Abstract
‘Measurement is not an end in itself …’ might seem to be a paradoxical way of introducing a book about measurement. But measurement is important to the majority since it gives objective evidence on which to base decisions. The need for quality-assured measurement has evolved and widened over the centuries. Quality-assured measurement remains a topic of burgeoning and increasingly multidisciplinary interest.
This book will deliberately not follow the many exposés already in the literature which set the subject of measurement in a historical context, however evocative that may be. In-depth accounts of how the ancient Egyptians or bold navigators struggled when pioneering quality-assured measurement will be mostly left to others to present.
There is a need and a challenge to formulate a unified view of measurement. To this end, most of this first chapter of the book—as well as the last—will paradoxically not deal directly with measurement, but rather the objects—products, services, concepts, etc. and their characteristics—which are the concern of many people, who then ask metrologists to measure them. The first and last chapters thus provide object-related ‘bookends’—supporting a description of quality-assured measurement which is the central issue.
Presenting measurement in relation to objects will allow measurements to be anchored in relevance and interest for third parties. As it turns out, the approach also provides the key to a unified presentation about quality-assured measurement across social and physical sciences where objects are probed by man as a measurement instrument.
This chapter, as for most chapters in the book, concludes with templates provided for the reader to complete the corresponding sections of the measurement task for their chosen case.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A. Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis, 3rd edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2013). ISBN 978-0-470-46363-5
H. Ahn, Effect modeling of count data using logistic regression with qualitative predictors. Engineering 6, 758–772 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2014.612074
T. Akkerhuis, J. de Mast, T. Erdmann, The statistical evaluation of binary test without gold standard: robustness of latent variable approaches. Measurement 95, 473–479 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.10.043
J. Dagman, R. Emardson, S. Kanerva, L.R. Pendrill, A. Farbrot, S. Abbas, A. Nihlstrand, Defining comfort for heavily-incontinent patients assisted by absorbent products in several contexts, in Innovating for Continence Meeting, Chicago, IL, 12–13 April 2013, (2013)
F. de Battisti, G. Nicolini, S. Salini, The Rasch Model in customer satisfaction survey data. Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag. 7, 15–13 (2010)
W.E. Deming, Out of the Crisis (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, MA, 1986). ISBN 0911379010. OCLC 13126265
E. den Ouden, Y. Lu, P.J.M. Sonnemans, A.C. Brombacher, Quality and reliability problems from a consumer perspective: an increasing problem overlooked by businesses? Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 22, 821–838 (2006)
A. Donabedian, The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA. 260(12), 1743–1748 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
S. Ellison, T. Fearn, Characterising the performance of qualitative analytical methods: statistics and terminology. TRAC-Trend Anal. Chem. 24(6), 468–476 (2005)
EN 15224:2012 Health Care Services—Quality Management Systems—Requirements Based on EN ISO 9001:2008
EU Commission 2019 CE Marking, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/ce-marking_en
R. Feynman, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume I (2013), http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_01.html#Ch1-S1
L. Finkelstein, Widely-defined measurement – an analysis of challenges. Measurement 42, 1270–1277 (2009)
W. Hardcastle, Qualitative Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1998)
ISO 10576-1 “Statistical Methods – Guidelines for the Evaluation of Conformity with Specified Requirements”, 2003
ISO 2018, What is Conformity Assessment? https://www.iso.org/conformity-assessment.html
ISO 3534-2:2006, Statistics - Vocabulary and Symbols - Part 2: Applied statistics, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems — Requirements, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9001:ed-5:v1:en
ISO 9241-11:1998. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals. Website. www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=16883 Accessed 18 May 2017
ISO 9241-11:2018. Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts, https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html
ISO/IEC 17000:2004, Conformity Assessment – General Vocabulary, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
ISO/TS 20282-2:2013. IDT Usability of Consumer Products for Public Use – Part 2: Summative Test Method. Website. www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=62733 Accessed 18 May 2017
JCGM 200:2012 International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM 3rd edition) (JCGM 200:2008 with minor corrections) WG2 Joint Committee on Guides in Metrology (JCGM) (Sevrès: BIPM)
A.M. Joglekar, Statistical Methods for Six Sigma in R&D and Manufacturing (Wiley, Hoboken, 2003). ISBN: 0-471-20342-4
L. F. M. Kuijt-Evers, Comfort in Using Hand Tools: Theory, Design and Evaluation (2006), ISBN-10: 90-5986-218-X, ISBN-13: 978-90-5986-218-X
Lexiles, Lexile Framework for Reading (2018), https://lexile.com/
L. Mari, A. Maul, D.T. Irribarra, M. Wilson, Quantities, quantification, and the necessary and sufficient conditions for measurement. Measurement 100, 115–121 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.12.050
J. McGrane, Stevens’ forgotten crossroads: the divergent measurement traditions in the physical and psychological sciences from the mid-twentieth century. Front. Psychol. Hypothesis Theory 6, 1–8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00431. art. 431
A. Mencattini, L. Mari, A conceptual framework for concept definition in measurement: the case of ‘sensitivity’. Measurement 72, 77–87 (2015)
D.C. Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (Wiley, Hoboken, 1996)
R. Nelson, Physics envy: get over it. Iss. Sci. Technol. 31, 71–78 (2015)
G. Nilsson, Private Communication (1995)
G. Nordin, R. Dybkaer, U. Forsum, X. Fuentes-Arderiu, F. Pontet, Vocabulary on nominal property, examination, and related concepts for clinical laboratory sciences (IFCC-IUPAC Recommendations 2017). Pure Appl. Chem. 90(5), 913–935 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2011-0613
OIML, “Quantity of product in prepackages”, International Recommendation OIML R 87 Edition 2016 (E), (2016), https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_r/r087-e16.pdf
L.R. Pendrill, Assuring measurement quality in person-centred healthcare. Meas. Sci. Technol 29(3), 034003 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aa9cd2
L.R. Pendrill, Operating ‘cost’ characteristics in sampling by variable and attribute. Accred. Qual. Assur. 13, 619–631 (2008)
L.R. Pendrill, Risk assessment and decision-making risk assessment and decision-making, in Theory and Methods of Measurements with Persons, ed. by B. Berglund, G. B. Rossi, J. Townsend, L. R. Pendrill, (Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, 2010). ISBN: 978-1-84872-939-1
L.R. Pendrill, El ser humano como instrument de medida. e-medida (2014a)
L.R. Pendrill, Man as a measurement instrument. NCSLI Meas. J. Meas. Sci. 9, 24–35 (2014b)
L.R. Pendrill, Using measurement uncertainty in decision-making & conformity assessment. Metrologia 51, S206 (2014c)
G. Rasch, On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology, in Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1961), pp. 321–334
S. Rice, L.R. Pendrill, N. Petersson, J. Nordlinder, A. Farbrot, Rationale and design of a novel method to assess the usability of body-worn absorbent incontinence care products by caregivers. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 45, 456–464 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000462. open access
F.S. Roberts, Measurement theory with applications to decision-making, utility, and the social sciences, in Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 7, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985). ISBN 978-0-521-30227-2
G.B. Rossi, F. Crenna, “Toward a formal theory of the measuring system”, IMEKO 2016 TC1-TC7-TC13. J. Phys. Conference Series 772, 012010 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/772/1/012010
K. Sawyer, H. Sankey, R. Lombardo, Over-measurement. Measurement 93, 379–384 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.034
W.A. Shewhart, [1939]. Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control (Dover, New York, 1986). ISBN 0486652327. OCLC 13822053. Reprint. Originally published: Washington, DC: Graduate School of the Department of Agriculture, 1939
L Skedung, L.R. Pendrill et al., Evaluation of sensory properties of skin creams using Rasch transformation, in 11th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Göteborg, 2015
J. Stenner, M. Smith, Testing construct theories. Percept. Mot. Skills 55, 415–426 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1982.55.2.415
E. Svensson, Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires. J. Rehabil. Med. 33, 47–48 (2001)
wD.A. Swyt, Challenges to NIST in Dimensional Metrology: The Impact of Tightening Tolerances in the U.S. Discrete Part Manufacturing Industry, NISTIR 4757, Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. (1992)
R. Tezza, A.C. Bornia, S.F. de Andrade, Measuring web usability using item response theory: principles, features and opportunities. Interact Comp. 23, 67–175 (2011)
A. Viseu, Integration of social science into research is crucial. Nature 525, 291 (2015). http://www.nature.com/news/integration-of-social-science-into-research-is-crucial-1.18355
T. Vosk, Measurement uncertainty: requirement for admission of forensic science evidence, in Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science, ed. by A. Jamieson, A. A. Moenssens, (Wiley, Chichester, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061589.fsa1098
J. Weller et al., Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: a Rasch analysis approach. J. Behav. Decis. Making 26(2), 198–212 (2013)
M. Wilson et al., A comparison of measurement concepts across physical science and social science domains: instrument design, calibration, and measurement. J. Phys. Conf. Series 588, 012034 (2015)
J. Yang, W. Qiu, A measure of risk and a decision-making model based on expected utility and entropy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164, 792–799 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Exercise 1: The Product
Exercise 1: The Product
1.1.1 E1.1 Describe the Product
Your answers……………………………………… | |
---|---|
Please attach a specification sheet or similar about the product | |
What is the product used for? | |
Is the product part of a composite product? | |
Are you the producer, supplier or user of the product? | |
What is essential when choosing a certain product? | |
Why is this product so much ‘better’ than the others? | |
Is it better because of product development and/or increased demands from a particular application? | |
Which properties of the product are important? | |
What are the more important functions of the product? | |
Is it easy to understand how the product works? | |
Are certain functions or properties of the product regulated because of safety or similar reasons? | |
Specify the different costs for the product: | |
What does it cost to make/use the product? | |
Product price | |
How much does it cost to use/maintain the product? | |
What will be the consequences if the product does not work correctly? | |
Can a value be assigned to the consequence costs? | |
Other questions: |
1.1.2 E1.2 Product Demands
Your answers………………………………………… | |
---|---|
What are the ‘optimal’ values of the product’s most important characteristics? | |
How large deviations from these optimum values can be tolerated? | |
How much will your costs vary with varying deviations in product characteristics? | |
Other demands: |
1.1.3 E1.3 Definition of Test of Product, Based on Product Description §E1.1
Your answers………………………………………… | |
---|---|
A. Test of non-functional characteristics of product/system. Is the product ‘correctly’ made?—Describe the test | |
– Describe scope of product test (entity, characteristic, test range) | |
– Describe environmental tests on product | |
– How much does each product test cost? | |
B. Test of product/system function. Is the product right—Describe the test: | |
– Describe scope of product test (entity, characteristic, test range) | |
– Describe test of ‘hard’ and/or ‘soft’ functions of product | |
– Describe environmental tests on product | |
– Describe possible safety tests of product | |
– How much does each product test cost? | |
C. Initial verification of product—Describe the test: | |
– Choose verifications module (A–H) | |
D. Subsequent verification of product—Describe the test: | |
Others: |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pendrill, L. (2019). Measurement Challenge: Specification and Design. In: Quality Assured Measurement. Springer Series in Measurement Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28695-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28695-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28694-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28695-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)