unified presentation about quality-assured measurement across social and physical sciences where objects are probed by man as a measurement instrument.

This chapter, as for most chapters in the book, concludes with templates provided for the reader to complete the corresponding sections of the measurement task for their chosen case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wherever possible, use will be made of the international vocabulary for conformity assessment in choice of terminology—see Sect. 1.4.

  2. 2.

    We will use a separate notation for the measurement space—see Chap. 2

References

  • A. Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis, 3rd edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2013). ISBN 978-0-470-46363-5

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • H. Ahn, Effect modeling of count data using logistic regression with qualitative predictors. Engineering 6, 758–772 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2014.612074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Akkerhuis, J. de Mast, T. Erdmann, The statistical evaluation of binary test without gold standard: robustness of latent variable approaches. Measurement 95, 473–479 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.10.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Dagman, R. Emardson, S. Kanerva, L.R. Pendrill, A. Farbrot, S. Abbas, A. Nihlstrand, Defining comfort for heavily-incontinent patients assisted by absorbent products in several contexts, in Innovating for Continence Meeting, Chicago, IL, 12–13 April 2013, (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • F. de Battisti, G. Nicolini, S. Salini, The Rasch Model in customer satisfaction survey data. Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag. 7, 15–13 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.E. Deming, Out of the Crisis (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, MA, 1986). ISBN 0911379010. OCLC 13126265

    Google Scholar 

  • E. den Ouden, Y. Lu, P.J.M. Sonnemans, A.C. Brombacher, Quality and reliability problems from a consumer perspective: an increasing problem overlooked by businesses? Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 22, 821–838 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Donabedian, The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA. 260(12), 1743–1748 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Ellison, T. Fearn, Characterising the performance of qualitative analytical methods: statistics and terminology. TRAC-Trend Anal. Chem. 24(6), 468–476 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EN 15224:2012 Health Care Services—Quality Management Systems—Requirements Based on EN ISO 9001:2008

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission 2019 CE Marking, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/ce-marking_en

  • R. Feynman, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume I (2013), http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_01.html#Ch1-S1

  • L. Finkelstein, Widely-defined measurement – an analysis of challenges. Measurement 42, 1270–1277 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Hardcastle, Qualitative Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 10576-1 “Statistical Methods – Guidelines for the Evaluation of Conformity with Specified Requirements”, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 2018, What is Conformity Assessment? https://www.iso.org/conformity-assessment.html

  • ISO 3534-2:2006, Statistics - Vocabulary and Symbols - Part 2: Applied statistics, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems — Requirements, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9001:ed-5:v1:en

  • ISO 9241-11:1998. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals. Website. www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=16883 Accessed 18 May 2017

  • ISO 9241-11:2018. Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts, https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html

  • ISO/IEC 17000:2004, Conformity Assessment – General Vocabulary, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/TS 20282-2:2013. IDT Usability of Consumer Products for Public Use – Part 2: Summative Test Method. Website. www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=62733 Accessed 18 May 2017

  • JCGM 200:2012 International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM 3rd edition) (JCGM 200:2008 with minor corrections) WG2 Joint Committee on Guides in Metrology (JCGM) (Sevrès: BIPM)

    Google Scholar 

  • A.M. Joglekar, Statistical Methods for Six Sigma in R&D and Manufacturing (Wiley, Hoboken, 2003). ISBN: 0-471-20342-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • L. F. M. Kuijt-Evers, Comfort in Using Hand Tools: Theory, Design and Evaluation (2006), ISBN-10: 90-5986-218-X, ISBN-13: 978-90-5986-218-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexiles, Lexile Framework for Reading (2018), https://lexile.com/

  • L. Mari, A. Maul, D.T. Irribarra, M. Wilson, Quantities, quantification, and the necessary and sufficient conditions for measurement. Measurement 100, 115–121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.12.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. McGrane, Stevens’ forgotten crossroads: the divergent measurement traditions in the physical and psychological sciences from the mid-twentieth century. Front. Psychol. Hypothesis Theory 6, 1–8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00431. art. 431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Mencattini, L. Mari, A conceptual framework for concept definition in measurement: the case of ‘sensitivity’. Measurement 72, 77–87 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (Wiley, Hoboken, 1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • R. Nelson, Physics envy: get over it. Iss. Sci. Technol. 31, 71–78 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Nilsson, Private Communication (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Nordin, R. Dybkaer, U. Forsum, X. Fuentes-Arderiu, F. Pontet, Vocabulary on nominal property, examination, and related concepts for clinical laboratory sciences (IFCC-IUPAC Recommendations 2017). Pure Appl. Chem. 90(5), 913–935 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2011-0613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OIML, “Quantity of product in prepackages”, International Recommendation OIML R 87 Edition 2016 (E), (2016), https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_r/r087-e16.pdf

  • L.R. Pendrill, Assuring measurement quality in person-centred healthcare. Meas. Sci. Technol 29(3), 034003 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aa9cd2

  • L.R. Pendrill, Operating ‘cost’ characteristics in sampling by variable and attribute. Accred. Qual. Assur. 13, 619–631 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L.R. Pendrill, Risk assessment and decision-making risk assessment and decision-making, in Theory and Methods of Measurements with Persons, ed. by B. Berglund, G. B. Rossi, J. Townsend, L. R. Pendrill, (Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, 2010). ISBN: 978-1-84872-939-1

    Google Scholar 

  • L.R. Pendrill, El ser humano como instrument de medida. e-medida (2014a)

    Google Scholar 

  • L.R. Pendrill, Man as a measurement instrument. NCSLI Meas. J. Meas. Sci. 9, 24–35 (2014b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L.R. Pendrill, Using measurement uncertainty in decision-making & conformity assessment. Metrologia 51, S206 (2014c)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • G. Rasch, On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology, in Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1961), pp. 321–334

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Rice, L.R. Pendrill, N. Petersson, J. Nordlinder, A. Farbrot, Rationale and design of a novel method to assess the usability of body-worn absorbent incontinence care products by caregivers. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 45, 456–464 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000462. open access

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.S. Roberts, Measurement theory with applications to decision-making, utility, and the social sciences, in Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 7, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985). ISBN 978-0-521-30227-2

    Google Scholar 

  • G.B. Rossi, F. Crenna, “Toward a formal theory of the measuring system”, IMEKO 2016 TC1-TC7-TC13. J. Phys. Conference Series 772, 012010 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/772/1/012010

  • K. Sawyer, H. Sankey, R. Lombardo, Over-measurement. Measurement 93, 379–384 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.A. Shewhart, [1939]. Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control (Dover, New York, 1986). ISBN 0486652327. OCLC 13822053. Reprint. Originally published: Washington, DC: Graduate School of the Department of Agriculture, 1939

    Google Scholar 

  • L Skedung, L.R. Pendrill et al., Evaluation of sensory properties of skin creams using Rasch transformation, in 11th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Göteborg, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Stenner, M. Smith, Testing construct theories. Percept. Mot. Skills 55, 415–426 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1982.55.2.415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Svensson, Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires. J. Rehabil. Med. 33, 47–48 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • wD.A. Swyt, Challenges to NIST in Dimensional Metrology: The Impact of Tightening Tolerances in the U.S. Discrete Part Manufacturing Industry, NISTIR 4757, Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Tezza, A.C. Bornia, S.F. de Andrade, Measuring web usability using item response theory: principles, features and opportunities. Interact Comp. 23, 67–175 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Viseu, Integration of social science into research is crucial. Nature 525, 291 (2015). http://www.nature.com/news/integration-of-social-science-into-research-is-crucial-1.18355

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • T. Vosk, Measurement uncertainty: requirement for admission of forensic science evidence, in Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science, ed. by A. Jamieson, A. A. Moenssens, (Wiley, Chichester, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061589.fsa1098

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • J. Weller et al., Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: a Rasch analysis approach. J. Behav. Decis. Making 26(2), 198–212 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Wilson et al., A comparison of measurement concepts across physical science and social science domains: instrument design, calibration, and measurement. J. Phys. Conf. Series 588, 012034 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Yang, W. Qiu, A measure of risk and a decision-making model based on expected utility and entropy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164, 792–799 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Exercise 1: The Product

Exercise 1: The Product

1.1.1 E1.1 Describe the Product

 

Your answers………………………………………

Please attach a specification sheet or similar about the product

 

What is the product used for?

 

Is the product part of a composite product?

 

Are you the producer, supplier or user of the product?

 

What is essential when choosing a certain product?

 

Why is this product so much ‘better’ than the others?

 

Is it better because of product development and/or increased demands from a particular application?

 

Which properties of the product are important?

 

What are the more important functions of the product?

 

Is it easy to understand how the product works?

 

Are certain functions or properties of the product regulated because of safety or similar reasons?

 

Specify the different costs for the product:

 

 What does it cost to make/use the product?

 

 Product price

 

 How much does it cost to use/maintain the product?

 

What will be the consequences if the product does not work correctly?

 

Can a value be assigned to the consequence costs?

 

Other questions:

 

1.1.2 E1.2 Product Demands

 

Your answers…………………………………………

What are the ‘optimal’ values of the product’s most important characteristics?

 

How large deviations from these optimum values can be tolerated?

 

How much will your costs vary with varying deviations in product characteristics?

 

Other demands:

 

1.1.3 E1.3 Definition of Test of Product, Based on Product Description §E1.1

 

Your answers…………………………………………

A. Test of non-functional characteristics of product/system. Is the product ‘correctly’ made?—Describe the test

 

 – Describe scope of product test (entity, characteristic, test range)

 

 – Describe environmental tests on product

 

 – How much does each product test cost?

 

B. Test of product/system function. Is the product right—Describe the test:

 

 – Describe scope of product test (entity, characteristic, test range)

 

 – Describe test of ‘hard’ and/or ‘soft’ functions of product

 

 – Describe environmental tests on product

 

 – Describe possible safety tests of product

 

 – How much does each product test cost?

 

C. Initial verification of product—Describe the test:

 

 – Choose verifications module (A–H)

 

D. Subsequent verification of product—Describe the test:

 

Others:

 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pendrill, L. (2019). Measurement Challenge: Specification and Design. In: Quality Assured Measurement. Springer Series in Measurement Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28695-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics