Skip to main content

Human Factors Evaluation of ATC Operational Procedures in Relation to Use of 3D Display

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors of Transportation (AHFE 2019)

Abstract

In this paper, Holding Stack Management (HSM), Continuous Climb Operations (CCO), Continuous Descent Operations (CDO), and Trajectory Based Operations (TBO) procedures are assessed in relation to the use of an additional 3D display. Two display seetings are compared, namely 2D+3D and 2D only. Twelve Air Traffic Control Officers (ATCOs) took part in the experiment. Traditional questionnaires such as NASA TLX, TRUST, etc. were given at the end of each 30-minute trial for each display setting. Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded during the experiments to continuously monitor the changes of the brain states of the ATCOs. The results of the data analyses show that by using 2D+3D display setting, more positive emotions, but higher stress and workload levels were experienced by ATCOs in TBO, CCO and CDO procedures than in 2D setting. In HSM, reduced stress and significantly lower cognitive workload were experienced by ATCOs when they were using 2D+3D setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lapin, K., Čyras, V., Savičienė, L.: Visualization of aircraft approach and departure procedures in a decision support system for controllers. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prevot, T., et al.: Toward automated air traffic control—investigating a fundamental paradigm shift in human/systems interaction. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 28(2), 77–98 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Erzberger, H.: Transforming the NAS: the next generation air traffic control system (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Isaac, A.R., Ruitenberg, B.: Air Traffic Control: Human Performance Factors. Routledge, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wong, B., et al.: 3D-in-2D displays for ATC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Research Council: Flight to the Future: Human Factors in Air Traffic Control. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Masotti, N., Persiani, F.: On the history and prospects of three-dimensional human–computer interfaces for the provision of air traffic control services. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 7(2), 149–166 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hou, X., et al.: EEG-based human factors evaluation of conflict resolution aid and tactile user interface in future Air Traffic Control systems. In: Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, pp. 885–897. Springer, Heidelberg (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. IVAO. https://www.ivao.aero/ViewDocument.aspx?Path=/training:atc:docs

  10. Melby, P., Mayer, R.: Benefit potential of continuous climb and descent operations. In: The 26th Congress of ICAS and 8th AIAA ATIO (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clarke, J.-P., et al.: Optimized profile descent arrivals at Los Angeles international airport. J. Aircraft 50(2), 360–369 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gardi, A., et al.: 4 Dimensional trajectory functionalities for air traffic management systems. In: 2015 Integrated Communication, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference (ICNS). IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loft, S., et al.: Modeling and predicting mental workload in en route air traffic control: critical review and broader implications. Hum. Factors 49(3), 376–399 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller, S.: Workload Measures. National Advanced Driving Simulator, Iowa City (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, Y., Sourina, O.: Real-time subject-dependent EEG-based emotion recognition algorithm. In: Transactions on Computational Science XXIII, pp. 199–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim, W.L., et al.: EEG-based mental workload recognition related to multitasking. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lim, W.L., et al.: EEG-based mental workload and stress monitoring of crew members in maritime virtual simulator. In: Gavrilova, M.L., Tan, C.J.K., Sourin, A. (eds.) Transactions on Computational Science XXXII: Special Issue on Cybersecurity and Biometrics, pp. 15–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4(1), 53–71 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Emotiv. http://www.emotiv.com

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS), Air Traffic Management Research Institute (ATMRI) Project ATMRI: 2014-R5-CHEN and by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its international Research Centres in Singapore Funding Initiative. We would like to acknowledge the final year project students of School of MAE of Nanyang Technological University for their contribution in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yisi Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, Y. et al. (2020). Human Factors Evaluation of ATC Operational Procedures in Relation to Use of 3D Display. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Factors of Transportation. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 964. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20503-4_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20503-4_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20502-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20503-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics